| Author |
Message |
|
canzag
|
Post subject: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field  Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:15 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 7:53 am
Posts: 492
|
|
Do it with him.Match up Sherman vs Fitz all game long and put WT3 on the other side.Do it with the other teams best WR until his suspension starts
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
hawker84
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:21 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2012 2:22 pm
Posts: 2090
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
my take on the whole thing is, only thing you lose with browner is size and physical ability.. jamming at the line, the size to go up for the ball with the taller recievers.. cover wise, i think thurmond has shown to be better....
i agree with the OP, lock sherman on Fitz, thurmond on next guy, and the nickle, well it is what it is...
_________________
On to the Next Episode
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawkfan333
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:27 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2010 5:58 pm
Posts: 265
|
|
thurmond is still a good corner and was actually was the starter when trufant got hurt until he then got hurt i think he will do fine i am more worried about if or when sherman gets suspended
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawk Strap
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:29 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 3:37 pm
Posts: 1714
Location: Tri Cities, WA
|
|
Sherman plays one side. Browner the other, regardless of who is across from them.
I don't know if Pete will change that.
_________________
"it'd be a newborn deer" - pehawk
|
|
| |
|
|
|
12evanf
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 1713
|
|
Browner's got speed. He's run from behind and made tackles numerous times to save plays. If Sherman's our #1, Browner's our #1A. Out of WTIII, Browner, Chancellor, and ET I think Chancellor could be the weakest link this week in our secondary if Thurmond plays up to expectations. Not that Chancellor's bad.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeaMeat
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:03 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 1:16 pm
Posts: 1008
Location: Deer Valley/Phoenix
|
|
With Sherman of Fitz and if the defense could actually show up and create some pass rush that will keep Skelton running for his life, then there will be a lot of 3 and outs for AZ, while forcing them to run more..... we just have to protect the outside of the oline against the run.
_________________
It was a catch.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:24 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7356
|
|
This is why we have Earl. We aren't changing our secondary philosophy for Fitz.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkWow
|
Post subject: Re: Sherman should cover fitz all over the field Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:28 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 03, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 993
Location: The 5-0
|
|
...Or even better, we should trade Sherman for Fitz.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
  |
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
