Let's Talk Mariners

Discuss any and all sports-related topics. From the College Sports to Baseball and everything in between. RATING: PG-13
Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Sun Jul 07, 2013 10:07 pm
  • CPHawk wrote:
    425HawkSpark wrote:That's it I'm getting a Seager jersey I hope we hold on too him.


    He's as good as gone. Pick a one year wonder at pitcher, and expect him to be traded for said pitcher. The following will happen, Seager will be a solid 300 hitter avg 20-30 hr a year, and the pitcher will stink up Safeco for 3 years.


    There is absolutely no reason to trade Seager. He won't be arbitration eligible until 2015 and for our inability to sign FA batters he will be paid dearly for his services. Our ownership has never had a problem with re-signing players who have shined in our system.
    SUPER BOWL 48 CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!!

    RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
    User avatar
    SonicHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7009
    Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Mon Jul 08, 2013 7:49 am
  • 4 of 6 from the Rangers and Reds on the road? I will take that! No way we trade Seager, he is IMO the nucleus of the rebuild, we have young promising arms down on the farm and offense is what we need.
    User avatar
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2582
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
    Location: Battle Ground, Wa


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:34 am
  • We keep the young players that are proving themselves and trade off the ones that fail. Seager is part of the core..Smoak is playing better and we don't have a minor leaguer as good as he is , so he stays. Ackerly does not have the arm for the outfield and seems lost. I would be willing to let him go as well as any vets we have that are up at the end of the season. Montero I would see what we could get but inclined to keep him as a DH unless we get a good offer.
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1858
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Mon Jul 08, 2013 10:53 am
  • I have to be honest, I am not hating the infield right now. Smoak/Miller/Franklin/Seager is playing nicely. Not out of this world, but like an actual group of MLB infielders.

    It's too bad that the outfield is such a wreck.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3457
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Mon Jul 08, 2013 8:46 pm
  • Geez at this rate Smoak might actually see light at the end of my doghouse before the end of the year. It won't be pitch black anyways.


    Great game Smoak!
    _________________
    ...and with one kiss of his bicep he proved, without a shadow of doubt, that he was every bit as much of a DBag as his coach, and most of his team's fanbase. Finally, he could call himself a Niner!
    User avatar
    Trenchbroom
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
    *SILVER SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 1742
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:47 am
    Location: Spokangeles


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:30 am
  • If we can solidify the pitching rotation well be ok.

    We had a handfull of bad performances this year 3-5.

    Beat some great teams this year!
    Image
    Cassius Marsh is my 2014 Adopt a Pro Bowl Rookie
    User avatar
    Atradees
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2530
    Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm
    Location: South of Heaven


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:57 am
  • Seem to be playing a LOT more consistent ball here right into the all-star break. Teams usually fall apart or get hot immediately after the break, so here is to hoping for the latter. A .500 season is still a flickering hope (we've been playing .500 ball for about a month now), we just need to go on a tear and get back into mediocrity.
    "The problem with the internet is, that one can never trust the authenticity of a source." - Abraham Lincoln
    User avatar
    Hawker
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 281
    Joined: Thu Nov 03, 2011 4:59 pm
    Location: Pewyallup


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 5:40 am
  • Trenchbroom wrote:Geez at this rate Smoak might actually see light at the end of my doghouse before the end of the year. It won't be pitch black anyways.


    Great game Smoak!

    :13:
    From the white sands
    To the canyon lands
    To the redwood stands
    To the barren lands

    Image
    User avatar
    hawksfansinceday1
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10745
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:49 am
  • SonicHawk wrote:
    CPHawk wrote:
    425HawkSpark wrote:That's it I'm getting a Seager jersey I hope we hold on too him.


    He's as good as gone. Pick a one year wonder at pitcher, and expect him to be traded for said pitcher. The following will happen, Seager will be a solid 300 hitter avg 20-30 hr a year, and the pitcher will stink up Safeco for 3 years.


    There is absolutely no reason to trade Seager. He won't be arbitration eligible until 2015 and for our inability to sign FA batters he will be paid dearly for his services. Our ownership has never had a problem with re-signing players who have shined in our system.


    Its just people having a moan with no substance somehow trading one top prospect (Adam Jones) signifies a decade of trading young talent away.

