Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ THE NET LOUNGE ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:18 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14056
Location: Kirkland, WA
J, Utah's definitely got a lot of beauty; but much of the southwest also has a fair bit of that, too. Rain forest, mountains, (including the spot that gets more annual snowfall than any other place on Earth; Mount Rainier) desert, ocean, hot springs, and a moderate climate in a major urban area; no other place in the country has all of these things.

I'm not saying Washington is the best state in the country. It's not. However, I am saying it's the most scenic. It's got the largest variety of scenery, and that part's not even debatable. Name another state with as many different major scenic areas.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:20 pm 
NET Pro Bowler
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 12:38 pm
Posts: 16399
Location: SoCal
California rivals Washington for scenic beauty for sure.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:29 pm 
NET Starter
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:47 pm
Posts: 342
RolandDeschain wrote:
I already had all the visual proof I needed that Oklahoma sucks years ago. Just look at it.

Image


Looks like eastern washington without mountains in the distance


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:31 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 6209
Location: Is Everything
Largent80 wrote:
California rivals Washington for scenic beauty for sure.


When the sun is out Seattle and western Wa. is by far the most scenic place in the U.S. Unfortunately that's only half the time. Smog excludes SoCal from the conversation.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:49 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15412
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
RolandDeschain wrote:
Rain forest, mountains, desert, ocean, hot springs, and a moderate climate in a major urban area; no other place in the country has all of these things.


Oregon's got all those things.

I wasnt certain about Rain Forest, because I have always heard that the Olympic Peninsula is the only rain forest in the U.S. but apparently thats just you Washingtonian's spreading misinformation. Internet research shows that Washington, Oregon, and Northern California all have Temperate rain forest.

Apparently there's also small area's of rain forest in the southern Appalachian mountains in North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:57 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14056
Location: Kirkland, WA
JSeahawks wrote:
I wasnt certain about Rain Forest, because I have always heard that the Olympic Peninsula is the only rain forest in the U.S. but apparently thats just you Washingtonian's spreading misinformation. Internet research shows that Washington, Oregon, and Northern California all have Temperate rain forest.

Apparently there's also small area's of rain forest in the southern Appalachian mountains in North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee.


That's because WA state is the only place that has real rain forest in the U.S. An urban block-sized piece here or there doesn't count. Ignoring the "forest" part of "rain forest" to get by on a technicality is rubbish. It's like how Seattlites call what happens here during the winter "rain". It's not rain, it's misting the vast majority of the time, occasionally reaching "light rain" status, and once in a great while, warranting being called actual "rain".

You remind me of some of the people I knew in Wisconsin. They thought they had some mountains there, in the state of Wisconsin; because some places were called "Mount so-and-so", and actually managed to get higher than 50 feet above street level in Milwaukee or Madison. That doesn't turn your little wannabe mole hill into a mountain, even if it might meet some obscure technical definition for one. :)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 2:57 pm 
* NET X's & O's Guru *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 6772
Location: PNW
memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1010

That's the best proof we have

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:02 pm 
* NET Moderator *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm
Posts: 15412
Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
RolandDeschain wrote:
JSeahawks wrote:
I wasnt certain about Rain Forest, because I have always heard that the Olympic Peninsula is the only rain forest in the U.S. but apparently thats just you Washingtonian's spreading misinformation. Internet research shows that Washington, Oregon, and Northern California all have Temperate rain forest.

Apparently there's also small area's of rain forest in the southern Appalachian mountains in North Carolina, Georgia and Tennessee.


You remind me of some of the people I knew in Wisconsin. They thought they had some mountains there, in the state of Wisconsin; because some places were called "Mount so-and-so", and actually managed to get higher than 50 feet above street level in Milwaukee or Madison. That doesn't turn your little wannabe mole hill into a mountain, even if it might meet some obscure technical definition for one. :)


Whatevs...
Image

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:10 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14056
Location: Kirkland, WA
J, meet Cascade Mountain, one of Wisconsin's premier skiing places. I'm 100% serious, here's their website: http://www.cascademountain.com/

Here it is. No, this isn't a trick, or a joke; this little mosquito-bump of a hill is "Cascade Mountain", 30 minutes from Madison. I've driven by it a hundred times in my life, and every single time, I've exhibited a laugh, snort, smirk, or giggle, depending on the circumstances. This is the definition of a "ski resort" for Wisconsinites.

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:18 pm 
* NET Philistine *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10337
Location: Portland, OR
RolandDeschain wrote:
J, meet Cascade Mountain, one of Wisconsin's premier skiing places. I'm 100% serious, here's their website: http://www.cascademountain.com/

Here it is. No, this isn't a trick, or a joke; this little mosquito-bump of a hill is "Cascade Mountain", 30 minutes from Madison. I've driven by it a hundred times in my life, and every single time, I've exhibited a laugh, snort, smirk, or giggle, depending on the circumstances. This is the definition of a "ski resort" for Wisconsinites.

Image


Last time I was back in Wisconsin, I saw the sign for this while my wife and I were driving to Watertown to my grandparents, and I made the
mistake of looking up 5 degrees. Needless to say I missed it.

_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:20 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14056
Location: Kirkland, WA
Sarlacc, I'm truly and honestly sorry that you have to visit Wisconsin to see family.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:26 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 3:48 pm
Posts: 697
Location: Oklahoma City
Hell, you should see "Mt." Scott here, it makes me laugh.

_________________
2013 AAR: Chris Harper


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:32 pm 
* NET Philistine *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 10337
Location: Portland, OR
RolandDeschain wrote:
Sarlacc, I'm truly and honestly sorry that you have to visit Wisconsin to see family.


Bet it makes you cringe to find out that I have to go back for a week this year to show my kid off to multiple sets of grandparents. Great way to spend my vacation time and a couple thousand dollars. :179419: (except, in this case, that's not a whistle.)

_________________
My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 3:41 pm 
* NET Expertise Expert *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:39 am
Posts: 14056
Location: Kirkland, WA
Tell those country bumpkins to retire to the northwest if they want to see their grandkid(s).


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 4:22 pm 
* NET Starfish *
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 6:29 am
Posts: 8747
Location: Vaes Dothrak
AbsolutNET wrote:
http://www.seahawks.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1010

That's the best proof we have


Think you're funny, don't you?

_________________
FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ FrankerZ


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 5:08 pm 
NET Rookie
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 3:38 am
Posts: 151
Location: North Pole, Alaska
Image

_________________
90% Disabled Veteran
100% Love for the USA!


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:32 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11283
Location: Graham, WA
peachesenregalia wrote:
AbsolutNET wrote:
http://www.seahawks.net/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&u=1010

That's the best proof we have


Think you're funny, don't you?


I chuckled.

Arizona & Montana >>>> Washington though.

_________________
Image
Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 12:43 pm 
* NET Radish *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 14136
Location: Spokane, Wa.
I'm not sure if its Oklahoma sucks or the fact that Texas blows.

:141847_bnono:

_________________
Image
Still missing you everyday pal.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Visual proof that Oklahoma sucks....
 Post Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 3:38 pm 
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
*PLATINUM SUPPORTER*
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 7:00 pm
Posts: 6209
Location: Is Everything
I lived in Bakersfield Ca. which sucks bad and it was mainly because it is the second richest concentration of okies second only to oklahoma. They migrated during the dust bowl, settled and made it suck.


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Board index » THE NET NATION LOUNGE » [ THE NET LOUNGE ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Riley12 and 17 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.