Seahawks have an outside chance for the #1 Seed

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
19,009
Reaction score
7,794
Location
Sultan, WA
Am I in the minority here? I find this scenario to hardly be a stretch.

No, no, I have no disillusionment over assuming the way most think it's going to turn out is precisely how it turns out. If I am in Vegas, the cards are heavily stacked against me. Yet, when diving deep, I start to see that this isn't as uncredulous as it first appears.

Look at the Bears last month. Are they not trending upwards to a surprising degree? Even Mitch has lifted some eyebrows as of late. Is it all that crazy to think that the Bears couldn't take this game from the Packers? Especially that they just lost their tackle Bakhtiari for the season? That's like us losing Brown this week.

And the Saints? In Carolina. They only lost by 3 to the Saints in the first matchup. Watch them and you can clearly see they are no push overs. While they may need another year or two, this team is built to upset a playoff team RIGHT NOW.

So outside chance for the Hawks to grab that #1 seed? Sure, I would agree with that.

But don't be at all surprised if it happens Sunday.
 

bmorepunk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
2,990
Reaction score
201
Aros":38crstpi said:
Am I in the minority here? I find this scenario to hardly be a stretch.

No, no, I have no disillusionment over assuming the way most think it's going to turn out is precisely how it turns out. If I am in Vegas, the cards are heavily stacked against me. Yet, when diving deep, I start to see that this isn't as uncredulous as it first appears.

Look at the Bears last month. Are they not trending upwards to a surprising degree? Even Mitch has lifted some eyebrows as of late. Is it all that crazy to think that the Bears couldn't take this game from the Packers? Especially that they just lost their tackle Bakhtiari for the season? That's like us losing Brown this week.

And the Saints? In Carolina. They only lost by 3 to the Saints in the first matchup. Watch them and you can clearly see they are no push overs. While they may need another year or two, this team is built to upset a playoff team RIGHT NOW.

So outside chance for the Hawks to grab that #1 seed? Sure, I would agree with that.

But don't be at all surprised if it happens Sunday.

The Bears have lost nine of the last 10 games against the Packers. They've lost 21 of 26 during the Aaron Rodgers era.

The Saints have won eight of the last ten meetings against the Panthers.

The Bears winning would be an upset. The Panthers winning would be a really big upset. The Seahawks still have to win their game.

The correct thing to do is to play for it here, but mathematically it's a pretty low (single digit %) probability of working out. But so is the probability of the Seahawks winning the Super Bowl. You just play for it and see what happens.
 

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,535
Location
Arizona
bmorepunk":ldzyz7up said:
The Bears have lost nine of the last 10 games against the Packers. They've lost 21 of 26 during the Aaron Rodgers era.

The Saints have won eight of the last ten meetings against the Panthers.

OK. Let's assume the Packers have a 80% (21/26) chance of winning and Saints have an 80% (8/10) chance of winning.

Using those percentages, if the Seahawks win they have a 64% chance at the #3 seed, a 32% chance at the #2 seed, and a 4% chance at the #1 seed.

I believe that odds are more like Packers 60% / Saints 70%. Which means a Seahawks win gives them a 42% chance at the #3 seed, a 46% chance at the #2 seed, and a 12% chance at the #1 seed.

Football Outsiders has it at #1 - 6.9%, #2 - 18.7%, #3 - 65.2%.

Whatever the real odds are, anything can happen. Getting the #2 seed also means a decent chance of homefield throughout. The 49ers game is probably much more important than it appears.
 

TraderGary

Active member
Joined
May 25, 2020
Messages
372
Reaction score
101
In my mind, a Chicago win over GB would not surprise me. The Bears are playing for their playoff lives. This is essentially a playoff game for them. But Carolina beating the Saints, even without Kamara, would be a very big surprise. Obviously the Panthers have nothing to play for at this point, and the players are already thinking about where they're going to go on vacation in the offseason.

As much as I would love to see this play out in our favor, it's highly unlikely. That being said, I'll definitely be scoreboard watching as I'm watching the Hawks game on Sunday, and hoping for a miracle.
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,178
Reaction score
1,782
They have a puncher's chance against N.O. who won't have Kamara and several others. They won a tough game last weekend against WFT and only lost in the first contest by 3. As well several of the players on the Panthers are playing for jobs next season and if they fail to show up that may seal their NFL careers.

