Irvin to OLBer

Happypuppy

New member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
1,975
Reaction score
0
NFL_Football2013":1e29uuif said:
if he could be a better von miller, why not start him out as an LB to begin with?
and really tony cline......thats the best example we can hope for?

Look at DeMarcus Ware and his stats out of college. He is a few pound heavier and a bit shorter and slower. In college he played DE/OLB and during the draft he was listed much like Bruce a tweener. Ware is much stronger ( he is a beast) and moved to the DL I see Bruce as a guy who is better suited perhaps at the OLB.

Last year was not wasted. Learning to play on the line is very valuable and he needed it. Bruce is a guy that plays best in space. I'm jacked about the move even if he is just a part time OLB.
Bruce is now closer to 257-260 BTW not the 240s in college.
 

jlwaters1

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 11, 2010
Messages
2,986
Reaction score
86
NFL_Football2013":etj6rp1p said:
FlyingGreg":etj6rp1p said:
I say, "why not"? The signings of Avril and Bennett gives us the flexibility to do some creative things.

My biggest concern with Irvin at the Sam is teams running the ball right at him.

...this
they ran at him as a DE, if they run at him as an OLB, he wont be able to set the edge and bye bye


He'd have Red Bryant (most likely) in front of him setting the edge, so I'm not sure it's that big of a deal. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
 

Blitzer88

Active member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
12,820
Reaction score
0
Location
Seattle, WA
It will be very interesting to see how he develops as an OLBer. I really hope he exceeds at it as it will allow him to become more versatile thus allowing him to see the field more often.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
jlwaters1":3urmsaz3 said:
NFL_Football2013":3urmsaz3 said:
FlyingGreg":3urmsaz3 said:
I say, "why not"? The signings of Avril and Bennett gives us the flexibility to do some creative things.

My biggest concern with Irvin at the Sam is teams running the ball right at him.

...this
they ran at him as a DE, if they run at him as an OLB, he wont be able to set the edge and bye bye

He'd have Red Bryant (most likely) in front of him setting the edge, so I'm not sure it's that big of a deal. I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

The alignment of linebackers depends on the offensive formation - so if the strong side of the offense is away from Big Red, so will be the Sam.

But I imagine what they envision for Bruce is filling the Sam role in obvious passing downs. It is fun to imagine a pass rush package when we have Clemons, Avril, Bennett (at DT) and Irvin (SAM) on the field at the same time.

I would expect Malcolm Smith -- who is a more traditional LB -- to see the majority of snaps at Sam as he is better against the run.
 

Hawks46

New member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
7,498
Reaction score
0
DavidSeven":1uitkxtm said:
I don't think the move has as much to do with Bruce's strengths and weaknesses as it does our increased depth on defense. Last year, we were thin at DE. This year, we've loaded up with the additions of Avril and Bennett. Bruce has too much unique talent to keep him off the field, so Pete's going to find a way to get these guys looks. Theoretically, with Bruce at OLB, we could have a package that features Clemons, Avril, Bennett and Bruce on the field at the same time. Can you imagine being an opposing QB or O-lineman in that situation? Also, OP's quote points out that he'll still get looks at the DE position in obvious passing situations, so he still retains his role from his rookie season. Looks like we're training him to be an even more versatile weapon on D.


This was my thought on this as well. With Clemons out and Irvin facing suspension, we'll still be looking pretty good for pass rush. When Clemons comes back and Irvin is off of suspension, it would be a struggle to get all of these guys on the DLine at the same time. I don't see Irvin getting much needed experience competing with Avril and Bennett, who are not only more refined pass rushers and run stoppers, but they have more experience.

As for the size thing, I don't buy it. Irvin wasn't that much smaller than Clemons, and he actually has a larger frame. Look at the pictures from the OTA's; Irvin looks about 25-30% bigger than Clem when both are standing together, so he's gained significant weight this offseason.

As for coverage, the word was that Irvin played Safety in High school. If he was half way decent, that should give him the coverage skills he needs to survive at LB.
 

Throwdown

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
24,042
Reaction score
1,325
Location
Tacoma, WA
dontbelikethat":zwi6u7ck said:
My main concern are his coverage skills.

Didn't Irvin play Saftey while he was at Junior College?

I love this move personally.
 

