vin.couve12 wrote:BEHOLD!
This is fantastic!
Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:04 pm
-
This is fantastic!- CurryStopstheRuns
- NET Veteran
- Posts: 3092
- Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:06 pm
-
Interesting........lets see how it plays out for Sherm.
-
Blitzer88 - * NET Eeyore *
- Posts: 12335
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Wed Dec 12, 2012 11:55 pm
-
any thoughts to the NFL.com article calling for a Seattle-GB matchup as #1 on christmas list? They probably realize we don't make it without Sherman (possibly) and thus want to make sure we make it into the playoffs giving us the "dream" re-match.
Thoughts
-
falcongoggles - NET Veteran
- Posts: 4764
- Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 1:46 pm
- Location: Phoenix, AZ
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:36 am
-
Zebulon Dak wrote:Largent80 wrote:If we ever needed the power of Tanzania it is NOW.
The 12th Land will provide.
The 12th land on the 12th day on the 12th....ehhh u get it
-
dunceface - NET Veteran
- Posts: 3683
- Joined: Fri Aug 12, 2011 10:29 am
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:53 am
-
Evil_Shenanigans wrote:Umm shouldn't the title of this read appeal instead of suspension?
Yeah there is really no news here.
suspension has not been pushed back till next season. Not even sure where the OP got that idea from the article.
BUT, sure hope that this does happen!- shayatin
- NET Bench Warmer
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Thu Nov 01, 2012 9:55 am
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:13 am
-
sutz wrote:Let's not get ahead of ourselves, here. I see a lot of "ifs" and "coulds" in there. I'm hopeful this is good news, but I'll believe it when it happens.
- hawksfansinceday1
- NET Ring Of Honor
- Posts: 20876
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:38 am
- Location: Vancouver, WA
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:27 am
-
Oh happy days!
-
ParisPC07 - NET Starter
- Posts: 456
- Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 3:14 pm
- Location: Mountain Home, Idaho
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:39 am
-
CurryStopstheRuns wrote:vin.couve12 wrote:BEHOLD!
This is fantastic!
loved that movie as a kid.- jlwaters1
- NET Veteran
- Posts: 2680
- Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 4:48 pm
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:56 am
-
Sports Hernia wrote:I think Rog is tired of getting sued by players.
What's a rog?- zayden185
- NET Veteran
- Posts: 599
- Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 11:04 am
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:57 am
-
Sprfunk wrote:makkapakka wrote:First off let me say that I'm as pumped and jacked about a good young Seahawks team as anyone.
That being said, maybe I'm way off but how many people here think Sherman has been falsely accused and has a legit appeal vs him and the 'Hawks working the system to stagger the suspensions. Browner seems to have accepted his guilt.
There is a reason why this stuff is banned. Have a google of 'Adderall dangerous side effects'. If some guys get away with it, then more guys will get away with it, and eventually virtually everyone in the league will have to keep up with the joneses. Worst though would be the pressure on up-and-coming-kids to keep up, most of whom will never see the NFL.
If he's guilty the thing to do man up about it. A public apology would be a good start (perhaps I missed it but I didn't hear one from Browner?). If he's guilty I think it's lame to work the appeal system and pretend otherwise.
The court system is screwed up anyway. It rewards Prosecuting Attorney's for getting fast results, and often times (IMHO its more often they we would like to admit) people take plea deals when innocent and plead guilty as to not risk getting the max penalty. Don't believe me? Look up Brian Banks.
I don't know what to think either way, but I don't need a public apology, and am not about to condemn anyone without being shown proof.
1. This isn't in the courts.
2. This isn't a criminal matter. There is no prosecutor.
3. This isn't at all similar in any way shape or form to what happened to Brian Banks.
4. Google "Straw Man Argument"Give me some damn skittles...-
Basis4day - .NOW with Modership
- Posts: 5696
- Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:00 am
-
jlwaters1 wrote:CurryStopstheRuns wrote:vin.couve12 wrote:BEHOLD!
This is fantastic!
loved that movie as a kid.
On December 21st,
I heard Red Bull is going to get Cru Jones to do a back flip over a Mayan calendar.GET YOUR EAR PLUGS READY!!!-
TheHawkster - * NET Bad Ass *
- Posts: 2228
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 12:00 am
- Location: Puyallup
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:08 am
-
MODS:
PLEASE edit the topic title as it's totally misleading.
I don't get ANYTHING from the linked article that indicates that either the appeal or the suspension is known to be pushed back to the 2013 season.