    Nice to Smoak making the most of this chance the Ms clearly realize he is important to their future and need him to come good, even average
    User avatar
    Uncle Si
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4630
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:34 am


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 9:58 am
  • Is it time to say goodbye to Guti?

    I mean he's awsome when he's actually on the field but man, dude would pull a tricept clapping his hands..
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3877
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 10:45 am

Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:20 pm
  • SonicHawk wrote:
    CPHawk wrote:
    425HawkSpark wrote:That's it I'm getting a Seager jersey I hope we hold on too him.


    He's as good as gone. Pick a one year wonder at pitcher, and expect him to be traded for said pitcher. The following will happen, Seager will be a solid 300 hitter avg 20-30 hr a year, and the pitcher will stink up Safeco for 3 years.


    There is absolutely no reason to trade Seager. He won't be arbitration eligible until 2015 and for our inability to sign FA batters he will be paid dearly for his services. Our ownership has never had a problem with re-signing players who have shined in our system.


    It was sarcasm, but honesty our ownership needs to change. Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying. Imagine the mariners with a owner who cared and one who didn't have buffoons running the team.
    CPHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2162
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 3:47 pm
  • Justin Smoak:
    Before DL: 46G, .240, 3HR, .694OPS
    After DL: 16G .339, 4HR, .422OBP, 1.047OPS.

    Maybe all Mariners need to get hurt?
    SUPER BOWL 48 CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!!

    RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
    User avatar
    SonicHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7009
    Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 4:30 pm
  • He was running into diminishing returns before. Sometimes it's a good idea to give it a rest for a while, like when you "sleep on it"--except with pain meds. ;)
    WAS CARROL DISSED IN NFL.COM POWER RANKINGS?
    http://cover32.com/seahawks/2014/07/16/ ... -rankings/
    Follow me on Twitter: @George_OGorman
    User avatar
    Lords of Scythia
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1293
    Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:58 pm
  • im liking this offense
    Image
    User avatar
    KitsapHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 817
    Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
    Location: Behind you


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:05 pm
  • It seems to have a spark lately.
    GO HAWKS
    425HawkSpark
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 654
    Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:45 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:11 pm
  • 425HawkSpark wrote:It seems to have a spark lately.



    iwakuma shatting the bed to negate it.
    Image
    User avatar
    KitsapHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 817
    Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
    Location: Behind you


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Tue Jul 09, 2013 7:42 pm
  • Beavan is horrible.
    User avatar
    getnasty
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 876
    Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:22 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 2:59 am
  • " Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:
    Image
    Getting ready for some football
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:34 am
  • The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:

    I would be the same way if it was the hawks. Just like any time before 2000 the hawks were aweful I didn't give up on them nor willi on the mariners.
    GO HAWKS
    425HawkSpark
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 654
    Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:45 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 6:38 am
  • 425HawkSpark wrote:
    The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:

    I would be the same way if it was the hawks. Just like any time before 2000 the hawks were aweful I didn't give up on them nor willi on the mariners.


    Don't feed the troll. For some reason he has nothing better to do.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2091
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:18 am
  • jkitsune wrote:
    425HawkSpark wrote:
    The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:

    I would be the same way if it was the hawks. Just like any time before 2000 the hawks were aweful I didn't give up on them nor willi on the mariners.


    Don't feed the troll. For some reason he has nothing better to do.



    I don't think he was trolling. I thinks frustration with ownership. I'm not going to speak for Les but that's the typical consensus I get. I go to games because I really like baseball. I'm also a Dodger fan first and coming off the McCourt fiasco I completely get it. Absentee ownership that has no real interest in fielding a championship caliber team. I can see some peoples point of view on that even if I don't agree with it. Baseball is the one sport that has priven time and again that $$$$ and glam doesn't equal championships.
    User avatar
    CALIHAWK1
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
    *PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 9139
    Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
    Location: Is Everything


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:26 am
  • jkitsune wrote:
    425HawkSpark wrote:
    The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:

    I would be the same way if it was the hawks. Just like any time before 2000 the hawks were aweful I didn't give up on them nor willi on the mariners.


    Don't feed the troll. For some reason he has nothing better to do.




    Hey Cali I too am a Dodger fan from way back.

    Jits,,,,well I just don't understand paying money to someone that has no interest in putting a quality product on the field. And the Ms haven't had quality products on the field since the 90s.

