Sinking Ship

sprhawk73

Active member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
492
Reaction score
112
Would any decent coach want PC’s job at this point? How do you right a ship that is sinking with no draft picks and very little to work with? Job security? One way to secure your position is by making the position unattractive. Sabotage

Was there this much site activity when we were winning?
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,866
Reaction score
9,674
Location
Delaware
I'm sure quite a few would love that job. The Seahawks are a stable, model organization. This isn't friggin Jacksonville.

And I'd have to disagree that making the position "unattractive" is a means of self-preservation for any coach or executive. Quite the opposite, in fact. If a team fires a coach, it's because the situation has devolved significantly to the point where ownership no longer feels that they can win with the current staff. Making the role unattractive does nothing to secure one's seat.

Also, there was more site activity in past winning years. Forums weren't as outmoded as they are today.
 

massari

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
318
They've a top QB when healthy, so of course coaches would love it in Seattle, especially offensive minded ones.

The Hawks can trade DK for a couple high picks before his big cap hit, then look to fill some holes on OL and DL with them. Lot's of good free agent WRs to sign should they trade Metcalf.

Invest heavily in free agency and draft upgrading the DL and OL, they're a top team again.
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,594
Reaction score
1,607
Location
Roy Wa.
massari":2b09fjkp said:
They've a top QB when healthy, so of course coaches would love it in Seattle, especially offensive minded ones.

The Hawks can trade DK for a couple high picks before his big cap hit, then look to fill some holes on OL and DL with them. Lot's of good free agent WRs to sign should they trade Metcalf.

Invest heavily in free agency and draft upgrading the DL and OL, they're a top team again.

So Fantasy Football.
 

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,237
Reaction score
2,165
Maelstrom787":dhgre0lo said:
I'm sure quite a few would love that job. The Seahawks are a stable, model organization. This isn't friggin Jacksonville.

And I'd have to disagree that making the position "unattractive" is a means of self-preservation for any coach or executive. Quite the opposite, in fact. If a team fires a coach, it's because the situation has devolved significantly to the point where ownership no longer feels that they can win with the current staff. Making the role unattractive does nothing to secure one's seat.

Also, there was more site activity in past winning years. Forums weren't as outmoded as they are today.
Just curious, what makes the Seahawks a "model organization"? That may have been true underneath Paul Allen, but his successor, Jody Allen is largely an unknown quantity. There are a lot of questions about the ownership and management of this team at the moment.
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,866
Reaction score
9,674
Location
Delaware
Spin Doctor":35anqdo5 said:
Maelstrom787":35anqdo5 said:
I'm sure quite a few would love that job. The Seahawks are a stable, model organization. This isn't friggin Jacksonville.

And I'd have to disagree that making the position "unattractive" is a means of self-preservation for any coach or executive. Quite the opposite, in fact. If a team fires a coach, it's because the situation has devolved significantly to the point where ownership no longer feels that they can win with the current staff. Making the role unattractive does nothing to secure one's seat.

Also, there was more site activity in past winning years. Forums weren't as outmoded as they are today.
Just curious, what makes the Seahawks a "model organization"? That may have been true underneath Paul Allen, but his successor, Jody Allen is largely an unknown quantity. There are a lot of questions about the ownership and management of this team at the moment.

The owner is technically Paul Allen's Trust, which Jody is the trustee of. There are other executives, like Schneider, who is highly respected.

Other than that, Seattle for the past long while has had pretty stable leaders, and tends to be an examplary franchise with the overall results on the field following suit. A lot of that is owed to Pete.

Good example is how Seattle has, by far, had the best response to the pandemic out of all the franchises and, by extension, almost no on-field problems caused by the virus.

Anyone coming in is stepping into an organization that was built by competent hands. A structure is already in place. Just coach, baby.
 

xray

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
9,523
Reaction score
1,584
Location
AZ
Spin Doctor":39uywshz said:
Maelstrom787":39uywshz said:
I'm sure quite a few would love that job. The Seahawks are a stable, model organization. This isn't friggin Jacksonville.

