The Outer Worlds: Firefly meets Fallout?

The Lounge is for non-sport-related topics other than politics, war and religion. Order up your favorite beverage, kick back and enjoy the conversation! LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
The Outer Worlds: Firefly meets Fallout?
Wed Dec 12, 2018 2:34 pm
  • Heard about this trailer a few days ago, finally saw it.



    Count me in.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Looks like it might be good.
    SeatownJay
    * NET Staff Alumni *
     
    Posts: 10455
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 6:38 pm
    Location: Hagerstown, MD


  • Looks pretty good. Not Cyberpunk 2077 good, but good enough to play.
    MrThortan
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1757
    Joined: Sun Dec 07, 2014 4:57 pm




  • God, I hope this is as good as it looks.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Really curious to see what Starfield is going to look like compared to this. Meh...prolly just have to play both. :lol:
    vin.couve12
    .NET Poster of the Month
     
    Posts: 4893
    Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:19 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


  • vin.couve12 wrote:Really curious to see what Starfield is going to look like compared to this. Meh...prolly just have to play both. :lol:


    Starfield won't be out for another year and a half at least. This comes out in October.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • I've never played a Fallout game, but I'll consider giving this a go as long as it doesn't have that stupid V.A.T.S. shooting mechanic.
    JGfromtheNW
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2089
    Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:37 am
    Location: Wenatchee


  • JGfromtheNW wrote:I've never played a Fallout game, but I'll consider giving this a go as long as it doesn't have that stupid V.A.T.S. shooting mechanic.


    You've never played a Fallout game.

    How can you criticize VATS if you've never played it?

    BTW, VATS is completely optional from Fallout 3 onward. You can absolutely fire from the hip if you want. VATS is just for people who struggle with real-time combat.

    Also, VATS stands for Vault-tec Assisted Targeting System. It's a reference to the company who built the vaults in-game. Bethesda owns Fallout, Obsidian is making The Outer Worlds. So no, VATS will not be in it.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Nope delete it! If mine wasnt allowed this isnt.
    TheObsidianOrder
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 9
    Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:17 pm


  • TheObsidianOrder wrote:Nope delete it! If mine wasnt allowed this isnt.


    :lol:

    7 posts ever, and you're going to dictate to the mods what is and isn't allowed?

    Good luck bud.
    Chapow
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 3117
    Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 5:38 pm


  • Chapow wrote:
    TheObsidianOrder wrote:Nope delete it! If mine wasnt allowed this isnt.


    :lol:

    7 posts ever, and you're going to dictate to the mods what is and isn't allowed?

    Good luck bud.


    Is this about that blatant ad for World of Warships the other day?
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Maulbert wrote:
    JGfromtheNW wrote:I've never played a Fallout game, but I'll consider giving this a go as long as it doesn't have that stupid V.A.T.S. shooting mechanic.


    You've never played a Fallout game.

    How can you criticize VATS if you've never played it?

    BTW, VATS is completely optional from Fallout 3 onward. You can absolutely fire from the hip if you want. VATS is just for people who struggle with real-time combat.

    Also, VATS stands for Vault-tec Assisted Targeting System. It's a reference to the company who built the vaults in-game. Bethesda owns Fallout, Obsidian is making The Outer Worlds. So no, VATS will not be in it.


    I can criticize it because I don't like those types of shooting mechanics in games. I don't think I have to experience it to understand how it works and know I won't like it. It's not like it's a serious critique where I get into the nitty gritty of it either, I'm just not interested in a game with shooting mechanics like it much like I'm not interested in the mechanics of various RTS games, platformers, etc.

    If there are different spots on an enemy that produce a critical hit, I'd rather aim at it in real time and be rewarded for my precision than have the game go into ultra easy mode. Similar to this, I don't like using Dead Eye in RDR2 because it makes it waaaay too easy.

    I also know it's not a Fallout title, but it's by the original creators of Fallout so who knows if they'll implement something similar, even if it's not called VATS.
    JGfromtheNW
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2089
    Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:37 am
    Location: Wenatchee


  • JGfromtheNW wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    JGfromtheNW wrote:I've never played a Fallout game, but I'll consider giving this a go as long as it doesn't have that stupid V.A.T.S. shooting mechanic.


    You've never played a Fallout game.

    How can you criticize VATS if you've never played it?

    BTW, VATS is completely optional from Fallout 3 onward. You can absolutely fire from the hip if you want. VATS is just for people who struggle with real-time combat.

    Also, VATS stands for Vault-tec Assisted Targeting System. It's a reference to the company who built the vaults in-game. Bethesda owns Fallout, Obsidian is making The Outer Worlds. So no, VATS will not be in it.


