Graham to Packers

WilsonMVP

New member
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
2,771
Reaction score
0
This will be an interesting signing.

Rodgers is only making 20 mil against the Cap right now and Packers only have 20 or so million in cap.

You KNOW Rodgers is going to make 30 mil a year bare minimum easy on the contract extension maybe even pushing to 35 mil
 

Coug_Hawk08

New member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
4,463
Reaction score
0
He could be great there, though he had a better chance to win it all with the Saints imo. Saints looked much better than packers last year, and they have young guys just coming up.

Pretty amazing for him to go Brees, Wilson, Rodgers.
 

peppersjap

New member
Joined
Sep 6, 2014
Messages
853
Reaction score
0
He is going to have a huge year in GB. I was a huge Graham fan but he seemed to have lost interest here and would quit on routes. I really don't blame him for that because he was incredibly misused here!
 

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
7,992
Reaction score
1,625
Watch Rodgers get drilled when JG takes plays off and won't even try to block.
At least AR will throw it up there so JG can catch it most of the time.
 

original poster

New member
Joined
Nov 24, 2014
Messages
3,201
Reaction score
1
I'm very intrigued to see how it goes.

Could just as easily go either way in my opinion.
 

Sox-n-Hawks

Active member
Joined
Dec 26, 2014
Messages
3,647
Reaction score
0
Seahawk_Dan":2jnce5xo said:
I'm expecting 1000+ yards and 12TD for him this season.

I'm expecting him to miss a key block and Rogers and the rest of the backfield to get wrecked on at least 50 plays.
 

WmHBonney

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 27, 2012
Messages
2,731
Reaction score
1,006
Packers do not have a history of feeding the TE. I don't see this as too big of a deal.
 

Fade

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
5,454
Reaction score
2,988
Location
Truth Ray
If Graham & Rodgers are both healthy for 16 games. 16 TDs easy.
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,579
Reaction score
4,920
Location
North of the Wall
KitsapGuy":lwlyuinp said:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Peter_Bukowski/status/986646253126803456[/tweet]

He can smile about this but he didn't want to work in the dirty areas of the field where he might take a hit from a guy 50 lbs less in weight than him.Weakest big guy I think I have seen in the NFL. Not saying he wasn't good but just didn't like getting hit. I am sure he will do well in GB but he was the wrong guy for this team. We need Zach Miller 2.0...
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,653
Reaction score
10,071
Location
Sammamish, WA
I liked the guy, but he seemed like he flat out refused to block at times, and also got a case of Butterfingers too often. Stuck up for him for awhile. Just too inconsistent for what they were paying him. When he's on, he's very good. But, you can't just drop that many passes and refuse to block and expect full respect.
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,117
Reaction score
948
Location
Kissimmee, FL
Cyrus12":2w9qsnbj said:
He can smile about this but he didn't want to work in the dirty areas of the field where he might take a hit from a guy 50 lbs less in weight than him.Weakest big guy I think I have seen in the NFL. Not saying he wasn't good but just didn't like getting hit. I am sure he will do well in GB but he was the wrong guy for this team. We need Zach Miller 2.0...
He wasn't the wrong guy, we had the wrong coordinator. He should have been used as a stud receiver...like how the Saints used him...and how the Packers are about to use him...
 

Seanhawk

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
6,819
Reaction score
0
Cyrus12":3qjah667 said:
KitsapGuy":3qjah667 said:
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Peter_Bukowski/status/986646253126803456[/tweet]

He can smile about this but he didn't want to work in the dirty areas of the field where he might take a hit from a guy 50 lbs less in weight than him.Weakest big guy I think I have seen in the NFL. Not saying he wasn't good but just didn't like getting hit. I am sure he will do well in GB but he was the wrong guy for this team. We need Zach Miller 2.0...

I have a feeling he'll disappear in the cold weather games which doesn't bode well for playoff production if they have home games.
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,579
Reaction score
4,920
Location
North of the Wall
RolandDeschain":214j22xl said:
Cyrus12":214j22xl said:
He can smile about this but he didn't want to work in the dirty areas of the field where he might take a hit from a guy 50 lbs less in weight than him.Weakest big guy I think I have seen in the NFL. Not saying he wasn't good but just didn't like getting hit. I am sure he will do well in GB but he was the wrong guy for this team. We need Zach Miller 2.0...
He wasn't the wrong guy, we had the wrong coordinator. He should have been used as a stud receiver...like how the Saints used him...and how the Packers are about to use him...

Perhaps but they attempted to use him as an actual TE which imo he is not. Cant block in the run game and couldn't take a hit. I don't see that changing in GB.
 
Top