    As long as you keep giving them your money they think its ok. Only way to get real change is stop paying them for a piss poor product. If your automobile repair place gave you the same kind of crappy repair and service you'd change in a heartbeat. Why not do the same with your sports product?

    Granted I stuck with the Hawks when they were poor but for the most part I could see they were trying to right the ship. I don't see that with the Mariners, they just rotate faces and provide the same crummy product every year.

    And of course like all opinions here mine has as much value as yours.

    :roll:
    Image
    Getting ready for some football
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 7:54 am
  • I'm not trolling! Listen to any radio show or read any number of articles and you will find a lot of people around the PAC NW think just like me. I love the mariners, and the last 10 years have sucked. Funny how Ruskell is hated here but somehow the MLB version of him (Armstrong and Lincoln) get a pass. And Imagine if the seahawks had 1 winning season in 10 years, and Paul Allen didn't bother coming to even 1 game? How do you think peoe would think of him.
    CPHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2162
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:49 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:09 am
  • The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:


    Well that may be true

    yeah. I got nothing.







    :les:
    Image
    User avatar
    KitsapHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 817
    Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
    Location: Behind you


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:45 am
  • I don't think the Front Office gets a pass at all. We have a majority absentee owner that they represent and as long as they are increasing the valuation of the team such as the ROOT TV deal they are happy. I suspect the minority owners mostly feel the same way it is just a investment. We just can't get rid of them. I think a lot of the problems stem from them. They only seemed to be will to spend until they got the new stadium.

    I will never forget in the late 90s Armstrong saying he wanted a team that was always competitive. This really concerned me. Having been in corporate America for a large part of my life I understand what is left out is as important as what is said. He never said winning it all was important.

    By doing so he realizes it sets expectations to do just that and anything less is viewed by fans as a failure. So we get mediocre baseball. Teams that are built on the cheap why can't we attract free agents? Because you have to overpay to get them here with a decade of losing and they won't do it.

    Remember there is no real budget in baseball. It is without a cap. The budget is just an arbitrary number they made up
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1858
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:46 am
  • KitsapHawk wrote:
    The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:


    Well that may be true

    yeah. I got nothing.







    :les:


    Oh stop it. Yes you DO: You and your widdle puppy are SO ADORABLE. ;)
    WAS CARROL DISSED IN NFL.COM POWER RANKINGS?
    http://cover32.com/seahawks/2014/07/16/ ... -rankings/
    Follow me on Twitter: @George_OGorman
    User avatar
    Lords of Scythia
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1293
    Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:32 am


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 9:53 am
  • The Radish wrote:


    Hey Cali I too am a Dodger fan from way back.



    No wonder you are angry gramps the Dodgers spent 233 million to be sub .500 :D
    In a crap division I might add :P
    User avatar
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2582
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
    Location: Battle Ground, Wa


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 10:08 am
  • Lords of Scythia wrote:
    KitsapHawk wrote:
    The Radish wrote:" Seattle has proven time and again that it will support a team through thick and thin, as long as the team shows they are trying."


    The above statement perhaps is true since they haven't been trying for years. It just shows that some people are so hooked on the game of baseball they keep showing up thinking the game will show up in Seattle even tho that bus left years ago.

    I mean look at you, listen to yourselves. Hoping for the team to get back to .500. That's truly oathetic.

    :roll:


    Well that may be true

    yeah. I got nothing.







    :les:


    Oh stop it. Yes you DO: You and your widdle puppy are SO ADORABLE. ;)


    I wish the person in the picture was me.



    I would be peter-lois.
    Image
    User avatar
    KitsapHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 817
    Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2012 11:04 pm
    Location: Behind you


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 4:49 pm
  • Hey Cali I too am a Dodger fan from way back.

    Jits,,,,well I just don't understand paying money to someone that has no interest in putting a quality product on the field. And the Ms haven't had quality products on the field since the 90s.

    As long as you keep giving them your money they think its ok. Only way to get real change is stop paying them for a piss poor product. If your automobile repair place gave you the same kind of crappy repair and service you'd change in a heartbeat. Why not do the same with your sports product?

    Granted I stuck with the Hawks when they were poor but for the most part I could see they were trying to right the ship. I don't see that with the Mariners, they just rotate faces and provide the same crummy product every year.

