kearly":3clgb302 said:
I've never really thought of myself as anti-political correctness, but things have gotten out of hand lately. Even well reasoned, common sense, articulately explained positions are jumped all over in the media if they don't perfectly fit the PC narrative.
We have to remember that the process is as important as the goal. Progress is achieved through dialogue, not dictation.
The gist of Smith's comment is that sometimes, there is more than one person who bares responsibility. Maybe he should have emphasized "sometimes." But his meaning should have been easy to understand for most. Everyone in the media that is comparing it to statements he didn't make regarding rape, etc is either really bad at logic and/or is just being an asshole.
There are a lot of shitty people in the world, and I think some of the backlash you hear is simply because a lot of people won't pass up a socially sanctioned opportunity to be an asshole to a stranger.
You brought this up in another thread when talking about Tony Dungy and you mentioned Mark Cuban, too.
I would say that each of those cases are unique. I agree with you re: Cuban because he was honestly being brave to admit that he is sometimes reflexively prejudiced. We ALL are, and his point was that we should realize when we are being that way and confront ourselves when we are. The minor backlash over that was just stupid; people weren't paying attention to what he was saying.
Dungy, I get why people were up in arms. He was essentially saying that Sam should get a chance, but he wouldn't give it to him. That's pretty egregious considering that Dungy needed someone else to give a black man a chance despite "the distractions" so that Dungy would be able to play, and later coach, in the NFL (wasn't Al Davis the first guy to hire a black head coach in the NFL, by the way? Was it Art Shell?).
With Smith, what he is saying does have merit, even if people are uncomfortable with the idea (sometimes, not all the time, women do goad men or other women in their relationships into physical altercations), but the issue is that in this case, when we have tape of Ray Rice drilling a woman in the face and dragging her out of the elevator, there is almost NO provocation, short of her pulling a gun on him, that would ever justify the KO punch (and even if he HAD to KO her, dragging her by the hair after that is unconscionable).
The context of what Rice did to his wife did not call for Smith choosing to address that position regarding women at all. It was inappropriate for this discussion. Furthermore, because there are still a number of guys out there that beat their wives without any provocation and those women are afraid to leave/stay in the relationship to get beaten, the topic is so delicate that I don't know why you'd have two morons like Smith and Bayless chirp about it on a show designed to sensationalize every topic it addresses anyway.