| Author |
Message |
|
Maelstrom787
|
Post subject: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:31 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 1260 Location: Delaware
|
Wut Quote: Adam Schefter @AdamSchefter Chiefs released OT Eric Winston tonight.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JKent82
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm Posts: 2828
|
|
That guy just keeps getting cut huh. Nobody wants to pay a RT. Or I guess maybe #1 pick is a tackle.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
GCrow
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:40 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:05 am Posts: 336 Location: Canada
|
|
So does the Joeckel hype restart?
Swing Albert over to RT, then go Joeckel/Fisher #1?
(or even playing the rookie at RT for a year?)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
theENGLISHseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 5:55 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am Posts: 6405
|
|
This almost certainly means Joeckel at #1.
Then work it out from there... Albert's on a one year rental so they can get a close look at him, decide if he's worthy of a longer term deal or whatever. If not, they have Joeckel who really is a natural and fine pass protector.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:33 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm Posts: 2702
|
|
@Balbert76 “@ChiefsBeef: @Balbert76 Would you be open to playing RT? And they could draft Fisher instead of Joekel who can play RT.” nope
_________________ Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pinksheets
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm Posts: 2622 Location: Seattle
|
|
Albert sounds like a real team player!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
GCrow
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 6:47 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 11, 2012 8:05 am Posts: 336 Location: Canada
|
theENGLISHseahawk wrote: This almost certainly means Joeckel at #1.
Then work it out from there... Albert's on a one year rental so they can get a close look at him, decide if he's worthy of a longer term deal or whatever. If not, they have Joeckel who really is a natural and fine pass protector. This is likely the case. However why then would KC even bother giving Albert the tag? If they cut Winston for financial reasons (or whatever) just don't re-sign Albert and draft Joeckel and both your tackles are set up long term. Just gonna have another hole possibly in one year, or (likely) have to overpay to keep Albert long term after spending the #1 pick on a RT (the same draft where you gave up the #34 pick for Alex Smith). Maybe Reid and this new front office has an, quote "their guy" coming in for cheap at tackle or something? Confusing.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Maelstrom787
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Wed Mar 06, 2013 8:16 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 1260 Location: Delaware
|
Hasselbeck wrote: @Balbert76 “@ChiefsBeef: @Balbert76 Would you be open to playing RT? And they could draft Fisher instead of Joekel who can play RT.” nope Haha, classic.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
McGruff
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:45 am |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 6:14 am Posts: 582 Location: Blaine, WA
|
|
Winston is a run blocking RT, and Andy Reid is . . . Well . . . Andy Reid.
_________________ <A>
<IMG></A>
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:11 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1451
|
GCrow wrote: theENGLISHseahawk wrote: This almost certainly means Joeckel at #1.
Then work it out from there... Albert's on a one year rental so they can get a close look at him, decide if he's worthy of a longer term deal or whatever. If not, they have Joeckel who really is a natural and fine pass protector. This is likely the case. However why then would KC even bother giving Albert the tag? If they cut Winston for financial reasons (or whatever) just don't re-sign Albert and draft Joeckel and both your tackles are set up long term. Just gonna have another hole possibly in one year, or (likely) have to overpay to keep Albert long term after spending the #1 pick on a RT (the same draft where you gave up the #34 pick for Alex Smith). Maybe Reid and this new front office has an, quote "their guy" coming in for cheap at tackle or something? Confusing. Reasons 1) Don't sign Joeckel - sign someone else 2) Sign both including a long-term deal that is cap friendly and then trade Albert over letting him hit FA and get nothing for him 3) A rookie is a rookie and you don't know what you get until you are done with training camp. Eat the two salaries for one year then let Albert go
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 9:31 am |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6649
|
|
As I recall, kearly was high on the Hawks jumping on this guy when the Texans let him go.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CALIHAWK1
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 10:06 am |
|
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm Posts: 6455 Location: Is Everything
|
|
Im not typically a lets dign every FA kind of guy but I wouldn't mind a run at him. He's familiar with zone scheme and would be an upgrade from Breno.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Maelstrom787
|
Post subject: Re: Chiefs release OT Eric Winston Posted: Thu Mar 07, 2013 7:15 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 1260 Location: Delaware
|
|
Eric Winston is a really, really good RT, honestly. Great locker room guy too.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 13 posts ] |
|
Users browsing this forum: SeatownJay and 10 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |