We lost because we didn't have Zach Miller

tom sawyer · Oct 13, 2014

...

Well I haven't seen this excuse yet. So there!!

hwell2:

8)

IndyHawk84 · Oct 13, 2014

Actually glad to see this was a joke! lmao. I was going to jump in here and be like really?! Zack is the reason we played soft and got our asses kicked!?

But good one!

minormillikin · Oct 13, 2014

Unger might have something to do with it, as much as anyone. I haven't looked into it yet, but I think last season or before we had some bad games when Unger was out. That guy has been the leader of the oline for a while and it must have some effect when he's replaced by a new guy.

In any case... The loss wasn't caused by one thing alone, obviously. And, the Cowboys weren't making things easy with all of their "execution."

SoulfishHawk · Oct 13, 2014

Well, I'd say we lost more because WE HAVE BEVELL. :lol:

seahawks187 · Oct 14, 2014

joke or not zach miller would of helped

AF_Hawk · Oct 14, 2014

Injuries played a factor but that doesnt excuse the inability to execute THAT much. Dallas controlled the clock just like San Diego did but unlike San Diego the Seahawks offense was ineffective due to many factors, including key injuries.

daveman918 · Oct 15, 2014

seahawks187":1x82eaw9 said:
joke or not zach miller would of helped

:13:

Having Zach for Blocking and Unger to call out protections would have helped a ton.

byau · Oct 15, 2014

Good one

you got me. (and sure he would have helped, and .. you got me)

We lost because we didn't have Zach Miller

tom sawyer

New member

IndyHawk84

New member

minormillikin

Well-known member

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member

seahawks187

New member

AF_Hawk

Well-known member

daveman918

New member

byau

Active member

Similar threads

Latest posts