PFF: Brooks > Queen

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,410
Reaction score
9,860
Location
Sammamish, WA
They like their guy, we like ours. At some point, it's time to move on from dwelling on the Queen thing.
 

sdog1981

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
3,367
Reaction score
240
I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.
 

Hockey Guy

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 26, 2017
Messages
1,674
Reaction score
924
sdog1981":tix4yqss said:
I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

WTF?

You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

JFC, this place.
 

BChawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
1,343
Reaction score
171
Hockey Guy":20kntbfq said:
sdog1981":20kntbfq said:
I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

WTF?


You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

JFC, this place.

I especially liked when he paired up with Ronnie Dunn
 

evergreen

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 6, 2013
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
446
Erick Johnson used to tell us Queen 2>Abbey Road...
 

Nothinbutm

Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2010
Messages
669
Reaction score
23
Location
El Paso, TX
Hockey Guy":1rwxigy6 said:
sdog1981":1rwxigy6 said:
I don't know man, Queen has over 300 million in total album sales and has an almost 50-year headstart over Brooks. I also have never heard any of Brooks's music.

WTF?

You've never heard of Garth Brooks?

JFC, this place.

No. Because he has taste.
 

Chapow

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 11, 2010
Messages
5,292
Reaction score
1,175
Rat":3vyd2r7d said:
That article rates both of them poorly.

That's one way to look at it. But even if you choose to look at it that way, surely you noticed that it rated Queen significantly more poorly than Brooks.

Brooks PFF Rating, 49. This isn't good, but it's not terrible either. More mediocre than anything.

Queen PFF Rating, 29.8. This is just straight up bad. They also noted in the article that Queen led the league in missed tackles.

It's pretty clear that so far Brooks has been the better player.
 

HawkStrong

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 12, 2019
Messages
1,278
Reaction score
461
Location
In your PMs
Chapow":1ymnp9yh said:
Rat":1ymnp9yh said:
That article rates both of them poorly.

That's one way to look at it. But even if you choose to look at it that way, surely you noticed that it rated Queen significantly more poorly than Brooks.

Brooks PFF Rating, 49. This isn't good, but it's not terrible either. More mediocre than anything.

Queen PFF Rating, 29.8. This is just straight up bad. They also noted in the article that Queen led the league in missed tackles.

It's pretty clear that so far Brooks has been the better player.

Brooks get marked down quite a bit due to his coverage grade.
 

LickMyNuts

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 29, 2013
Messages
987
Reaction score
367
Linebacker isn’t a quick break in in the NFL. The jump from college to nfl at that position is huge. Well have a better read on Brooks next season.
 
Top