Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate  Chat Room

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ NFL NATION ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: An article talking about minimum cash spend - CBA related
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 1:37 pm 
* The Doc *
* The Doc *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
Posts: 8882
Location: Covington, Washington
Since it can never hurt to have as much info as possible, here is an article done on the CBA and the minimum cash spend requirement.

A lot of the info put out during the lockout about the structure of the CBA doesn't match the actual contract, at least from what I remember. Anyway, someone put together a good attempt to enlighten folks about the inner-workings of the CBA in regards to the cap.

I am no smarter for reading this but I am a thick-headed fellow, maybe it will help others.

_________________
Image
Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: An article talking about minimum cash spend - CBA related
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 3:21 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 9843
Cap numbers typically differ from money spent. IIRC, Seattle was one of the highest spending teams last year (3rd?) despite being well under their cap- that's what having a good cap number can do for you because it can raise your cap figure well above the baseline. It's a big reason why finding ways to save money can pay major dividends in future offseasons.

As far as the 89% requirement, it only requires that you spend at least 89% of the baseline amounts. So if say the baseline salary cap is $125 million but Seattle has $12 million extra coming from rollover, they floor limit only factors the $125 million number, not the $137 million figure. Or to put it another way, the 89% number is the same for every team, and is pretty easy to reach for most NFL teams.

As far as this rule creating a "spending rush", it probably won't, simply because most teams are already over the 89% requirement, and those that aren't might have to spend, at most, maybe $20 million to get there. Contracts can be manipulated to cover that threshold pretty easily. For example, if you are lagging behind in spending, you can fix that up with one big signing bonus (which hits the cap gradually but impacts the spending number immediately).


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: An article talking about minimum cash spend - CBA related
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 13, 2013 4:54 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 9230
Location: Renton Wa.
Cinncinnati, Buffalo, Arizona historically are all teams that are typically roster wages cheap, why they have never been long term competitors either. They jump up occationally but they trend to be low end.

_________________
Image

To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question..........Seahawks kick Ass !!!!
Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me...
.Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , Idiot, member of the 38 club.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN » [ NFL NATION ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Storts and 15 guests

 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.