    I can criticize it because I don't like those types of shooting mechanics in games. I don't think I have to experience it to understand how it works and know I won't like it. It's not like it's a serious critique where I get into the nitty gritty of it either, I'm just not interested in a game with shooting mechanics like it much like I'm not interested in the mechanics of various RTS games, platformers, etc.

    If there are different spots on an enemy that produce a critical hit, I'd rather aim at it in real time and be rewarded for my precision than have the game go into ultra easy mode. Similar to this, I don't like using Dead Eye in RDR2 because it makes it waaaay too easy.

    I also know it's not a Fallout title, but it's by the original creators of Fallout so who knows if they'll implement something similar, even if it's not called VATS.

    It's optional on Fallout just like Red Dead. Early game VATS isn't even accurate and you're better off not using it at that point anyway so you can focus on other skills and what not. I played Inquisition as a live action as well. You actually have a choice and there is no way you can sell that as something wrong.
    vin.couve12
    .NET Poster of the Month
     
    Posts: 4893
    Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 11:19 am
    Location: Vancouver, WA


  • Maulbert wrote:
    Chapow wrote:
    TheObsidianOrder wrote:Nope delete it! If mine wasnt allowed this isnt.


    :lol:

    7 posts ever, and you're going to dictate to the mods what is and isn't allowed?

    Good luck bud.


    Is this about that blatant ad for World of Warships the other day?



    Both advertise the dang game and yet mines free.... So how is mine wrong? I didnt see no damn rules stating against it i checked :).
    TheObsidianOrder
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 9
    Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:17 pm


  • TheObsidianOrder wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    Chapow wrote:
    TheObsidianOrder wrote:Nope delete it! If mine wasnt allowed this isnt.


    :lol:

    7 posts ever, and you're going to dictate to the mods what is and isn't allowed?

    Good luck bud.


    Is this about that blatant ad for World of Warships the other day?



    Both advertise the dang game and yet mines free.... So how is mine wrong? I didnt see no damn rules stating against it i checked :).


    Please check again. There are rules. Your post included a link to an outside vendor, whereas the OP is just a youtube trailer.
    Uncle Si
    * NET Hottie *
     
    Posts: 15299
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 9:34 am


  • TheObsidianOrder wrote:
    Maulbert wrote:
    Chapow wrote:
    TheObsidianOrder wrote:Nope delete it! If mine wasnt allowed this isnt.


    :lol:

    7 posts ever, and you're going to dictate to the mods what is and isn't allowed?

    Good luck bud.


    Is this about that blatant ad for World of Warships the other day?



    Both advertise the dang game and yet mines free.... So how is mine wrong? I didnt see no damn rules stating against it i checked :).


    Please. You posted a link to a game designed to hook people and make them keep paying money, trying to get new victims. I posted two trailers for a game that's not even out yet to discuss it. If you can't see the difference, you're worse than a shill.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries


  • Maulbert, vin.couve12 and Z, thanks for the insight. Sounds like I misunderstood how it affected the later games.
    JGfromtheNW
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2089
    Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:37 am
    Location: Wenatchee


  • JGfromtheNW wrote:Maulbert, vin.couve12 and Z, thanks for the insight. Sounds like I misunderstood how it affected the later games.


    Yeah, you have sights and scopes from 3 on, and can freely aim without VATS. I will also say while I prefer 3 and New Vegas, 4 easily has better combat, and you can mod your weapons with all kinds of sights and scopes you want.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries



  • Bullshit the link is to where you can get rewards just by signing up from the link. Other than that its still just a free game you dont have to spend money on and yet you spend money on other games that do? Either way its advertising a damn game doesnt matter if its free to play or not.
    TheObsidianOrder
    NET Bench Warmer
     
    Posts: 9
    Joined: Fri Nov 04, 2016 2:17 pm


  • TheObsidianOrder wrote:Bullshit the link is to where you can get rewards just by signing up from the link. Other than that its still just a free game you dont have to spend money on and yet you spend money on other games that do? Either way its advertising a damn game doesnt matter if its free to play or not.


    You were trying to get people to play a microtransaction-fueled nightmare.

    I couldn't give 2 shits if anyone else plays The Outer Worlds. I was just discussing it.
    Maulbert
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5288
    Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2014 7:44 pm
    Location: In the basement of Reynholm Industries




It is currently Sat Aug 24, 2019 6:15 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE .NET LOUNGE ]




Information
  • Who is online
  • Users browsing this forum: HawkGA and 27 guests