http://www.fieldgulls.com/latest-news/2 ... interested
http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/mike- ... evis-trade
bestfightstory wrote:WHAAAAAAAT????
Curious, I can see....
But highly interested???
Hmmmmm.
Several team sources are claiming the Jets want a first- and second-round pick for Revis, which is astronomical payment considering Revis -- while one of the best players in all of football -- is coming off knee surgery and will want a hefty contract.
sainthawk29 wrote:I could see it, if JS and PC has this in mind...
Revis and Sherman on the outside.... seriously that is terrifying to think about.
Granted Revis to my knowledge has never played extensively press coverage, but if they want him I trust they believe they can do it.
Browner moves to SS.
Kam moves to Will.
I don't know if that would work, but if they are really interested I assume that would be the plan. Browner IMO would be a liablity in the slot, as it would take away his greatest strenght.
sainthawk29 wrote:I could see it, if JS and PC has this in mind...
Revis and Sherman on the outside.... seriously that is terrifying to think about.
Granted Revis to my knowledge has never played extensively press coverage, but if they want him I trust they believe they can do it.
Browner moves to SS.
Kam moves to Will.
I don't know if that would work, but if they are really interested I assume that would be the plan. Browner IMO would be a liablity in the slot, as it would take away his greatest strenght.
sainthawk29 wrote:I could see it, if JS and PC has this in mind...
Revis and Sherman on the outside.... seriously that is terrifying to think about.
Granted Revis to my knowledge has never played extensively press coverage, but if they want him I trust they believe they can do it.
Browner moves to SS.
Kam moves to Will.
I don't know if that would work, but if they are really interested I assume that would be the plan. Browner IMO would be a liablity in the slot, as it would take away his greatest strenght.
Basis4day wrote:sainthawk29 wrote:I could see it, if JS and PC has this in mind...
Revis and Sherman on the outside.... seriously that is terrifying to think about.
Granted Revis to my knowledge has never played extensively press coverage, but if they want him I trust they believe they can do it.
Browner moves to SS.
Kam moves to Will.
I don't know if that would work, but if they are really interested I assume that would be the plan. Browner IMO would be a liablity in the slot, as it would take away his greatest strenght.
"We usually try not to move Pro Bowl players to different positions," - John Schneider
sainthawk29 wrote:Basis4day wrote:sainthawk29 wrote:I could see it, if JS and PC has this in mind...
Revis and Sherman on the outside.... seriously that is terrifying to think about.
Granted Revis to my knowledge has never played extensively press coverage, but if they want him I trust they believe they can do it.
Browner moves to SS.
Kam moves to Will.
I don't know if that would work, but if they are really interested I assume that would be the plan. Browner IMO would be a liablity in the slot, as it would take away his greatest strenght.
"We usually try not to move Pro Bowl players to different positions," - John Schneider
John Schneider admitted last year if Mark Barron was availible they would have selected him and tried to move Kam to Will..... Kam was a Pro Bowler.
Missing_Clink wrote:sainthawk29 wrote:I could see it, if JS and PC has this in mind...
Revis and Sherman on the outside.... seriously that is terrifying to think about.
Granted Revis to my knowledge has never played extensively press coverage, but if they want him I trust they believe they can do it.
Browner moves to SS.
Kam moves to Will.
I don't know if that would work, but if they are really interested I assume that would be the plan. Browner IMO would be a liablity in the slot, as it would take away his greatest strenght.
Hah, I was just about to lay out this exact Madden scenario!
This cannot be a legit rumor though, can it? That would be absolutely insane. What happens when Sherm needs his second contract and Revis is on the team? You guys know Sherm wants to get paid, and he is not going to take much, if any less than what Revis is getting. Are we going to use a third of the cap on 2 CBs? Doesn't make sense...
Throwdown wrote:Basis4day wrote:sainthawk29 wrote:
"We usually try not to move Pro Bowl players to different positions," - John Schneider
John Schneider admitted last year if Mark Barron was availible they would have selected him and tried to move Kam to Will..... Kam was a Pro Bowler.
No he said things could've gotten interesting.
m0ng0 wrote:and what are we going to pay him?
bestfightstory wrote:Flynn and Browner or Lane (Jets choice) and our 2nd for Revis and the Jets 3rd.
IF and I repeat.... IF we are interested. That is what we are offering. You know it as well as I do.
bestfightstory wrote:Flynn and Browner or Lane (Jets choice) and our 2nd for Revis and the Jets 3rd.
IF and I repeat.... IF we are interested. That is what we are offering. You know it as well as I do.
sainthawk29 wrote:bestfightstory wrote:Flynn and Browner or Lane (Jets choice) and our 2nd for Revis and the Jets 3rd.
IF and I repeat.... IF we are interested. That is what we are offering. You know it as well as I do.
