Milehighhawk
Member
- Joined
- Oct 7, 2012
- Messages
- 928
- Reaction score
- 23
Attyla the Hawk":b2k0dpi7 said:Don't see a problem with reducing to 10 minutes. Extended time only affects 1.5% of all OT contests anyway.
....
I'd be willing to bet that not allowing a team to retie in OT affects more than 1.5% of OT games.
May I ask where you got these numbers? You coud mean something different by extended time? They don't look right and don't appear to jive with the numbers I have seen coming up with the announcement of this rule change. One article cites that 22 of a total of 83 overtime games in the last 5 seasons have exceeded 10 minutes (that is an astounding 26.5%!). Of those, 5 ended in a tie. The article I link minimizes the impact, but a projeccted increase from 1 tie per year to 3.2 is huge. (over 300% increase).
Going back further in time, I see data that says from 1974 to 2003 there were 324 overtime games with 15 resulting in ties (4.6%). The ruleset/kick-off placement was very different during that time hedging even further against the likelyhood of a tie and yet it still far exceeds the 1.5% number you note above.
I would suggest, based on this data, that this rule change will have a significant impact, greatly increasing the number of ties we see, and feel it isn't a good thing.
Referece: http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap30...ers-approve-shortening-overtime-to-10-minutes