dunceface wrote:I love Percy Harvin but I really just don't see us doing THAT much in FA this year...
Tru2RedNGold25 wrote:Us as Niners fan have every right to rep Niners all day everyday when we have the hardware to back it up do can u guys say that???
misfit wrote:Harvin is a #1.
Seattle has not had a true #1 WR since Steve Largent.
Rat wrote:How is an explosive offensive weapon a "luxury"? We need playmaking receivers.
Axx wrote:Rat wrote:How is an explosive offensive weapon a "luxury"? We need playmaking receivers.
The Schnei said that he is very excited about WR's in this years draft class so dont expect any free agent players but rookies through the draft.
Axx wrote:Rat wrote:How is an explosive offensive weapon a "luxury"? We need playmaking receivers.
The Schnei said that he is very excited about WR's in this years draft class so dont expect any free agent players but rookies through the draft.
Rat wrote:Axx wrote:Rat wrote:How is an explosive offensive weapon a "luxury"? We need playmaking receivers.
The Schnei said that he is very excited about WR's in this years draft class so dont expect any free agent players but rookies through the draft.
The Schnei says lots of things. You can never tell when these guys are being honest.
Zebulon Dak wrote:Harvin is not that much better than Tate, if at all.
Basis4day wrote:I prefer Tate and Baldwin than Harvin.
ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
mrblitz wrote:at this point, tate is better than harvin.
ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
Hawken-Dazs wrote:Why trade all that for Harvin if he's on the last year of his contract?
misfit wrote:Harvin is a #1.
Seattle has not had a true #1 WR since Steve Largent.
BigMeach wrote:Isnt Garvin a slot receiver? Wouldn't that make Baldwin the poor man's Harvin?
BigMeach wrote:Isnt Garvin a slot receiver? Wouldn't that make Baldwin the poor man's Harvin?
mech.romance wrote:He punched coaches in Florida
Hasselbeck wrote:Basis4day wrote:I prefer Tate and Baldwin than Harvin.
You're kidding me right?
Harvin is 24 and a legit Top 10 WR. This would be a MAJOR coup.
HOWEVER... Harvin wants to get paid, there in lies the issue. Can we afford to give a Percy Harvin a deal he wants, while paying the others?
Happypuppy wrote:Don't forget that the Hawks pass less than 30 times a game. We are ranked near the bottom on pass attempts. Will we really get that much value out of him? Rice needs a solid backup. This the last year was the first in a while he has not missed a lot of time.
Zebulon Dak wrote:But what does he do that Tate doesn't already do for us? Return kicks?
It is currently Tue Apr 24, 2018 11:01 pm
Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]