John Clayton talking smack about Seahawks

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
8,731
Reaction score
2,506
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
All he said was "the Seahawks weren't involved" in the NFC West signings today. That's some weak smack talk.
 

knownone

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 7, 2010
Messages
5,280
Reaction score
2,220
Rat":12lrdzif said:
All he said was "the Seahawks weren't involved" in the NFC West signings today. That's some weak smack talk.
This.

The article even provides a rationale overview of what the front office is doing.
 

Jville

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
13,248
Reaction score
1,617
The tread title clearly miss characterizes John Clayton's thoughts on events in the NFC West today.

It's a faithful update on the NFL West.
 

Thepeelsessions

New member
Joined
Oct 4, 2009
Messages
1,848
Reaction score
0
Location
Out here
I like Clayton and all, but he can never get a guys name right. He either mis-pronounces it or gets the name wrong. "Marcus Hudson".
 

TreeRon

Active member
Joined
Nov 5, 2017
Messages
1,612
Reaction score
9
He did say John Clayton smack so that's as "smack" as JC would get.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,594
Reaction score
1,607
Location
Roy Wa.
Best thing there.

Christopher Crawford
@Crawford_MILB
·
Mar 16
I see the Bears made a strong run at Russell Wilson, and I'd just like to congratulate the Seahawks for adequately protecting Wilson for the first time.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
29,707
Reaction score
10,122
Location
Sammamish, WA
I listen to 710 every day, no, he didn't "talk smack"
Are people really this sensitive? The blowhard that is Paul Gallant, now THAT is a guy who blasts Russ and front office on a daily basis. He's worse than Tom Twattsell
 
Top