Would Hawks sign Mark Sanchez?

He was released and just wondering as there's been been alot of talk if released he might sign here and reunite with Pete. TJack obviously re-signed and is #2. Sanchez as #3?

No. Please no!

Absolutely zero chance. If the Hawks are going to keep a 3rd QB it will be young developmental type like BJ Daniels, not a failed bit like Mark Sanchez. And Sanchez isn't going to have to settle for a #3 job anyway, there are still teams out there that could provide him a chance to compete for a starting job, as scary as that sounds.

Oh and Pete Carroll and Mark Sanchez had that little falling out thing when Sanchez left USC early, too.

Dream Team

Nope.

T-Jack is a better backup and Daniels is a good #3.

Tjack is better and cheaper. 1.3 is a bargain!

Waste of good money, IMHO

Hell to the NO!

cheese and gawd damned rice..

Lol. Why? He would surely cost more than BJ

Thanks for the laugh! I needed that.

No...why ? TJ has looked as good as backup. Sanchez I suspect after NYJ is a head case a good spot for him IMO is San Diego.

God, I hope not!

Seahawk Sailor":1kybc2h2 said:

Thanks for the laugh! I needed that.

Click to expand...

This is the only explanation that makes sense.

I'm not exactly sure what a "Dirty Sanchez" is. but I think one of those might actually be preferrable.

Imagine the troll level if Mark Sanchez won a Super Bowl ring as the 3rd string QB for the Seahawks.

I think the Internet would break.

Butt fumble!
[youtube]Vuvz15OjCVc[/youtube]

Please God this is Johanna, please give John the wisdom to ignore the possibility.

Arron Curry was a total bust, but he was still a better pick than Sanchize!