    And of course like all opinions here mine has as much value as yours.

    :roll:[/quote]

    If you're able to 'change sports products,' then I envy you. I live in San Francisco - if I could love the Giants, that'd be great. A relationship with a sports team goes beyond a simple business transaction. If you think that doesn't make any sense, then why did you stick with the Seahawks?

    Your opinion has as much value as mine, but that's not an excuse for what has, at times, become a pointed habit of rubbing peoples' nose in the fact that their sports team has been a miserable failure for ten years. And when you state, as you have in the past, that 'we should be ashamed of ourselves,' that goes beyond just stating an opinion that I can accept as 'equally valid.' Then it gets personal. As you yourself state, you stuck with the Hawks through the Behring years. Did you honestly think Ken Behring was trying to 'right the ship?' Did you stop going? If you stopped going, did you stop caring? Did you stop watching on TV? The next time Seahawks are bad (and it will eventually happen), will you bail? I don't think for an instant you would - you're as much a diehard as I am (and have been for longer yet).

    I get your point, Radish. But when most of your contributions to Mariners threads are to call us pathetic, I stop listening. That's not discussion, that's just throwing insults. I'm not going to stop loving the Mariners, and showing up once every several pages to announce that I should be ashamed of myself or that my fandom is pathetic doesn't generate conversation. Of course you'll post what you want, and so will I, and we will both continue to love the Hawks and live and die with that team, and I will of course keep my replies appropriate for the forum we're in.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2091
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Wed Jul 10, 2013 8:24 pm
  • jkitsune wrote:Hey Cali I too am a Dodger fan from way back.

    Jits,,,,well I just don't understand paying money to someone that has no interest in putting a quality product on the field. And the Ms haven't had quality products on the field since the 90s.

    As long as you keep giving them your money they think its ok. Only way to get real change is stop paying them for a piss poor product. If your automobile repair place gave you the same kind of crappy repair and service you'd change in a heartbeat. Why not do the same with your sports product?

    Granted I stuck with the Hawks when they were poor but for the most part I could see they were trying to right the ship. I don't see that with the Mariners, they just rotate faces and provide the same crummy product every year.

    And of course like all opinions here mine has as much value as yours.

    :roll:


    If you're able to 'change sports products,' then I envy you. I live in San Francisco - if I could love the Giants, that'd be great. A relationship with a sports team goes beyond a simple business transaction. If you think that doesn't make any sense, then why did you stick with the Seahawks?

    Your opinion has as much value as mine, but that's not an excuse for what has, at times, become a pointed habit of rubbing peoples' nose in the fact that their sports team has been a miserable failure for ten years. And when you state, as you have in the past, that 'we should be ashamed of ourselves,' that goes beyond just stating an opinion that I can accept as 'equally valid.' Then it gets personal. As you yourself state, you stuck with the Hawks through the Behring years. Did you honestly think Ken Behring was trying to 'right the ship?' Did you stop going? If you stopped going, did you stop caring? Did you stop watching on TV? The next time Seahawks are bad (and it will eventually happen), will you bail? I don't think for an instant you would - you're as much a diehard as I am (and have been for longer yet).

    I get your point, Radish. But when most of your contributions to Mariners threads are to call us pathetic, I stop listening. That's not discussion, that's just throwing insults. I'm not going to stop loving the Mariners, and showing up once every several pages to announce that I should be ashamed of myself or that my fandom is pathetic doesn't generate conversation. Of course you'll post what you want, and so will I, and we will both continue to love the Hawks and live and die with that team, and I will of course keep my replies appropriate for the forum we're in.[/quote]
    Good post. We will love the team that we call ours. But being called pathetic for it, is rather personal. Shall we continue a mariner thread in the shack Raddish?
    GO HAWKS
    425HawkSpark
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 654
    Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2012 5:45 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 12:38 am
  • I agree. We should stop giving the Mariners any money. Drop attendance down to near zero, even less than it is now, don't buy a single piece of merchandise, make it a horrible unprofitable business here in Seattle. I don't see how that could backfire.