I highly doubt Flynn is apart of the deal. The Jets are over the cap. and already have 12+ Million invested in the position. And 7 million, and that team has 19 million in a position that doesn't have a clear starter. Their GM is a cap specialist no way he includes Flynn. It doesn't make $$$ sense.
joeshaney wrote:bestfightstory wrote:Flynn and Browner or Lane (Jets choice) and our 2nd for Revis and the Jets 3rd.
IF and I repeat.... IF we are interested. That is what we are offering. You know it as well as I do.
I don't know it.....Could be something else....might be that.....but might not.
Basis4day wrote:http://www.thenewstribune.com/2012/04/25/2119929/safety-isnt-first-on-hawks-list.html
I think i've made it pretty clear in MANY threads what i feel about moving players to new positions when they play at a pro-bowl or all-pro level at their current position.
I think many who think otherwise have a have a cake and eat it too mentality. You like Browner and Kam, but don't want to lose them if a player that is arguably better comes along and insist that the best solution is to have them switch positions. This isn't Madden. They are not going to have the same physical attributes at the new position. New position, new skill set. You have every right to suggest it, but i have every right to counter it.
This is the salary cap era. If you want to be good long term, you are going to need to mix and match what your team can excel at.
As an example We choose to have big physical corners, which means we are at risk when we play a burner WR. Whenever we do, someone will suggest moving ET to CB. No, you don't. You pick and choose your poison, and do your best to limit your vulnerabilities. We have an All-Pro safety in ET. That means he's the best, at safety.
A lot of players contracts are coming due, and many are due a big payday. We can't keep everyone we like.
SuperHawks wrote:Unless the Jets are willing to swap him for Flynn and a mid rounder I don't see it. We've got our own players who are gonna get paid soon enough so why bother giving up anything significant for a one year rental.
ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
SuperHawks wrote:Unless the Jets are willing to swap him for Flynn and a mid rounder I don't see it. We've got our own players who are gonna get paid soon enough so why bother giving up anything significant for a one year rental.
Hasselbeck wrote:SuperHawks wrote:Unless the Jets are willing to swap him for Flynn and a mid rounder I don't see it. We've got our own players who are gonna get paid soon enough so why bother giving up anything significant for a one year rental.
![]()
The Jets are trying to clear cap room, not add a big contract for a big contract.
If this happens we're giving up picks.. maybe Lane since he's cheap
Hawkspur wrote:As much as I'd love Revis on the Hawks...if we're investing stackloads of cash and high draft picks into someone elses player could we please hassle Detroit into giving us Ndamukong Suh?
joeshaney wrote:Hasselbeck wrote:SuperHawks wrote:Unless the Jets are willing to swap him for Flynn and a mid rounder I don't see it. We've got our own players who are gonna get paid soon enough so why bother giving up anything significant for a one year rental.
![]()
The Jets are trying to clear cap room, not add a big contract for a big contract.
If this happens we're giving up picks.. maybe Lane since he's cheap
You are correct, however, if they bring in Matt Flynn's 5.25 million dollar cap hit they would also be deducting Revis's $6, Sanchez's $14, and Tebow's $6 million.
That's a net decrease of almost $21 milliIon. I understand this number may be subject to cap penalty, but only if they don't find a trade partner for Tebow as I believe Sanchez can be cut at any time without penalty after he restructured last year (might be wrong on this).
ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
RolandDeschain wrote:We need an elite corner less than any other team in the league. This isn't happening, people; get real.
Hasselbeck wrote:
Idzik is going to want to build the Jets up similar to how PC/JS have built this team up - via the draft. They will want picks for Revis if he's moved.. guaranteed.
joeshaney wrote:You are correct, however, if they bring in Matt Flynn's 5.25 million dollar cap hit they would also be deducting Revis's $6, Sanchez's $14, and Tebow's $6 million.
That's a net decrease of almost $21 milliIon. I understand this number may be subject to cap penalty, but only if they don't find a trade partner for Tebow as I believe Sanchez can be cut at any time without penalty after he restructured last year (might be wrong on this).
joeshaney wrote:Hawkspur wrote:As much as I'd love Revis on the Hawks...if we're investing stackloads of cash and high draft picks into someone elses player could we please hassle Detroit into giving us Ndamukong Suh?
He's not available.
RolandDeschain wrote:We need an elite corner less than any other team in the league. This isn't happening, people; get real.
scutterhawk wrote:RolandDeschain wrote:We need an elite corner less than any other team in the league. This isn't happening, people; get real.
Yeah, and after all, Revis to the 9rs, Rams, or Cards would kinda help even the playing field in the NFC WEST.
mikeak wrote:joeshaney wrote:Hawkspur wrote:As much as I'd love Revis on the Hawks...if we're investing stackloads of cash and high draft picks into someone elses player could we please hassle Detroit into giving us Ndamukong Suh?
He's not available.
Of course Detroit that has cap issue wouldn't want to move a person underperforming his contract who is stuck in controversy every week........
It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 4:52 am