 |
| Author |
Message |
|
kearly
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn?  Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:04 pm |
|
| * Mr Random Thought * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7393
|
|
Honestly, if Fitzgerald was on the waiver wire I would not take him. Go to Spotrac and look at his cap hits for the next six or seven years. If we traded Flynn for Fitz, you might as well throw in Sherman and Earl, because we wouldn't have the money to extend them with that kind of contract on the books.
He also declined this year after putting up 1400 yards with the same QBs in 2011. Who's to say that decline isn't real?
AZ could end up releasing Fitz in a couple years. When that happens, I'd give him a reasonable contract. Until then, he's not worth it.
_________________  "I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman "If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh
|
|
  |
|
|
|
Starrman44
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:07 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 28, 2012 1:35 pm
Posts: 459
Location: Canby, OR
|
Basis4day wrote: AgentDib wrote: Of course these seems a bit unrealistic, but we could sweeten the pot. What if we threw in McCoy? If you're going to try and get fitz from the Cards, it would literally take trading an Earl Thomas or something on those lines Why would anyone trade Fitz for Matt Flynn and Anthony McCoy? Obviously counting on the stupidity of the Cardinals front office...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:10 pm |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm
Posts: 14436
Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
|
May I please say,,I think this is a dumb idea??
Not only is Fitz to old he's way to expensive!
Jesus Christ some of you wanting to get rid of Flynn because of money and now suggest getting someone that's MORE money??
Get a grip.
_________________  Still missing you everyday pal.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 903
|
The Radish wrote: May I please say,,I think this is a dumb idea??
Not only is Fitz to old he's way to expensive!
Jesus Christ some of you wanting to get rid of Flynn because of money and now suggest getting someone that's MORE money??
Get a grip. Get rid of a back up that's expensive is not the same as bringing someone that would actually pay that's expensive.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Basis4day
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:42 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 15, 2011 11:57 am
Posts: 1313
|
sturg78 wrote: Get rid of a back up that's expensive is not the same as bringing someone that would actually pay that's expensive. Do you realize HOW expensive we're talking for Fitz? 2013: $5 million (+ $10 million option bonus due 3/15), 2014: $12.75 million, 2015: $8 million (+ $8 million roster bonus), 2016: $15 million, 2017-2018: $14.75 million, 2019: Free Agent
_________________
Give me some damn skittles...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fanatics
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 4:47 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 21, 2012 8:21 am
Posts: 32
|
RussWILSON3 wrote: I have seen a few tweets, and some rumblings about Fitz for Flynn .. What do you think??? Possible? If this trade did happen, it would make the off season go by wayyyy to slow. !!!! You need to stop following these people because they obviously no nothing about player values. On top of that, Fitz is the AZ team and his contract which was over 100M, would be hard to fit and would make it impossible to sign some of our own young stars.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:34 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6177
Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
New GM is going to want to make a statement on how he does stuff, I would bet he would do it, Fitz for Flynn, and Carpenter and Moffit, or something like that, they ned a QB and an offensive line.
_________________  To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
warden
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:51 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1427
|
DavidSeven wrote: but truly elite QBs don't need all-world receivers to run a dominant offense. . Hmm Peyton Manning had Harrison/ Wayne Montana had Rice Steve Young had Rice Marino had Duper and Clayton Warner had Bruce and Holt Aikman had Irvin Bradshaw had Swann and Stalworth Just for starters , would you like me to continue
|
|
| |
|
|
|
chris98251
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 5:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:52 pm
Posts: 6177
Location: Renton Wa.
|
|
Montana needed Taylor and Clark and Jones to compliment Rice, but point of your statement is correct, you need guys that can seperate and catch the ball.
Most also had a decent rushing attack, James with Manning, Tyler, Craig, Watters in S.F., Warner Faulk, Bradshaw Blier and some Italian guy named Harris, Smith in Dallas, Marino was the only one that really had no rushing attack, and by chance the only one on that list not to win a Superbowl.
_________________ To Be P/C or Not P/C That is the Question................Seahawks kick Ass !!!! Used to be an Alumni till they pulled a USC on me... .Net official Clueless, Dumbass, Douche, Simpleton, CensoredTard , and Idiot.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:02 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 7029
|
|
We're in LALA land here, but, Fitz would renegotiate to get out.
_________________
@ryanadamdavis
|
|
| |
|
|
|
hawksfan515
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:04 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 6:52 pm
Posts: 5194
Location: Battle Ground, Washington
|
|
Why do people still think that Flynn is actually valuable? Maybe he could net us a conditional 5th in a trade or something, but no more........
|
|
| |
|
|
|
warden
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:05 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 06, 2010 2:31 pm
Posts: 1427
|
chris98251 wrote: Montana needed Taylor and Clark and Jones to compliment Rice, but point of your statement is correct, you need guys that can seperate and catch the ball.
