HawkGA":3s51n18l said:
Apparently I was right in my prediction that the Rams would get 3 of their first 4 games against division opponents. In a surprise, however, 2 of those 3 are on the road. They don't even open at home. Why in the heck the NFL wouldn't have a home game to start off a season in a new city is beyond me. Stupid. Absolutely stupid.
This is all due to the scheduling rules with USC. Believe me, many Rams fans are upset.
However, Rams fans had a discussion sometime in Feb about the USC scheduling rules. There is some article defining them...if we find it again I will share. It mainly has to do with night games and other rules regarding when USC plays at home. So, NFL has a lot of scheduling issues and I'm sure working around USC was not a priority. They just went with it.
I'm very disapointed our first game is a road game. But, well, hey: our first home game is not in St. Louis so you will see no sadness from me. I'm happy.
Rams will simply need to deal with it. We have two home games in the first 8 weeks.
We also have:
Four 10am games
Zero games playing a team off a bye
Our bye is after the London game (week eight) and then we get a home game (yay)
2 weather games (@Pats and @Jets)
And, FINALLY!!!! - we do not end at Hawks or Niners. We have our last two games at home.
So, it's a tough schedule, but has some good points as well.