peachesenregalia wrote:Suarez......God dammit...
Inexcusable. What a twat. He's an amazing footballer, but he's mental.
toadie_uk wrote:In other news... Mike Tyson followed him on Twitter after the incident there's some good dark humour out there
MANUNITED23 wrote:Liverpool is better off selling him, too big of a headache.
MANUNITED23 wrote:Perhaps but does he want to stay, really? I'm not really sure about that. Of course if he gets his head straight then there is no reason to sell him. He is a great player but no player is bigger than a team.
CALIHAWK1 wrote:Its funny how we see things when someone we like or admire does something as opposed to someone we don't like or know.
CALIHAWK1 wrote:Its funny how we see things when someone we like or admire does something as opposed to someone we don't like or know.
Uncle Si wrote:CALIHAWK1 wrote:Its funny how we see things when someone we like or admire does something as opposed to someone we don't like or know.
What does that even mean? Were you in a furor when Defoe bit Macherano a few years back? No, you didn't even know about it.
Plain and simple hypocrisy. Borderline racism. The FA should be ashamed.
Suarez actions were ridiculous. 10 games is shameful
InSuarezWeTrust wrote:Pants on head retarded. I hope he appeals.
Storts wrote:Hahaha, can any of you be complaining about the ten game ban, it's perfectly justified.
Defoe was booked, anyone that knows FA policy realises they cannot retrospectively take action if the referee has already dealt with it
peachesenregalia wrote:Storts wrote:Hahaha, can any of you be complaining about the ten game ban, it's perfectly justified.
Defoe was booked, anyone that knows FA policy realises they cannot retrospectively take action if the referee has already dealt with it
Stop talking shit. The FA was within their power to do something about the Defoe incident and didn't. It's a blatant witch hunt, and the punishment is being dealt to the man and not the crime here.
Storts wrote:peachesenregalia wrote:Storts wrote:Hahaha, can any of you be complaining about the ten game ban, it's perfectly justified.
Defoe was booked, anyone that knows FA policy realises they cannot retrospectively take action if the referee has already dealt with it
Stop talking shit. The FA was within their power to do something about the Defoe incident and didn't. It's a blatant witch hunt, and the punishment is being dealt to the man and not the crime here.
You're the one 'talking shit' as usual when it comes to issues on Suarez. Show me the precedent for the FA charging people if already dealt with by the referee.
You're not even a scouser and you've bought into their everyone's against us mindset. Ten games is perfectly reasonable for someone that has biting previous at their former club plus a serious misdemeanour already whilst in the country. There is no 'witch-hunt' simply one player that has a lot of issues. You telling me what the english Joey Barton did to get a 12 game ban was worse than Suarez?
Storts wrote:That's complete and utter rubbish. Defoe was fouled by Mascherano, and was booked for the aftermath with the ref standing right over the incident. As seen in the video below. Again show me the precedence for the FA undermining our referee's authority.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzXBSvngRR0
Suarez WAS racist. There isn't an accused about it, he was punished accordingly. I agree the Terry decision was a disgrace, think it was a 4 game ban but either way that wasn't enough.
peachesenregalia wrote:Storts wrote:That's complete and utter rubbish. Defoe was fouled by Mascherano, and was booked for the aftermath with the ref standing right over the incident. As seen in the video below. Again show me the precedence for the FA undermining our referee's authority.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JzXBSvngRR0
Suarez WAS racist. There isn't an accused about it, he was punished accordingly. I agree the Terry decision was a disgrace, think it was a 4 game ban but either way that wasn't enough.
Interesting that both Evra and the review board stated that they did not feel that Suarez was a racist.
And back to defoe, if the ref is a representative of the FA, and he flet that a blatant bite on Mascherano was only worth a booking, then why is the same thing from Suarez worth a 10 match ban? Sort yourself out. It's excessive. 5 games would have been more than enough. a 10 game ban is inconsistent and basically says that a bite is worse than calling someone a "black c**t" on live TV.
Storts wrote:Hahaha, can any of you be complaining about the ten game ban, it's perfectly justified.
Defoe was booked, anyone that knows FA policy realises they cannot retrospectively take action if the referee has already dealt with it
InSuarezWeTrust wrote:Excellent decision by Rodgers to rest Suarez today
It is currently Fri Apr 20, 2018 6:55 am