Saints play at 10am
- Thread starter stang233
- Start date
Shanegotyou11
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 9, 2017
- Messages
- 5,374
- Reaction score
- 382
Bet moved.
Jazzhawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 18, 2009
- Messages
- 10,237
- Reaction score
- 72
Play everyone. We aren't good enough to rest on our laurels.
Hockey Guy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,686
- Reaction score
- 951
Jazzhawk":gvtt9e8l said:
Limited snaps though.
andyh64000
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2013
- Messages
- 983
- Reaction score
- 106
The times will be changed so that Seattle, New Orleans, and Green Bay play at the same time.
Hockey Guy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,686
- Reaction score
- 951
andyh64000":345y6mcp said:
Yeah, most likely.
Reaneypark
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 2,127
- Reaction score
- 23
Hockey Guy":2n523twy said:
Yup, NFL likes to do that and for good reason, I guess.
Hockey Guy
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2017
- Messages
- 1,686
- Reaction score
- 951
andyh64000":gx26fky2 said:
Spot on, just announced:
https://www.msn.com/en-ca/sports/nfl/nf ... li=AAggNb9
All 3 play in the 4:25EST time slot with WFT playing Philly in the Sunday nighter.
I don't see this as a good time to "rest" anybody. 49ers will come to play, we should, too. If we get up on them like we did against the Jets, sure...do it. But I don't see Pete letting up at all this week.
We've clinched the #3 seed, but the #2 seed is still a good possibility and the #1 may be a long shot, but it's still there and I don't see a letup.
I suspect the new playoff setup was enacted to increase motivation in game 16s around the league.
We've clinched the #3 seed, but the #2 seed is still a good possibility and the #1 may be a long shot, but it's still there and I don't see a letup.
I suspect the new playoff setup was enacted to increase motivation in game 16s around the league.
You. Play. To. Win. The. Game. To quote Herm Edwards. To wit, we simply don't know yet what will happen. Who would have guessed that the Rams would have laid an egg against the Jets just a couple of weeks after we thoroughly waxed the stadium with them?
Spin Doctor
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,249
- Reaction score
- 2,206
I want us to go with a pass heavy game plan to get Russ back in the groove.
Bigpumpkin
Active member
Spin Doctor":2iolmc86 said:
Would a 60/40 split make you happy?
RiverDog
Well-known member
It's been a long season and a lot of our guys aren't completely healthy. They can use a day off. In addition, the Niners have nothing to play for and a lot of them are playing for their jobs, not giving a rip if their team gets penalized for a personal foul. I'm not sure if I want to put Russell back there on the firing line in a meaningless game amongst a bunch of head hunters.
Just something to think about.
Just something to think about.
Spin Doctor
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 8, 2009
- Messages
- 5,249
- Reaction score
- 2,206
I think a lot of Russ and Penny would be beneficial, get them some confidence back.Bigpumpkin":3pu3gzfe said:
RiverDog":nfqcy6rw said:
I think there is something to be said about resting the players so they can get healthy going into the playoffs but I kind of agree with Sutz (go NAVY), don't want to give up an inch of momentum Plus I think SF would LOVE to derail the Hawks here so I'm not thinking they have nothing to play for... they play for pride... Not Like Sherman is going to give up he doesn't know how to give up...
Just my take
LTH
SantaClaraHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 15,007
- Reaction score
- 3,088
Here's the official depth chart:
https://www.seahawks.com/team/depth-chart
We won't know anything about whether our opponent or the aforementioned teams are doing before we ourselves have to turn in our inactives--and the only place I see to realistically do that is with two, maybe three people who are not being played in the rotation.
The biggest exemption I could see is maybe Snacks being put in as an active No. 3...but they've already removed him from the roster.
https://www.seahawks.com/team/depth-chart
We won't know anything about whether our opponent or the aforementioned teams are doing before we ourselves have to turn in our inactives--and the only place I see to realistically do that is with two, maybe three people who are not being played in the rotation.
The biggest exemption I could see is maybe Snacks being put in as an active No. 3...but they've already removed him from the roster.
[tweet]https://twitter.com/Mitch_Seattle/status/1343734117637136385[/tweet]
SantaClaraHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2015
- Messages
- 15,007
- Reaction score
- 3,088
KitsapGuy":128utdmo said:
Ah, I see even the Rams didn't go for Haskins as a body.
Point is...there aren't all that many guys that can serve as healthy inactives.
