I have seen a few tweets, and some rumblings about Fitz for Flynn .. What do you think??? Possible? If this trade did happen, it would make the off season go by wayyyy to slow. !!!!

Better chance of my ass spontaneously combusting tomorrow afternoon

Not possible, imo. It would take a whole hell of a lot more than that to pry Fitzgerald away from Arizona - especially if he was going to a division rival. One QB prospect with 2 NFL starts won't cut it.

Fantasy Island aspect aside...Fitz is making 1.2 billion Samoleans or something like that. We can't afford it.

While I would love to have someone of Fitz's caliber, I do not want to make my enemy stronger. I also do not want to put Flynn in the same division with a possible chip on his shoulder that we would see twice a year.

Even my Madden rejected that trade as a farce.

If my grandma had wheels, she'd be a trolley!

How about Flynn for JJ Watt?

Or Megatron?

theENGLISHseahawk wrote:How about Flynn for JJ Watt?

Or Megatron?

I like your trades better! Let's do it!

theENGLISHseahawk wrote:How about Flynn for JJ Watt?

Or Megatron?

Unfortunately, that trade can't happen. Flynn is easily worth both of them, but they play for different teams. Maybe they could split Flynn? Trade off weeks?

RussWILSON3 wrote:I have seen a few tweets, and some rumblings about Fitz for Flynn .. What do you think??? Possible?

Only if they throw in Darnell Dockett.

This could be the worst Thread idea ever

Hmmmm...all world WR, for a QB that has started 2 games, and couldn't beat out rookie in camp?

Actually...not so dumb thread. They did that with Kolb already!!

I would love that but I don't see that happing I don't see the Cardinals just giving fitz away of they do decide to get rid of him.

zayden185 wrote:This could be the worst Thread idea ever

Oh, man - not even close....

RussWILSON3 wrote:I have seen a few tweets, and some rumblings about Fitz for Flynn .. What do you think??? Possible? If this trade did happen, it would make the off season go by wayyyy to slow. !!!!

If by rumblings you mean people tweeting about callers on KJR and @ tweets by fans to Pete Carroll.

A few tweets? From who, Manti T'eo's GF?

Or we could trade Flynn to a different team for a 5th or 6th round pick (because that is what you are going to get)....then trade the pick to Arizona!

I think we should trade Flynn for 52 pairs of rocket boots. Not 53 because Russell doesn't need them.

No way do we do this trade. Fitz is a mediocre at best wide receiver who has benefited from playing with some of the best NFL quarterbacks of all time while Flynn will take whatever team he chooses to 6 straight superbowl victories. Cards better throw in their entire next two drafts if we even want to debate this.

Flynn for Dockett, now you're talkin.........salaries are at least in the same ballpark.

No chance. Wouldn't make sense for either side. AZ needs help on their O-line and a credible running threat. Doesn't matter who is behind center if those areas aren't addressed. You're telling me they're going to give up the face of their franchise for a largely unproven QB who will subsequently have absolutely no weapons to throw to whatsoever? Right.

For Seattle, just doesn't make sense to sink that much money in the guy. Added depth the receiving corp. would definitely help, but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. I really hope we don't break the bank trying to address that area. Let's develop the pieces we have and add depth in the draft. If there's a good value proposition for an established WR, we should explore that as well. Absolutely no need to pay a king's ransom for a Calvin Johnson/Fitzgerald type.

Sgt. Largent wrote:Flynn for Dockett, now you're talkin.........salaries are at least in the same ballpark.

I would be down for this even though he is a douche. I just don't see it though unless we throw in a pick as well

I have a petting zoo.

pehawk wrote:I have a petting zoo.

Keep your genitalia out of this, Ryan.

pehawk wrote:I have a petting zoo.

Just because it smells like one and is marketed as a children's attraction, it doesn't make it a pettting zoo.

RussWILSON3 wrote:I have seen a few tweets, and some rumblings about Fitz for Flynn .. What do you think??? Possible? If this trade did happen, it would make the off season go by wayyyy to slow. !!!!

Maybe we can trade John Ryan for JJ Watt while we are at it.

cdallan wrote:

pehawk wrote:I have a petting zoo.

Just because it smells like one and is marketed as a children's attraction, it doesn't make it a pettting zoo.

Lulz.
The petting zoo is in his ice cream van. Sorry, I am replying to a Scottish one. An ice cream lorry.

Flynn for Calias Campbell and id do it with the quickness

tacomahawk wrote:While I would love to have someone of Fitz's caliber, I do not want to make my enemy stronger. I also do not want to put Flynn in the same division with a possible chip on his shoulder that we would see twice a year.

Are you kidding? Stronger? Flynn would not make AZ stronger if you then took away Fitzgerald. It would make us stronger but certainly the positives brought by Flynn would be offset by the gigantic hole left in Fitz's absense.

bestfightstory wrote:Even my Madden rejected that trade as a farce.