NFL_Football2013

New member
Joined
May 7, 2013
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
Is he going to have like an Aldon Smith rookie year type of role? non starter but situational pass rusher
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,186
Reaction score
4,001
Anyone suggesting this move has nothing to do with Irvin's abilities is kidding themselves. There's a reason we went out and signed several $$ DEs. We're putting him in a position to succeed with his speed. I doubt he'll be starting during TC, Carroll understands he's out for the first 4 games anyways and he has yet to prove anything at OLB.
 

sc85sis

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2010
Messages
8,501
Reaction score
1,353
Location
Houston Suburbs
Makes sense because we used Clay Matthews and Brian Cushing--both linebackers--in the Leo role at USC. It's basically a hybrid role anyway.
 

amill87

New member
Joined
Jan 23, 2011
Messages
1,374
Reaction score
0
Where did the quote come from in the original post? Did Pete ever come out and say Irvin will compete for the starting job at LB? As others have said, the comment about him not being big enough is strange and not something I can imagine Pete saying.

I don't think we will know exactly what's going on with the Irvin/LB thing until training camp and more likely until the season starts and Irvin returns in game 5.

I have a hard time believing that Irvin is going to become a starting outside LB. Obvious passing downs? No doubt that we will see Irvin at LB occasionally. Every other snap of the game? I doubt he is a better LB than Smith and Wright.

I understand that if Irvin plays Sam he will always have Red in front of him (the Leo end plays weak side), so that will help with run defense. I also see the advantage of having pass rush come from the other side in our base defense (base defense all the pressure has been coming from the weak side).

It'll be interesting to see how this plays out and what exactly Pete has planned.
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
The part that caught my attention was the bit about Irvin competing with Smith, not Avril. Smith is a pure WILL LB. If Irvin wins that competition, that means we might see Avril and Irvin on the field as LBs at the same time at some point this season. That would be interesting.

I wonder how well he can cover. He did play safety in high school and briefly at the collegiate level, and he's got the speed (4.50).

Props to Hawkblogger for calling an outright move to LB for Irvin way, way back (I think in January). He sounded sourced at the time, and given his connections to the team and coaches I thought there was a pretty good chance he wasn't full of crap. Turns out he was on the money.
 

NinerBuff

New member
Joined
Apr 3, 2013
Messages
288
Reaction score
0
What's the percentage that you guys run a 'base personal'?

The Niners technically run a 3-4 but we run a 2-4-5 the most (in terms of percent of plays).

I think this whole story is semantics... They'll use Irvin as a rush linebacker, whether there's a 3 or 4 man front. He does have the speed to play in coverage, but it remains to be seen if he has the mental fortitude to diagnose and be an effective OLB in a 4-3.

Like several posters have said, I bet he's a 'pass rush specialist' a la Aldon Smith in his rookie year.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
kearly":4b7kps55 said:
The part that caught my attention was the bit about Irvin competing with Smith, not Avril. Smith is a pure WILL LB. If Irvin wins that competition, that means we might see Avril and Irvin on the field as LBs at the same time at some point this season. That would be interesting.

I wonder how well he can cover. He did play safety in high school and briefly at the collegiate level, and he's got the speed (4.50).

And it's interesting that they moved KJ Wright to Will and Malcom Smith to Sam.

The possibilities and flexibility with this defense (once all hands are on deck) is amazing.
 

McGruff

New member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
5,260
Reaction score
0
Location
Elma, WA
SNDavidson":16mm8kkz said:
A means of having almost all of our pass rushers on the field at the same time.

Clemons and Avril on the edges, Bennett and Hill in the m7ddle, Irvin at OLB, winne on the ege . ? ?
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
T-Sizzle":2gdub2kg said:
DavidSeven":2gdub2kg said:
I don't think the move has as much to do with Bruce's strengths and weaknesses as it does our increased depth on defense. Last year, we were thin at DE. This year, we've loaded up with the additions of Avril and Bennett. Bruce has too much unique talent to keep him off the field, so Pete's going to find a way to get these guys looks. Theoretically, with Bruce at OLB, we could have a package that features Clemons, Avril, Bennett and Bruce on the field at the same time. Can you imagine being an opposing QB or O-lineman in that situation? Also, OP's quote points out that he'll still get looks at the DE position in obvious passing situations, so he still retains his role from his rookie season. Looks like we're training him to be an even more versatile weapon on D.
:13:

I think it's pretty clear that Irvin is being moved because of his strengths and weaknesses.