For the as well Teddy B is playing against the team he practiced against last season. I predict a close game.

If nothing else I'd like the Hawks to leap frog over GB so the game between the team would be in our house (I'm a 12). That said for the team there Are advantages available to play for tomorrow and a W may help greatly later in the playoffs.
 

Elemas

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
7
I'd rest them. Both teams losing would be a huge surprise.
I don't think the odds make sense for us to be all in.

Is it worth the injury risk?
 

renofox

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,218
Reaction score
3,535
Location
Arizona
Elemas":2zbfldnc said:
I'd rest them. Both teams losing would be a huge surprise.
I don't think the odds make sense for us to be all in.

Is it worth the injury risk?

If Seahawks win and only 1 of GB/NO loses, Seahawks get the 2 seed - likely Divisional playoff game at home instead of on the road.
 

Elemas

New member
Joined
Jan 1, 2018
Messages
1,369
Reaction score
7
renofox":1u9p50mt said:
Elemas":1u9p50mt said:
I'd rest them. Both teams losing would be a huge surprise.
I don't think the odds make sense for us to be all in.

Is it worth the injury risk?

If Seahawks win and only 1 of GB/NO loses, Seahawks get the 2 seed - likely Divisional playoff game at home instead of on the road.

Thanks for the correction. Not sure why I was only focused on both losing.

In that case, all in.
 

LTH

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 1, 2009
Messages
4,326
Reaction score
1,012
Aros":3ttuw0f4 said:
Am I in the minority here? I find this scenario to hardly be a stretch.

No, no, I have no disillusionment over assuming the way most think it's going to turn out is precisely how it turns out. If I am in Vegas, the cards are heavily stacked against me. Yet, when diving deep, I start to see that this isn't as uncredulous as it first appears.

Look at the Bears last month. Are they not trending upwards to a surprising degree? Even Mitch has lifted some eyebrows as of late. Is it all that crazy to think that the Bears couldn't take this game from the Packers? Especially that they just lost their tackle Bakhtiari for the season? That's like us losing Brown this week.

And the Saints? In Carolina. They only lost by 3 to the Saints in the first matchup. Watch them and you can clearly see they are no push overs. While they may need another year or two, this team is built to upset a playoff team RIGHT NOW.

So outside chance for the Hawks to grab that #1 seed? Sure, I would agree with that.

But don't be at all surprised if it happens Sunday.


My goodness... you have me convinced... Holy moley man!! to bad the wife took my check book... dang!! LOL


LTH :D
 

eo620

Active member
Joined
May 7, 2020
Messages
134
Reaction score
95
I'm guessing we'll get one out of two. Either the packers or saints lose. Definitely not both. Seahawks still need to win their game. Get the #2 seed and stay at home as long as we can.
 

AROS

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Feb 23, 2007
Messages
19,009
Reaction score
7,794
Location
Sultan, WA
LTH":215q2exi said:
My goodness... you have me convinced... Holy moley man!! to bad the wife took my check book... dang!! LOL

Well someone's gotta rally the troops! :lol:
 

Polaris

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
2,206
Reaction score
0
Just 'ballparking' it, I estimate we have about a 5% chance for the #1 seed, a 20% chance for the #2 seed, and a 75% chance we are the #3 seed. That said, anyone that has played DND knows that natural 20s (5% chance) do happen.
 

stack55

Active member
Joined
May 4, 2013
Messages
344
Reaction score
97
Wow, it will be 1and done if they play like we’re playing now against the 49ers.
 

RolandDeschain

Well-known member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
33,119
Reaction score
949
Location
Kissimmee, FL
All due credit to the Niners, their defense is too banged up for our offense to be playing like this against them.
 

Polaris

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
2,206
Reaction score
0
stack55":2zyccogu said:
Wow, it will be 1and done if they play like we’re playing now against the 49ers.

The niners are better than their record and having Seattle lay a last game egg is not new. I am confident we will play a lot better next week. We are going to be the #3 seed no matter what. Neither the packers nor the saints are going to lose.
 
Top