    Frankly, the people who come by here every day to tell us that we shouldn't care about the Mariners should just find something better to do. I'd rather read through NinerLifer's entire post history than see someone go holier than thou on a message board dedicated to a team that has been awful far more than it has been good tell us that we all better run for the hills. God forbid the young prospects on the major league roster showing promise, the improved offense as of late, the wealth of other prospects in the waiting, etc. give anybody something to be hopeful for or even something to talk about. If you're not a Mariners fan at all, great, stay out. Honestly, Radish, your posts in this thread might be worse than just about anything I've seen on this board. Now post some waggy finger emoties at us and feel lonely.
    User avatar
    pinksheets
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2832
    Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2011 3:47 pm
    Location: Seattle


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:36 am
  • If they finish .500, I will be exceedingly happy. That means that they played better than .500 ball - maybe even .550, or potential playoff ball - for the back half of the season, which would almost surely coincide with Franklin, Miller, etc. getting better/staying good.

    I would love to see them play some October baseball this year like everyone else would, but we need to take baby steps. If the Ms win even 80 games considering the start they got off to and Miller/Franklin/Seager/Smoak looks like a legitimately good infield that we can contend for a wild card with next year, I would be happy. I don't think that's pathetic.

    Also, Radish, I disagree that the management doesn't care about putting a quality product on the field. They spent 100M to lose 100 games. They have tried to put a good product on the field. The issue here is not money. Nintendo is not the McCourts putting everyone in their family on the payroll to suck the franchise dry. The issue is that the GM hires have not worked out for us since Pat Gillick and on through to Bavasi and Jack Z.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3457
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:05 am
  • They have not spent 100 million to lose 100 games. For instance last year the the budget was 58 million. This year it will be less still. The last time it was a 100 million was 5 years ago.

    I would like to see a winning baseball team. It is good to see some of the younger players able to play at least the major league average.
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1858
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:12 am
  • Happypuppy wrote:They have not spent 100 million to lose 100 games. For instance last year the the budget was 58 million. This year it will be less still. The last time it was a 100 million was 5 years ago.

    I would like to see a winning baseball team. It is good to see some of the younger players able to play at least the major league average.


    Yes they did. They spent over 100M on payroll in 2008 and lost over 100 games.

    The payroll this year is 73M. http://espn.go.com/mlb/team/salaries/_/name/sea/seattle-mariners The Mariners have not spent 58M on their team in some time. They spent 78M last year, but rumors are that they are willing to raise the payroll again. Before that, they spent over 90M in 2009, 2010, and 2011. http://www.lookoutlanding.com/2011/8/29/2391673/seattle-mariners-2012-payroll-salary

    Remember that the Ms have TRIED to spend money. They tried to bring in Josh Hamilton. They tried to bring in Prince Fielder. Hitters didn't want to come here because the perception is that hitters die here (see Beltre, who was still a good hitter but was better in friendlier parks in LA and Arlington). That's why they moved in the fences.

    Your payroll numbers are incorrect, however. The Ms management may be many things, but cheap sure as heck isn't one of them.
    Last edited by Smelly McUgly on Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:14 am, edited 1 time in total.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3457
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:13 am
  • I love the Mariners and am disgusted with ownership. It's not impossible to separate the two.

    Since ownership is completely happy sitting back and owning the team whether they win or lose, boycotting or not going to a game won't make a difference. So that's futile. But mocking them, criticizing their absence and lack of accountability to the city is fair game. Shultz and Behring opened my eyes to the importance of ownership and that's why I never take it for granted with Allen. No amount of re-branding, promotionals, or replays of games in 1995 are going to change my opinion of them. Even if it's just that they don't know how to put people in place that can win, that's a problem. I'll always follow the team, despite lackluster ownership. Hopefully we run into some wins and can celebrate some new success. The fanbase deserves it.
    Tall men come down to my height when I hit 'em in the body.

    Jack Dempsey
    User avatar
    Fuzzman55
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1566
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 3:10 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:19 am
  • RE: Offensive players not wanting to play here - that's why it's nice to see Kendrys Morales and Raul Ibanez have some success here. Maybe hitters will think that moving in the fences fixed everything and thus be more willing to sign here.