I haven't seen ANYTHING on any other media to suggest that the status has changed at all. We've known for a while now that Sherman has hired a lawyer, and that the December 14th date for the appeal will be moved back. We don't know ANYTHING about when that appeal will occur, and the timing of any possible suspension.
I'm really disappointed with the OP.-
BocciHawk - NET Veteran
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:14 am
-
According to Clayton, he could be suspended as early as this coming Tuesday, or as late as next year.R.I.P. THE EDGAR, YOU WILL BE MISSED......
-
SoulfishHawk - NET Veteran
- Posts: 5377
- Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 9:59 am
- Location: Sammamish, WA
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:52 am
-
Very misleading title.
"I'm not the type to let a sleeping giant lie. I wake up the giant, slap him around, make him mad and beat him to the ground. I talk a big game because I carry a big stick." --- All-Pro Stanford Graduate-
Hawken-Dazs - NET Veteran
- Posts: 600
- Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 5:50 pm
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:57 am
-
makkapakka wrote:That being said, maybe I'm way off but how many people here think Sherman has been falsely accused and has a legit appeal vs him and the 'Hawks working the system to stagger the suspensions. Browner seems to have accepted his guilt.
I don't think the team is behind this. I think these are decisions made by the individuals, in consultation with their agents and/or lawyers.
Since the players are unionized, I doubt that the team can try to lean on them to do anything outside of their own will. It's possible that they decided individually to do this for the good of the team, but that seems doubtful too. The value of their next contract, as well as other possibilities to market themselves, hangs in the balance over this stuff. They're probably going to put themselves first, and they should.-
MidwestHawker - NET Veteran
- Posts: 2047
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:26 am
- Location: Indianapolis
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:23 pm
-
The team absolutely cannot have any real impact on the situation. They aren't even really supposed to discuss it with the player. I'm sure some informal talking happens, but it's entirely between the player and the NFL.
-
BocciHawk - NET Veteran
- Posts: 1050
- Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 2:12 pm
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:54 pm
-
BocciHawk wrote:The team absolutely cannot have any real impact on the situation. They aren't even really supposed to discuss it with the player. I'm sure some informal talking happens, but it's entirely between the player and the NFL.
Is this true? I'm not saying you are wrong, I could just be ignorant of this fact, but as I understand it, the team is not allowed to discuss this publicly. I also have heard that a team cannot punish a player in any way for being suspended for PED's, but I hadn't heard that they couldn't discuss it at all with them. Just curious if this is your take or if you got this from a reporter or some other source?
“You can please some of the people all of the time, you can please all of the people some of the time, but you can’t please all of the people all of the time”
Check your PM's....We miss you -
kidhawk - * NET Staff Alumni *
- Posts: 20786
- Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
- Location: Anchorage, AK
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:28 pm
-
Hawken-Dazs wrote:Very misleading title.
YEAH- judgemint
- NET Bench Warmer
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Fri Sep 07, 2012 3:34 am
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:42 pm
-
Agree someone DEFINITELY needs to change the title - WAY misleading
BUT I enjoyed the BMX dance off - how did I miss that movie growing up? Thought the dude was Scott Baio. "It's yer JOB to know!"-
tdigitee - NET Rookie
- Posts: 285
- Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 3:50 pm
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:39 pm
-
Rad is one of the illest movies ever made...only thing that made this thread
worthwhile."... She works at the Parisian, and this is Polo season..."-
hgwellz12 - NET Veteran
- Posts: 1796
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2012 1:17 pm
-
Re: Sherman suspension pushed back to next season
Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:21 pm
-
tdigitee wrote:Agree someone DEFINITELY needs to change the title - WAY misleading
BUT I enjoyed the BMX dance off - how did I miss that movie growing up? Thought the dude was Scott Baio. "It's yer JOB to know!"
You had to have a mullet flowing in the wind in the 80s....-
vin.couve12 - NET Veteran
- Posts: 3020
- Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 10:19 am
- Location: Vancouver, WA
-
71 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • Previous 1, 2
It is currently Sun May 28, 2017 8:01 pm
Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]
Information
-
- Who is online
- Users browsing this forum: Anthony!, Baidu [Spider], Bobblehead, Digsbone, FireHawk79, Maelstrom787, Nathangwhunter, rjdriver, Slick, TVHAWK, UNCC1987, vigilantgrrl, Yahoo [Bot] and 64 guests