AS long as you support your division you'll love #2!
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... irst-title
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... irst-title
hawknation2015":1r10xrxp said:
I can't take any article seriously that includes Alex Smith on a list that says he has a serious shot at winning a Superbowl.ringless":2247gt31 said:AS long as you support your division you'll love #2!
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... irst-title
SuperMan28":3t5w7on6 said:Really irks me so many talking heads are high on Bradford when all they did was bash the guy while he was in STL.
I can't argue with Andrew Luck. But I think Nick Foles has a better chance than Palmer. (Not sure if my homerism is shining through, here. I just don't think Palmer can stay healthy or is even all that good anymore.)
I'd put Romo over Luck, anyhow. Indi is just such a weak team. They're just too clean. I don't think Luck will ever beat out Brady or Flacco, either. Just me.
Luck is overrated, that ticks me off too. Media crowned him from day 1.
ringless":153jcozz said:AS long as you support your division you'll love #2!
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... irst-title
SuperMan28":1a2iwcry said:Really irks me so many talking heads are high on Bradford when all they did was bash the guy while he was in STL.
I can't argue with Andrew Luck. But I think Nick Foles has a better chance than Palmer. (Not sure if my homerism is shining through, here. I just don't think Palmer can stay healthy or is even all that good anymore.)
I'd put Romo over Luck, anyhow. Indi is just such a weak team. They're just too clean. I don't think Luck will ever beat out Brady or Flacco, either. Just me.
Luck is overrated, that ticks me off too. Media crowned him from day 1.
Throwdown":4ipmbrq6 said:ringless":4ipmbrq6 said:AS long as you support your division you'll love #2!
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... irst-title
Not gonna support my division, I hate all yall, just hate the Rams a little more.
Rex":3ttun337 said:SuperMan28":3ttun337 said:Really irks me so many talking heads are high on Bradford when all they did was bash the guy while he was in STL.
I can't argue with Andrew Luck. But I think Nick Foles has a better chance than Palmer. (Not sure if my homerism is shining through, here. I just don't think Palmer can stay healthy or is even all that good anymore.)
I'd put Romo over Luck, anyhow. Indi is just such a weak team. They're just too clean. I don't think Luck will ever beat out Brady or Flacco, either. Just me.
Luck is overrated, that ticks me off too. Media crowned him from day 1.
Rams destroyed Indy with Luck at QB. Strongest all around performance by the Rams in a decade.
brimsalabim":287hkdbb said:How is Indi weak? They have stacked their offense like the Hawks have defense.
Maulbert":2j1hhbbc said:Rex":2j1hhbbc said:SuperMan28":2j1hhbbc said:Really irks me so many talking heads are high on Bradford when all they did was bash the guy while he was in STL.
I can't argue with Andrew Luck. But I think Nick Foles has a better chance than Palmer. (Not sure if my homerism is shining through, here. I just don't think Palmer can stay healthy or is even all that good anymore.)
I'd put Romo over Luck, anyhow. Indi is just such a weak team. They're just too clean. I don't think Luck will ever beat out Brady or Flacco, either. Just me.
Luck is overrated, that ticks me off too. Media crowned him from day 1.
Rams destroyed Indy with Luck at QB. Strongest all around performance by the Rams in a decade.
That long between good games is what happens when you have 4 winning seasons in 25 years like the Rams have. Guess that's why you feel so at home with Fisher as their coach, Rex.
SuperMan28":3dnnhtsl said:brimsalabim":3dnnhtsl said:How is Indi weak? They have stacked their offense like the Hawks have defense.
Weak as in soft. They get bullied in the same manner SEA thrashed DEN in the SB. Saw it first hand when STL rocked them with Clemens under C two years ago.