    We need FA outfielders that can play decent defense, draw walks, and hit line drives. If we could fill two of LF/CF/RF with guys like that and two of Ramirez/Hultzen/Paxton/Walker are ready next year, this team can make the playoffs. I don't think that's overly-hopeful.
    "He's a *****. It's not that he was a *****, he is a *****, and that's why he hasn't won anything."
    User avatar
    Smelly McUgly
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3457
    Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2013 2:30 pm
    Location: God's Country AKA Cascadia AKA The Pacific Northwest


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 10:20 am
  • 425HawkSpark wrote:
    jkitsune wrote:Hey Cali I too am a Dodger fan from way back.

    Jits,,,,well I just don't understand paying money to someone that has no interest in putting a quality product on the field. And the Ms haven't had quality products on the field since the 90s.

    As long as you keep giving them your money they think its ok. Only way to get real change is stop paying them for a piss poor product. If your automobile repair place gave you the same kind of crappy repair and service you'd change in a heartbeat. Why not do the same with your sports product?

    Granted I stuck with the Hawks when they were poor but for the most part I could see they were trying to right the ship. I don't see that with the Mariners, they just rotate faces and provide the same crummy product every year.

    And of course like all opinions here mine has as much value as yours.

    :roll:


    If you're able to 'change sports products,' then I envy you. I live in San Francisco - if I could love the Giants, that'd be great. A relationship with a sports team goes beyond a simple business transaction. If you think that doesn't make any sense, then why did you stick with the Seahawks?

    Your opinion has as much value as mine, but that's not an excuse for what has, at times, become a pointed habit of rubbing peoples' nose in the fact that their sports team has been a miserable failure for ten years. And when you state, as you have in the past, that 'we should be ashamed of ourselves,' that goes beyond just stating an opinion that I can accept as 'equally valid.' Then it gets personal. As you yourself state, you stuck with the Hawks through the Behring years. Did you honestly think Ken Behring was trying to 'right the ship?' Did you stop going? If you stopped going, did you stop caring? Did you stop watching on TV? The next time Seahawks are bad (and it will eventually happen), will you bail? I don't think for an instant you would - you're as much a diehard as I am (and have been for longer yet).

    I get your point, Radish. But when most of your contributions to Mariners threads are to call us pathetic, I stop listening. That's not discussion, that's just throwing insults. I'm not going to stop loving the Mariners, and showing up once every several pages to announce that I should be ashamed of myself or that my fandom is pathetic doesn't generate conversation. Of course you'll post what you want, and so will I, and we will both continue to love the Hawks and live and die with that team, and I will of course keep my replies appropriate for the forum we're in.

    Good post. We will love the team that we call ours. But being called pathetic for it, is rather personal. Shall we continue a mariner thread in the shack Raddish?[/quote]


    You poor babys get so bent out of shape if someone disagrees with you. lol You expect to say what you want but heaven forbid someone else says what they think if you don't agree.

    Your opinions, my opinions=same value.

    If you can keep saying you love the Ms I keep saying I don't like them. Strangely enough I don't like them because of the way they treat you the fan. You don't like me because I have a different take than you. Yes I think they suck and have for a long time.

    You need thicker skin if you want to be a Mariners fan.

    :roll:

    :roll:
    Image
    Getting ready for some football
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:03 am
  • If you genuinely don't understand the difference between disagreeing and insulting, and how this applies to the posts you have been making, then there is no honest discourse to be had on this topic.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2091
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:05 am

Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:34 am
  • jkitsune wrote:If you genuinely don't understand the difference between disagreeing and insulting, and how this applies to the posts you have been making, then there is no honest discourse to be had on this topic.



    So my disagrements are insults? But yours aren't right?? lol

    I certainly do understand the difference between disagrements and insults. I disagree with your opinion which is my right. I'm insulted that the Mariners treat their fans so badly.

    And if you don't think they are treating you badly, I feel for you but accept you want to love your baseball. I too used to feel that way. When I was growing up there was always a game on, didn't matter who was playing you were glad to listen to anyone.

    But the players strikes and attitudes and off the field problems got to me and after the last strike they lost me forever. Not the players as much as the owners but still pretty close. So if you think my not liking the way they do things is insulting,,,so what? Everyone on this board has an opinion and if you want me to accept yours then you have to accept mine.

    I laugh at you kids that come in here and get all insulted if someone doesn't love the teams you love. This is a sports board for Christ's sake not your back yard.
    Image
    Getting ready for some football
    User avatar
    The Radish
    * NET Radish *
     
    Posts: 18347
    Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
    Location: Spokane, Wa.


