ivotuk
Well-known member
Clayton thinks 1 year at 5 million might do it. I'll bet it's much higher though, 8 or 9 is probably what he'll get.
Gerald McCoy?
- Thread starter toffee
- Start date
OP
OP
toffee
Well-known member
i Wil stil do itivotuk":e9koga3a said:
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
godawg
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 6, 2009
- Messages
- 575
- Reaction score
- 51
With the Bucs dumping McCoy’s salary to pick up Suh, we have a great opportunity to pick up a great player with a Seahawks attitude. Please do it !
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OP
OP
toffee
Well-known member
godawg":2c7dcvwq said:
Can we afford him, if he wants a multi year deal?
Sgt. Largent
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2012
- Messages
- 25,560
- Reaction score
- 7,611
toffee":tvrrx4nd said:
With already signing Wood, Ansah and still needing to extend Bobby and Reed.........I can't see where it makes sense to get into the McCoy sweepstakes, and IMO there will be a sweepstakes. Still healthy and relatively productive.
Probably going to get a big one year guaranteed deal, or muti-year deal from someone.
OP
OP
toffee
Well-known member
Sgt. Largent":2frmyrc4 said:
Wondering what's behind signing Suh instead of extending McCoy? Performance? Cost? Relationship?
Sgt. Largent
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2012
- Messages
- 25,560
- Reaction score
- 7,611
toffee":1z612uak said:
It's what it's always about, money.
The Bucs just signed Bucannon, Barrett and Suh for what they would have had to pay McCoy with a monster extension.
Nothing wrong with McCoy, he's still a good player. But like us with Clark, if you have depth issues it's hard to justify spending all your D-line cap space on one player. Cause it doesn't fix the problem.
OP
OP
toffee
Well-known member
Sgt. Largent":l73vwoll said:
If McCoy won’t take a cut for Buc, guessing we couldn’t and wouldn’t be a destination for him.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
BirdsCommaAngry
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Messages
- 1,278
- Reaction score
- 78
Why? They're probably contending.
Floridahawk79
Well-known member
knownone":1ykp6rcz said:
They're trending
King Dog
Well-known member
I'm disappointed we don't seem to have any interest. He would be a nice piece, and we plenty of cash.
jammerhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 10,181
- Reaction score
- 1,785
He isn't the same player he used to be, and his contract demands are too high for what he delivers. To me the team is better off paying our own young guys and finding complimentary players, and eventually finding a guy in the draft.
The bidding for him is at the $11 mil/yr. level and he'd be a wave player here. Too much for what he'd do. Which DT of Poona and Reed would he supplant?
The bidding for him is at the $11 mil/yr. level and he'd be a wave player here. Too much for what he'd do. Which DT of Poona and Reed would he supplant?
There is a case to be made that he'd supplant both Poona and Reed from a talent perspective. If we signed him, he'd be a starter over Poona.jammerhawk":2d732jdu said:
I wouldn't sign him for 11m, but I wouldn't be mad if we did. He'll still be one of the best 3 techniques in the game for a few more years.
Largent80
New member
I firmly believe that the Hawks are writing an extension for Wagner. And the Hawks are tired of these types of players demanding large contracts at an older age.
TB is switching to a 2-gap 34 defense. McCoy is a pure 1 gap 3 Tech.
So he doesn't fit with what they are looking to do.
I don't know how much of it was due to age or injury concerns, but scheme fit was a big reason why he isn't there anymore.
So he doesn't fit with what they are looking to do.
I don't know how much of it was due to age or injury concerns, but scheme fit was a big reason why he isn't there anymore.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/1135671044587556871[/tweet]
SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
And Suh will be wearing #93. Even better for those two matchups.
Similar threads
