Dallas signs DeMarcus Lawrence to a huge contract

HawkGA

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
107,412
Reaction score
1
Just above or just under? Where do you think Frank comes in?
 

Popeyejones

Active member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
5,525
Reaction score
0
HawkGA":qa31v6av said:
Just above or just under? Where do you think Frank comes in?

Just above, but it would have been the reverse if Clark went first.

More than anything though, I'd *guess* they're also looking for different deal structures.

Lawrence is only a couple years older (27), but he's taking a five year to up the GTD because this is his big payout.

I could easily see Clark angling for something like 65 over 3 years w/ 40 GTD, which could give him a second huge payout in his age 28 season.

The Hawks wouldn't want to do that (it's a small bump in numbers on Lawrence's deal, but the real hit is two less years of team control if they want it), but Clark may be able to force it because the Seahawks are kind of bent over the barrel for the franchise tag next year (with Wilson, Wagner, and Clark all coming up, that means that for two out of the three of these guys the Seahawks can't use the tag as a bargaining chip, which really, really does weaken their bargaining position -- it even does this off-season, b/c agents recognize the conundrum their in next off-season).
 

Cyrus12

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2013
Messages
17,582
Reaction score
4,927
Location
North of the Wall
Lawrence imo is a lot better than Clark. If Lawrrnce is first tier talent than Clark is second and the pay check should reflect it.
 

Maulbert

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
8,589
Reaction score
1,394
Location
In the basement of Reynholm Industries
IndyHawk":27sgezv7 said:
http://www.espn.com/blog/dallas-cowboys/post/_/id/4769048/new-deal-for-demarcus-lawrence-was-crucial-for-cowboys?device=featurephone

Frank Clark wants to get his family fed now..
This certainly makes it harder to pay him.
A "War Daddie"is special according to
Jerruh :lol:


Five years, $105 million with $65 million guaranteed
Screw Dallas! :pukeface:

Don't worry. Just wait until they massively overpay Dak Prescott.
 
OP
OP
IndyHawk

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
7,993
Reaction score
1,626
There is a few more they have to pay also.. Elliot being one.
I'm going to love watching it..Team imploding because of
cap hell..There are lessons to be learned from it.
 

rlkats

Active member
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
2,169
Reaction score
0
The whole league is way over paid. They;
Catch the pigskin
Throw the pigskin
Sack the guy throwing or catching the pigskin

You know who should make 100mil


Airport janitors they get the crap jobs
Hahahahaha
 

Popeyejones

Active member
Joined
Aug 20, 2013
Messages
5,525
Reaction score
0
rlkats":192trmfz said:
The whole league is way over paid. They;
Catch the pigskin
Throw the pigskin
Sack the guy throwing or catching the pigskin

You know who should make 100mil


Airport janitors they get the crap jobs
Hahahahaha

Financial compensation for workers is primarily driven by two* mechanisms:

(1) The raw quantity of replaceable or superior talent for your position minus the cost of friction for replacement.

(2) The revenue returns that can be generated from the contribution of your labor.

Long story short, if you don't like how much NFL players get paid, you prefer USSR- and North Korea-style communism to capitalism, which is fine, but that's what your beef is.





* ---- Re "two": the third is about the % of revenue extracted from labor which can be withheld for the firm as profit, but we're not talking about that because the NFL is a legal monopoly that also happens to be located in the best developed country in the world for withholding labor generated revenue for profit, so it's really a non-issue in this case.
 

kobebryant

New member
Joined
May 23, 2009
Messages
2,511
Reaction score
1
rlkats":24lem54a said:
The whole league is way over paid. They;
Catch the pigskin
Throw the pigskin
Sack the guy throwing or catching the pigskin

You know who should make 100mil


Airport janitors they get the crap jobs
Hahahahaha

Actually I'd argue that they're underpaid relative to revenue generated and the uniqueness of their talent. Demarcus Lawrence, never mind someone like Aaron Rodgers or Russell Wilson would make a heck of a lot more I'd there weren't salary control tools in place such as the franchise tag and salary cap.

Whatever Lawrence got from Dallas is less than what he would have received if he had been allowed to test the market.

Franchise tags, salary caps and the draft are socialism in a league ran by capitalists and are un -American.
 

rlkats

Active member
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
2,169
Reaction score
0
Popeyejones":3rb51eit said:
rlkats":3rb51eit said:
The whole league is way over paid. They;
Catch the pigskin
Throw the pigskin
Sack the guy throwing or catching the pigskin

You know who should make 100mil


Airport janitors they get the crap jobs
Hahahahaha

Financial compensation for workers is primarily driven by two* mechanisms:

(1) The raw quantity of replaceable or superior talent for your position minus the cost of friction for replacement.

(2) The revenue returns that can be generated from the contribution of your labor.

Long story short, if you don't like how much NFL players get paid, you prefer USSR- and North Korea-style communism to capitalism, which is fine, but that's what your beef is.





* ---- Re "two": the third is about the % of revenue extracted from labor which can be withheld for the firm as profit, but we're not talking about that because the NFL is a legal monopoly that also happens to be located in the best developed country in the world for withholding labor generated revenue for profit, so it's really a non-issue in this case.



It was a joke dude. Have a beer and chill the hell out damn man.
 

rlkats

Active member
Joined
May 15, 2012
Messages
2,169
Reaction score
0
Hey all don’t take my post serious. Apparently I need to draw it out in crayons.


IT WAS A JOKE. IT WAS A JOKE. CHRIST SAKE IT WAS A GD JOKE
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
rlkats":1xu3mlz0 said:
Hey all don’t take my post serious. Apparently I need to draw it out in crayons.


IT WAS A JOKE. IT WAS A JOKE. CHRIST SAKE IT WAS A GD JOKE

It was a dumb joke that got old around 1997. Also, it is a joke that is so old all of the responses to it are ready to go at all times.
 
OP
OP
IndyHawk

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
7,993
Reaction score
1,626
I see DL had surgery for a torn labrum..Same as Luck and myself had.
I can tell you he isn't going to be ready early in season if at all.
Why do these guys wait long after the issue to have it fixed?
There is no rehab to fix it as it will never heal itself.
I love the fact it's going to hurt the Cowboys.. :lol:
 

ApnaHawk

New member
Joined
Nov 23, 2015
Messages
343
Reaction score
0
I never understood why people get upset about what another man is earning. His living - his pay. He can blow it on cars drugs money whatever. There is enough of it to go around in this country.
 
OP
OP
IndyHawk

IndyHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2013
Messages
7,993
Reaction score
1,626
BirdsCommaAngry":1ip0q9n4 said:
IndyHawk":1ip0q9n4 said:
Frank Clark wants to get his family fed now..

Is his family eating salads made out of $100 bills?
They will be now :lol:
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
I don't get the idea behind this. 2016 was a lost season due to his suspension and injury in January 2016. 2017 his big breakout season 14 sacks. Then this past season he was back down to 10 sacks which were closer to his 8 sacks in 2015. It does not really seem like he is trending upward. Clark has gone 10,9,13 in sack production, those numbers are all really close and his only low production season was his first season.
 
Top