That didn't stop Philly from fleecing Arizona with Kolb.

Oh, come on guys! I built my daughter a chicken coop for her birthday. Bring the family, come pet chickens and a cocks!

Thanks for the laugh man

No, Larry Fitzgerald has a huge mega contract that I would not want to pay for.
Larry is taking up all the cap space and is the reason why the Cardinals suck.

I think its 8 year 100million dollar contract?

Of course these seems a bit unrealistic, but we could sweeten the pot. What if we threw in McCoy?

Sgt. Largent wrote:A few tweets? From who, Manti T'eo's GF?

Wow, not wasting much time there right?

On topic it just won't happen, it makes no sense and would cost us too much and impair our ability to give our core dudes extension down the road. Would do more harm then good it seems.

yeah.....I don't see this happening.

I would not want to pay larrys contract... period.. we need someon that can get seperation.. and great hands... we dont need anything more..
Quick seperation and burst...... .... so when the play breaks down wilson can find someone open.

hawks4thewin wrote:we need someon that can get seperation.. and great hands... we dont need anything more..

We don't need anything more? You just described the perfect receiver. It's not like they grow on trees, you know. Those are really the only two things that matter that every team looks for in a receiver.

therealjohncarlson wrote:Better chance of my ass spontaneously combusting tomorrow afternoon

lol...i second that.

AgentDib wrote:Of course these seems a bit unrealistic, but we could sweeten the pot. What if we threw in McCoy?

If you're going to try and get fitz from the Cards, it would literally take trading an Earl Thomas or something on those lines

Why would anyone trade Fitz for Matt Flynn and Anthony McCoy?

Honestly, if Fitzgerald was on the waiver wire I would not take him. Go to Spotrac and look at his cap hits for the next six or seven years. If we traded Flynn for Fitz, you might as well throw in Sherman and Earl, because we wouldn't have the money to extend them with that kind of contract on the books.

He also declined this year after putting up 1400 yards with the same QBs in 2011. Who's to say that decline isn't real?

AZ could end up releasing Fitz in a couple years. When that happens, I'd give him a reasonable contract. Until then, he's not worth it.

Basis4day wrote:

AgentDib wrote:Of course these seems a bit unrealistic, but we could sweeten the pot. What if we threw in McCoy?

If you're going to try and get fitz from the Cards, it would literally take trading an Earl Thomas or something on those lines

Why would anyone trade Fitz for Matt Flynn and Anthony McCoy?

Obviously counting on the stupidity of the Cardinals front office...

May I please say,,I think this is a dumb idea??

Not only is Fitz to old he's way to expensive!

Jesus Christ some of you wanting to get rid of Flynn because of money and now suggest getting someone that's MORE money??

Get a grip.

The Radish wrote:May I please say,,I think this is a dumb idea??

Not only is Fitz to old he's way to expensive!

Jesus Christ some of you wanting to get rid of Flynn because of money and now suggest getting someone that's MORE money??

Get a grip.

Get rid of a back up that's expensive is not the same as bringing someone that would actually pay that's expensive.

sturg78 wrote: Get rid of a back up that's expensive is not the same as bringing someone that would actually pay that's expensive.

Do you realize HOW expensive we're talking for Fitz?

2013: $5 million (+ $10 million option bonus due 3/15), 2014: $12.75 million, 2015: $8 million (+ $8 million roster bonus), 2016: $15 million, 2017-2018: $14.75 million, 2019: Free Agent

RussWILSON3 wrote:I have seen a few tweets, and some rumblings about Fitz for Flynn .. What do you think??? Possible? If this trade did happen, it would make the off season go by wayyyy to slow. !!!!

You need to stop following these people because they obviously no nothing about player values. On top of that, Fitz is the AZ team and his contract which was over 100M, would be hard to fit and would make it impossible to sign some of our own young stars.

New GM is going to want to make a statement on how he does stuff, I would bet he would do it, Fitz for Flynn, and Carpenter and Moffit, or something like that, they ned a QB and an offensive line.

DavidSeven wrote: but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. .

Hmm

Peyton Manning had Harrison/ Wayne
Montana had Rice
Steve Young had Rice
Marino had Duper and Clayton
Warner had Bruce and Holt
Aikman had Irvin
Bradshaw had Swann and Stalworth

Just for starters , would you like me to continue

Montana needed Taylor and Clark and Jones to compliment Rice, but point of your statement is correct, you need guys that can seperate and catch the ball.

Most also had a decent rushing attack, James with Manning, Tyler, Craig, Watters in S.F., Warner Faulk, Bradshaw Blier and some Italian guy named Harris, Smith in Dallas, Marino was the only one that really had no rushing attack, and by chance the only one on that list not to win a Superbowl.

We're in LALA land here, but, Fitz would renegotiate to get out.