GreenBay vs Raiders

Who's watching.
Lacey looking tough.
I don't think our opener is gunna be a cake walk.
What y'all thinking?

pmedic920":kdmnkzfi said:

Who's watching.
Lacey looking tough.
I don't think our opener is gunna be a cake walk.
What y'all thinking?

Click to expand...

I think it's best not to judge a team by how they do against the Raiders....unless they lose, then judge away :lol:

Rodgers is a sneaky bastard.

Vikings went up 10-0 on the raiders in the first quarter so I dont think any result from playing the raiders will mean much. GB run defense looks terrible as usual. Their running game looks a little better I guess.

It's kind of eery watching the Packers running game. Super lightweight ZBS OL, a big slow bowling ball of a RB. It's just like Seattle's run game setup, except more extreme. And still really effective.

Seattle's speedy offense is going to blow GB's defense away. Makes me feel a lot better about how hard it will be to defend Rodgers in the current rules environment, knowing that Seattle is going to be able to score too.

^^^
Kip, glad I'm not the only one seeing potential in GBs run game.
Just as glad you think we will out score them. Least that's what I hear you saying.

That Oline looks pretty bad though. Rodgers has been running for his life after that first TD drive.

Hes only 3/9 with 49 yards.

I was surprised that the raiders came right back.
Maybe GB's Defense will be their Achilles.

pmedic920":dl77vf93 said:

I was surprised that the raiders came right back.
Maybe GB's Defense will be their Achilles.

Click to expand...

I guess MJD left after the first series. Oakland offense has gone 3 and out every drive since then I believe

WilsonMVP":3vm8585g said:

pmedic920":3vm8585g said:

I was surprised that the raiders came right back.
Maybe GB's Defense will be their Achilles.

Click to expand...

I guess MJD left after the first series. Oakland offense has gone 3 and out every drive since then I believe

Click to expand...

I kinda feel bad for Matt S. He is not looking good.

Kearly should be happy because of this ridiculous emphasis on IC Green Bay is mocking the deal and just going for 2. Thank God their defense still sucks and yes we stole Schaub's soul. Dude is done. Also Phil Simms is a joke.

peachesenregalia":3nr9to4s said:

pmedic920":3nr9to4s said:

Who's watching.
Lacey looking tough.
I don't think our opener is gunna be a cake walk.
What y'all thinking?

Click to expand...

It's gunna be a cakewalk. 0% chance GB wins game 1. I'll make any (non-monetary) bet anyone wants.

Click to expand...

I hope you are correct.

Hey, Matt Flynn sighting!

pmedic920":2kzjfjft said:

Who's watching.
Lacey looking tough.
I don't think our opener is gunna be a cake walk.
What y'all thinking?

Click to expand...

34-10 Seattle. Green Bay's OL and defense is bad. Lacy is a load but slow.

Not watching but just saw stats on NFLN. Schaub 11-21 for 61 yards!!!! Hahahaha!

Raiders are the guy that buys a hooker and goes down on her. No offense.

pmedic920":t17e49sa said:

^^^
Kip, glad I'm not the only one seeing potential in GBs run game.
Just as glad you think we will out score them. Least that's what I hear you saying.

Click to expand...

Who's denying it? Just curious, because it seems like every other Packers article I've seen all off-season has been talking about the much-improved running game Green Bay will be having this year.

Their defense is the equivalent of Don Coryells Chargers

Report today that B.J. Raji may have suffered a torn bicep. If true, he'll definitely miss the season opener against Seattle, and maybe the whole season.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap300000 ... _atl_patra