Most also had a decent rushing attack, James with Manning, Tyler, Craig, Watters in S.F., Warner Faulk, Bradshaw Blier and some Italian guy named Harris, Smith in Dallas, Marino was the only one that really had no rushing attack, and by chance the only one on that list not to win a Superbowl. The ultimate team game
|
|
| |
|
|
|
The Battle #83
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 6:35 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 2:42 pm
Posts: 199
Location: Rival Country
|
|
i think you're thinking Fitzpatrick and not fitzgerald
_________________  sig by Ramster
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawkfan509
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:02 pm |
|
| *SILVER SUPPORTER* |
 |
|
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 2:09 pm
Posts: 913
|
SPOHAWK wrote: If my grandma had wheels, she'd be a trolley! You could tape a Cheetah to her back. Just sayin
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawksSoc
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:44 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 30, 2012 10:40 am
Posts: 161
Location: Ireland!
|
Hawkfan509 wrote: SPOHAWK wrote: If my grandma had wheels, she'd be a trolley! You could tape a Cheetah to her back. Just sayin If we take this concept and apply it to football we could be on to something, Niners think Kap is fast? Lets see him outrun an angry Browner strapped to an even angrier cheetah.
_________________
"Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience." - Mark Twain.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hawks46
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 7:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 5:01 pm
Posts: 1753
|
|
No way would I improve the Cardinals to the point of making them the next NFC West Powerhouse !
Oh, and on the whole "QBs needing elite WRs to be successful" point.....
Brady hasn't had an elite WR outside of Moss for one year. They've trotted out tons of journeymen in and out of that system and that QB. Brady made Welker elite, not the other way around. Branch was borderline elite when he was in NE, but he came here and showed he was merely above average. Went back to NE with Brady and bang! he's good again.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
sturg78
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:01 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 9:03 pm
Posts: 903
|
Basis4day wrote:
Do you realize HOW expensive we're talking for Fitz?
2013: $5 million (+ $10 million option bonus due 3/15), 2014: $12.75 million, 2015: $8 million (+ $8 million roster bonus), 2016: $15 million, 2017-2018: $14.75 million, 2019: Free Agent
Dang. That is steep.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:04 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
|
|
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 7029
|
Hawks46 wrote: No way would I improve the Cardinals to the point of making them the next NFC West Powerhouse !
Oh, and on the whole "QBs needing elite WRs to be successful" point.....
Brady hasn't had an elite WR outside of Moss for one year. They've trotted out tons of journeymen in and out of that system and that QB. Brady made Welker elite, not the other way around. Branch was borderline elite when he was in NE, but he came here and showed he was merely above average. Went back to NE with Brady and bang! he's good again. Eli doesn't have squat either. Its laughable how overrated whatever WR he plays with becomes.
_________________
@ryanadamdavis
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hasselbeck
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:32 pm |
|
| * NET Sage * |
 |
|
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm
Posts: 2702
|
|
Flynn for Fitz? I think we'd be giving up too much.. Maybe Flynn for Fitz, Peterson and Dockett.. plus 4 1sts
_________________
Seahawks vs. TBD - Super Bowl 48 - February 2, 2014
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Fitzgerald for Flynn? Posted: Fri Jan 18, 2013 8:43 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am
Posts: 7443
|
pehawk wrote: Hawks46 wrote: No way would I improve the Cardinals to the point of making them the next NFC West Powerhouse !
Oh, and on the whole "QBs needing elite WRs to be successful" point.....
Brady hasn't had an elite WR outside of Moss for one year. They've trotted out tons of journeymen in and out of that system and that QB. Brady made Welker elite, not the other way around. Branch was borderline elite when he was in NE, but he came here and showed he was merely above average. Went back to NE with Brady and bang! he's good again. Eli doesn't have squat either. Its laughable how overrated whatever WR he plays with becomes. You are underselling Nicks and Cruz.
_________________
SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: Barthawk, Cartire, deucediggity, drdiags, Google [Bot], grizbob, gsack1, HawkAroundTheClock, jammerhawk, Lawke, m0ng0, nsport, phpasion, rightbench, Seabean, SeaChase, Seafan, Seahwkgal, Sonichellboy, Sports Hernia, tacomahawk, Tanzania12, Throwdown, tjgamer555, volsunghawk, Zybot and 112 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|
