Odell Beckham...best catch ever?

One handeded...unreal.

[youtube]OHuMmp9HZrA[/youtube]

Meh. Do it bare-handed and I'm impressed.

Idk bout best ever but it was very impressive and should be one of the top plays of the year.
Kid has mad ball skills.
I hope he stays humble and keeps his nose clean.

I'm usually a critic of the vagiants, but damn, that was an incredible catch, even better that it was against the overrated cowpukes.

My phone has been blowing up since the catch. A lot of people are wrong if it's not the best ever.

No catch where the receiver has nobody touching him is eligible for even one of the top ten best catches ever.

No way in hell. IMO.

This kid is amazing. Great hands.

RolandDeschain":1y6da60b said:

No catch where the receiver has nobody touching him is eligible for even one of the top ten best catches ever.

No way in hell. IMO.

Click to expand...

Dude he caught it with not just one hand, it was actually only three fingers. Give the guy credit.

RolandDeschain":19liu4ps said:

No catch where the receiver has nobody touching him is eligible for even one of the top ten best catches ever.

No way in hell. IMO.

Click to expand...

Nobody touching him? He was mauled. Didn't you see the yellow flag?

lvnginhwktwn":3tqnyuo8 said:

Dude he caught it with not just one hand, it was actually only three fingers. Give the guy credit.

Click to expand...

I know. It was a great catch.

It was also uncontested when the ball came in, nobody on him or immediately in front of him. Not even close to "all-time great" status, and I bet he'll agree if asked about that aspect of it after the game.

I think a lot of people don't have a clue how hard it is to actually just catch regular passes with DBs draped on you.

ZorntoLargent":3tqnyuo8 said:

Nobody touching him? He was mauled. Didn't you see the yellow flag?

Click to expand...

Did you? Yes, he got mauled. Well beforehand. Watch it again, when the ball's actually coming in close to him, he's free with a good bit of space around him and in front of him.

RolandDeschain":1zq60h5w said:

No catch where the receiver has nobody touching him is eligible for even one of the top ten best catches ever.

No way in hell. IMO.

Click to expand...

If that's in response for this catch, if you watched the vid, Collinsworth says repeatedly that he was fouled prior to the catch (also probably is reasoning why the DB falling, cause they were battling). Not 100% sure, didn't watch the play live.

...See what I replied with just before your reply, dontbelikethat.

The foul happened way early and when the ball came in, he might as well have not had anybody within 50 yards of him in terms of defenders adding difficulty to the catch as it was happening.

Lot of people seem to be having trouble grasping this...

Well, Greatest is subjective. I think it was the best catch I have ever seen.

Scottemojo":3oac4fbf said:

Well, Greatest is subjective. I think it was the best catch I have ever seen.

Click to expand...

Same catch with Sherman draped all over him, arms up, as the ball's coming in, and now you're talking. WORLD of difference.

Roland just feels left out and is desperately trying to socialize here. Arguing's the easiest route. He took a fun thread, with a bunch of guys saying "wow what a catch" and wants to argue over semantics and logic. Roland is to fun what spritzed lemon juice is to a nude burn victims.

The immaculate reception was also a clean catch. Considered by most pundits a top 5 catch

Roland is to fun threads what chapped assholes are to 5 mile walks.

falcongoggles":1uynj1hl said:

The immaculate reception was also a clean catch. Considered by most pundits a top 5 catch

Click to expand...

For completely and utterly different reasons including WILD coincidence. You don't consider this an analogy, do you?

It was 118 on the field in San Diego.