First, you don't move a 1st round pick to a new position in year two to help fill out the depth chart a little better. If Seattle needed LB help, they had the entire offseason to work that out. It's worth noting too that Seattle did not sign a single LB in free agency, not even for the minimum, and they did not spend a single draft pick on a LB in the draft either, instead opting to wait for UDFA. During the combine, Pete Carroll spoke openly about his comfort and satisfaction with the Seahawks depth chart at LB. Clearly, Pete Carroll feels pretty comfortable about his LB situation.

Second, we are much thinner at DE than we are at LB.

Our LB corps is actually pretty loaded top to bottom, and there will be some starter caliber LBs who won't make the cut for us already. Smith is starter caliber and is stuck on the bench. Bradford showed some really good things in his preseason debut last year (and Pete Carroll noticed it). Morgan is a good linebacker that can play all 3 spots. John Lotulelei was one of the most athletic LBs in the 2013 draft, and I'm very high on fellow UDFA Craig Wilkins, who runs in the 4.50s but is a pain to block. There's also Korey Toomer, who has top shelf physical talent and is a decent bet to make the team during Irvin's suspension as he has good pass rush ability.

At DE, Avril is not really a complete LEO, he's more like Irvin than Clemons- he's a pure edge rusher. He's also got a foot problem. Though Bennett would make an awesome 5-tech, it sounds like he'll see most of his reps inside at 3-tech, similar to Jason Jones. He also has a lingering shoulder problem. Clemons is 32 years old, weighs 265 pounds (listed as less online, but during broadcasts last season he was listed in the 260s), and just tore his ACL in January. That's not a recipe for a quick recovery, most likely. You look at this roster, and they'd be crazy to move Irvin away from DE if he had the same LEO capability as Chris Clemons.

Third, LB really does suit a player like Irvin much better. When given open space, he's a deadly pass rusher, but it's "game over" when a tackle wins the initial arm battle at the line. In college, Irvin compensated for that weakness with a surprisingly strong bull rush, but as is typically the case, his bull rush didn't translate to the NFL. It typically doesn't translate even for most 300 pound DTs, so I'm not surprised it didn't translate for a 245 pound featherweight DE. Getting Irvin in more open space situations where he can exploit speed is exactly the right way to handle him, IMO.
 

FlyingGreg

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
9,515
Reaction score
0
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado
kearly":3duqzwd7 said:
Our LB corps is actually pretty loaded top to bottom, and there will be some starter caliber LBs who won't make the cut for us already. Smith is starter caliber and is stuck on the bench. Bradford showed some really good things in his preseason debut last year (and Pete Carroll noticed it). Morgan is a good linebacker that can play all 3 spots. John Lotulelei was one of the most athletic LBs in the 2013 draft, and I'm very high on fellow UDFA Craig Wilkins, who runs in the 4.50s but is a pain to block. There's also Korey Toomer, who has top shelf physical talent and is a decent bet to make the team during Irvin's suspension as he has good pass rush ability

Kip, don't you see Smith as the most likely starter at Sam?
 

kearly

New member
Joined
Mar 6, 2007
Messages
15,975
Reaction score
0
FlyingGreg":14n1w79s said:
Kip, don't you see Smith as the most likely starter at Sam?

SAM is more of a run stopping position and it typically plays very close to the strong side of the line, so it's almost like a hybrid DE/LB position. For a SAM LBer, it's really important to take blocks well because you have little protection and are asked to take on a lot in the running game.

It's not that I think Smith "can't" play the position, but at 228 pounds with his injury history I think it would be reckless. And also a waste of his talent, as his coverage and blitzing ability fits the WILL spot very well. Mike Morgan is also sub-230, but he'd actually make a pretty good SAM because he plays much bigger than his weight and he stays healthy. Then you have KJ Wright of course, who is an elite run stopper and is as almost as tough to move as a 5-tech. Bradford would be a killer SAM as well. Toomer could play there. Wilkins could too, if they wanted. Of all the LBs I think of as likely to make the team, Smith seems like the very last player I'd peg for the SAM spot.
 

Subzero717

Active member
Joined
Nov 5, 2010
Messages
10,005
Reaction score
14
Location
Is Everything
^So if KJ moved to Will and Irvin is at Sam why is he competing with Malcolm Smith for thst spot instead of Toomer, Morgan or one of the other bigger LBs?

My opinion is we are going to see a bunch of new and different stuff. I also think we will see more 3-4 looks.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,706
Reaction score
10,098
Location
Sammamish, WA
PC and his coaching staff know 50X more than any of us about football. They clearly know what they are doing. If they think it's a good idea, I don't doubt it at all. If it doesn't work out, they'll move him back.
 
Top