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:33 pm
  • So this Steve Delabar guy that made the allstar game.. how did we let him go? Trade him for a bag of potato chips? just release him ?

    I don't follow the Ms much but i'd like to know what happend here hah.
    4/27/13 - I was there #humblethug
    "He looked like a bad man," Sherman said, "and I knew we were alright."
    User avatar
    TheRealDTM
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 847
    Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 4:26 pm
    Location: Bellingham, WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 2:36 pm
  • TheRealDTM wrote:So this Steve Delabar guy that made the allstar game.. how did we let him go? Trade him for a bag of potato chips? just release him ?

    I don't follow the Ms much but i'd like to know what happend here hah.


    All I could find was that he was involved in a trade that brought Eric Thames here, and was sent to the Jays.

    Yup
    ----------------------------
    "Plus I hate the seattle stadium the **** place is too loud, gave me a headache watchin the game." ~ Some 9er fan
    User avatar
    JOz56
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 745
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 11:52 am
    Location: Spokane WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 6:23 pm
  • Mariners are notorious for trading players that end up being productive for other teams. R.A. Dickey won a CY Young but couldn't do squat when he was here. Doug Fister was a good pitcher here but they traded him for bag of manure, Michael Pineda for a PED user in Triple AAA who can't hit or catch. Adam Jones and bunch of others for Bedard. Shin-Choo Soo, Asdrubal Cabrera to Cleveland for Franklin G. (never healthy).
    User avatar
    hawkfan68
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 3396
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am
    Location: Sammamish, WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:28 pm
  • The Bedard one still pisses me off.
    ----------------------------
    "Plus I hate the seattle stadium the **** place is too loud, gave me a headache watchin the game." ~ Some 9er fan
    User avatar
    JOz56
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 745
    Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 11:52 am
    Location: Spokane WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Thu Jul 11, 2013 7:38 pm
  • hawkfan68 wrote:Mariners are notorious for trading players that end up being productive for other teams. R.A. Dickey won a CY Young but couldn't do squat when he was here. Doug Fister was a good pitcher here but they traded him for bag of manure, Michael Pineda for a PED user in Triple AAA who can't hit or catch. Adam Jones and bunch of others for Bedard. Shin-Choo Soo, Asdrubal Cabrera to Cleveland for Franklin G. (never healthy).


    Actually, Franklin was a pickup from the JJ Putz trade (which, on the whole, likely turned out for the best for the M's).

    Choo and Cabrera were traded for Eduardo Perez (I think his name was) and Ben Broussard by Bill Bavasi. They were atrocious trades at the time, but look positively prescient next to the Adam Jones debacle.
    User avatar
    jkitsune
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2091
    Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:12 pm


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Fri Jul 12, 2013 7:56 am
  • And yet another blown lead.. How do you contine to put up 6,7,8 runs a game and still lose.. ?
    World Champs - Sounds good don't it
    User avatar
    hawker84
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3877
    Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
    Location: Tri Cities, WA


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:20 am
  • it does not help when our starters can't clear the 5th inning in 3 of the last 4 starts. And Boston is a pretty good team.
    User avatar
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2582
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
    Location: Battle Ground, Wa


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Fri Jul 12, 2013 9:09 am
  • JOz56 wrote:
    TheRealDTM wrote:So this Steve Delabar guy that made the allstar game.. how did we let him go? Trade him for a bag of potato chips? just release him ?

    I don't follow the Ms much but i'd like to know what happend here hah.


    All I could find was that he was involved in a trade that brought Eric Thames here, and was sent to the Jays.

    Yup

    To be fair, at the time of the trade Delabar was atrocious. He gave up a bomb just about every time he made an appearance. I was actually surprised anyone would give up so much as a bag of balls for him. I was actually an advocate of flat out releasing him. He throws hard, and obviously learned how to keep the ball down and developed an offspeed pitch of some sort.
    pcbball12
    NET Starter
     
    Posts: 389
    Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2011 7:14 am


Re: Let's Talk Mariners
Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:11 am
  • and its always easy to criticize these trades in hindsight, especially when you have a bone to pick to begin with.
    User avatar
    m0ng0
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2582
    Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 1:55 pm
    Location: Battle Ground, Wa


PreviousNext


It is currently Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:20 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE SPORTS BAR ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests