Jordy Nelson hurt... Probably torn ACL

dontbelikethat

New member
Joined
Nov 30, 2010
Messages
3,358
Reaction score
0
[tweet]https://twitter.com/NFL/status/635526267023032320[/tweet]

[tweet]https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/635525232959356933[/tweet]
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
Hate to see injuries, no matter when in the season but it really stings when you have them even before the regular season starts. Blink of an eye and your team's season can go from promising to difficult. I am sure the Packers will be able to keep their production up but a big hit.
 

BASF

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
3,801
Reaction score
2,410
Location
Tijuana/San Diego
Seriously sucks for the whole league. If any of our fans are in Vegas right now, place bets on the Seahawks now to win the Super Bowl, cuz the lines will change in our favor really fast with this news.
 

253hawk

Active member
Joined
Sep 13, 2013
Messages
3,322
Reaction score
15
Location
PNW
Players getting hurt left and right; Heinz Field is still a POS.
 

dumbrabbit

New member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
821
Reaction score
0
Anyone think the Packers might make a go at one the Seahawks Wide Receivers?
 

ringless

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
1,978
Reaction score
0
dumbrabbit":1osx0ioq said:
Anyone think the Packers might make a go at one the Seahawks Wide Receivers?


I don't know why everytime a WR gets injured this comes up. There are about to be 1184 players cut from their respective teams over the next couple of weeks. There are deeper WR corps than Seattles
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,592
Reaction score
4,944
Location
North of the Wall
they will be more than fine with cobb and adams. but kearse for a 7th rder...then we sign mathis...can live with that.
 

dumbrabbit

New member
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
821
Reaction score
0
ringless":2tx20xaz said:
dumbrabbit":2tx20xaz said:
Anyone think the Packers might make a go at one the Seahawks Wide Receivers?


I don't know why everytime a WR gets injured this comes up. There are about to be 1184 players cut from their respective teams over the next couple of weeks. There are deeper WR corps than Seattles

As Cyrus said, trade Kearse and there's your money to sign Mathis.
 

vonstout

Active member
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
532
Reaction score
69
The Pack are deep at WR. They wouldn't want ANY of our WRs.
 

hawkfan68

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
9,986
Reaction score
1,676
Location
Sammamish, WA
Big loss for the Packers. Packers aren't going to trade for Kearse. They aren't as desperate as some think. They have Devante Adams (who's better than Kearse, IMO).

There have been quite a bit of ACL injuries this preseason. I don't recall this much of this type of injury this early last preseason.
 

rideaducati

New member
Joined
Jul 25, 2012
Messages
5,414
Reaction score
0
dumbrabbit":vfmbf9pb said:
ringless":vfmbf9pb said:
dumbrabbit":vfmbf9pb said:
Anyone think the Packers might make a go at one the Seahawks Wide Receivers?


I don't know why everytime a WR gets injured this comes up. There are about to be 1184 players cut from their respective teams over the next couple of weeks. There are deeper WR corps than Seattles

As Cyrus said, trade Kearse and there's your money to sign Mathis.

Who the hell is the GM that would give more than a water cooler for Kearse? If the Seahawks only received a water cooler for Kearse, the Seahawks will have won that trade.
 

drdiags

New member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
10,682
Reaction score
1
Location
Kent, Washington
Sounds like McCarthy is still holding out hope that it isn't what has been reported. It did look bad on the play but as he walked off you couldn't tell he was hurt. Maybe his demise is a bit pre-mature.
 

endzorn

Active member
Joined
Mar 17, 2007
Messages
2,750
Reaction score
0
Nelson was Rodger's favorite target, but I think they have enough talent with Cobb, Adams and Montgomery coming in that this won't be devastating.
 
Top