Hawk-Lock":3k6owbpv said:
If we are going to bring in a FA RB, Hill wouldn't be a terrible option. But after Lacy, why go down this road again? Hill has underwhelmed for most of his career, just like Lacy. I think we should just draft a young kid and hope we are set for the next few years at that position.
is eddy lacy really the benchmark for underwhelming fa's for everyone around here moving forward into infinity?
Sorry but this is like the tenth post I've seen saying as much and quite frankly, when you have to put it in writing that the fatass needs to lose x amount of pounds for contract dough, pun intended, pc and js are the morons for believing in that Jenny Craig failed tub of lard.
Hill was the 2015 rushing td leader, and posted over 800 yds in 16, then injury year. I'd hardly say underwhelming.
That label would apply to a fellow second rounder like C Michael or something.
With lacy, the writing was on the wall and our FO has been illiterate in FA.
