Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

Bruce Irvin

Discuss any and all NFL-related topics and matters of interest here. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
Bruce Irvin
Tue Feb 27, 2018 1:11 pm

Re: Bruce Irvin
Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:29 pm
  • Glasgow Seahawk wrote:Likely to be a cap casualty in Oakland. He's been saying a lot of good things about the hawks and Ken Norton Jr lately.

    If the price is right I think he would be ideal LB/Pass rush depth. Thoughts?

    http://www.espn.com/blog/oakland-raider ... casualties

    For the right price I’d take him back and hope he has gotten better at finishing plays.
    SEATTLE SEAHAWKS SUPERBOWL XLVIII CHAMPIONS!

    May the spirit of our friend The Radish live on forever!

    I SO do not care about your fantasy team and who's on it!
    Sports Hernia
    NET Ring Of Honor
     
    Posts: 23832
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm
    Location: The pit


Re: Bruce Irvin
Tue Feb 27, 2018 3:54 pm
  • Bruce Irvin... maybe at this right price (which would be league minimum) His motor only runs certain downs and he’s kind of a knucklehead with foot in mouth disease. Never became a “Professional” athlete.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
    User avatar
    AKNFidel
    NET Practice Squad
     
    Posts: 73
    Joined: Mon Nov 16, 2009 12:49 am
    Location: North Pole, Alaska


Re: Bruce Irvin
Tue Feb 27, 2018 8:01 pm
  • I remember Raible saying a time or two , Bruce no ........ but he was still good enough that we could use a guy like him right about now
    Claytons saying it's likely gonna take five or six maybe even 8 a year to keep him but I bet we could get him for five as a third down pass rush guy
    What are you
    I'm a mog , half man , half dog
    I'm my own best friend
    User avatar
    hawxfreak
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 522
    Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2012 6:04 pm
    Location: The Burbs in Lacey


Re: Bruce Irvin
Tue Feb 27, 2018 11:28 pm
  • No thanks.

    I want this team to get younger on defense, not sign an ageing vet.
    www.hawk-talk.com

    Image

    Richard Sherman wrote:People look forward to writing us off. Our demise was greatly overstated.
    User avatar
    original poster
    * NET Moderator *
     
    Posts: 3166
    Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:55 am


Re: Bruce Irvin
Wed Feb 28, 2018 5:04 am
  • Unless it's a low number, no thanks. I always saw him as a very overrated/inconsistent player really. That being said, if he's will to take a lower number to be back here in Seattle, it's worth a look.
    R.I.P. THE EDGAR, YOU WILL BE MISSED......
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10408
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Bruce Irvin
Wed Feb 28, 2018 9:06 am

Re: Bruce Irvin
Wed Feb 28, 2018 11:22 am
  • original poster wrote:No thanks.

    I want this team to get younger on defense, not sign an ageing vet.


    Agree in a sense, however with the amount of draft picks we have.. and the holes on this roster .. they will have to add a few vets to round up the roster. Bruce wouldn't be a bad vet to add, but as others have said, he'd have to come cheap. Don't really see that coming with a lot of teams needing to spend money this FA period.
    ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
    User avatar
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 11374
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm


Re: Bruce Irvin
Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:06 pm
  • McKenzie says today that Irvin isn't going anywhere.

    http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -anywhere/

    IMO almost 10M a year is a lot to pay for 8 sacks and a guy who is every bit as inconsistent as he was here.
    If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
    User avatar
    Sgt. Largent
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 13609
    Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am


Re: Bruce Irvin
Wed Feb 28, 2018 3:27 pm
  • Hes staying, and was on Twitter today asking people to send him Mo Wilkerson's handle.

    Him along with Mack, and Mo..... Good lord.
    "Practice without improvement is meaningless" - Chuck Knox
    User avatar
    2_0_6
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2819
    Joined: Fri Sep 20, 2013 11:40 pm
    Location: South Seattle


Re: Bruce Irvin
Thu Mar 01, 2018 6:39 am
  • Their D sucked, yet again. I'll worry when I actually see real Defense in Oakland.
    R.I.P. THE EDGAR, YOU WILL BE MISSED......
    User avatar
    SoulfishHawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10408
    Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Bruce Irvin
Thu Mar 01, 2018 7:54 pm
  • Here's an interesting idea.

    First as a Seattle fan would you want to trade Michael Bennett for Bruce Irvin straight up?

    Second is that a realistic trade for both teams? I feel like Seattle would be taking on a lot more of Irvin's cap hit than Oakland would Bennett's. So maybe the numbers just don't work. However I think the players are a perfect swap for the teams...
    User avatar
    DJrmb
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1424
    Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:53 pm




It is currently Fri Nov 16, 2018 8:30 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ NFL NATION ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 46 guests