And I'd have to disagree that making the position "unattractive" is a means of self-preservation for any coach or executive. Quite the opposite, in fact. If a team fires a coach, it's because the situation has devolved significantly to the point where ownership no longer feels that they can win with the current staff. Making the role unattractive does nothing to secure one's seat.

Also, there was more site activity in past winning years. Forums weren't as outmoded as they are today.
Just curious, what makes the Seahawks a "model organization"? That may have been true underneath Paul Allen, but his successor, Jody Allen is largely an unknown quantity. There are a lot of questions about the ownership and management of this team at the moment.

^
The silence from ownership is deafening .
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,866
Reaction score
9,674
Location
Delaware
xray":vu3y05ue said:
Spin Doctor":vu3y05ue said:
Maelstrom787":vu3y05ue said:
I'm sure quite a few would love that job. The Seahawks are a stable, model organization. This isn't friggin Jacksonville.

And I'd have to disagree that making the position "unattractive" is a means of self-preservation for any coach or executive. Quite the opposite, in fact. If a team fires a coach, it's because the situation has devolved significantly to the point where ownership no longer feels that they can win with the current staff. Making the role unattractive does nothing to secure one's seat.

Also, there was more site activity in past winning years. Forums weren't as outmoded as they are today.
Just curious, what makes the Seahawks a "model organization"? That may have been true underneath Paul Allen, but his successor, Jody Allen is largely an unknown quantity. There are a lot of questions about the ownership and management of this team at the moment.

^
The silence from ownership is deafening .

To a pissed off fan who wants to see heads roll, sure. I can see how one might think that.

But if you think coaches want ownership sticking their beaks into shit and not letting the football people handle the football jobs, you're on something. The thread was about the job being unattractive to other suitors. What you're hoping for is something that will actively make Seattle a less desirable organization.
 

kf3339

Active member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
3,708
Reaction score
10
massari":2ycx10i6 said:
They've a top QB when healthy, so of course coaches would love it in Seattle, especially offensive minded ones.

The Hawks can trade DK for a couple high picks before his big cap hit, then look to fill some holes on OL and DL with them. Lot's of good free agent WRs to sign should they trade Metcalf.

Invest heavily in free agency and draft upgrading the DL and OL, they're a top team again.

Investing heavily in the lines is a great idea! The problem is that leadership pretty much has done the exact opposite for years. That's why we have such weak lines that get pushed around by every team we play.

That's not changing with our "leadership".
 

massari

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,477
Reaction score
318
chris98251":281n983g said:
massari":281n983g said:
They've a top QB when healthy, so of course coaches would love it in Seattle, especially offensive minded ones.

The Hawks can trade DK for a couple high picks before his big cap hit, then look to fill some holes on OL and DL with them. Lot's of good free agent WRs to sign should they trade Metcalf.

Invest heavily in free agency and draft upgrading the DL and OL, they're a top team again.

So Fantasy Football.
Yes, trading Frank Clark away in the same type of situation was all just a fantasy.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
There are only 32 NFL coaching positions, it's one of the most highly compensated and prestigious job a football coach will ever attain, that includes even the worst of jobs in places like NY, Detroit, etc.

So of course the Hawks could still attract just about any available coach they want.

It's certainly not in the top 2-3 of organizations like it was 7-8 years ago, but still a great organization, great city and great fan base, and I assume the same deep pockets to pay whatever it takes to get the best candidate.
 

John63

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 19, 2018
Messages
6,651
Reaction score
149
Most good coaches look for certain things when they take a job

draft capitol
Franchise QB
Young Talent
Power
Ownership
Facilities

Seattle at the moment has 3 of those. Some young talent, great facilities, and a franchise QB

We don't have draft capital
whoever would take the HC job will not have the same power PC has
Ownership is a huge question mark.

so decide what you think, I think there are some good HC who would be interested but a lot that will not.
 

xray

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 19, 2018
Messages
9,523
Reaction score
1,584
Location
AZ
sprhawk73":13qgl7zv said:
Would any decent coach want PC’s job at this point? How do you right a ship that is sinking with no draft picks and very little to work with? Job security? One way to secure your position is by making the position unattractive. Sabotage

Was there this much site activity when we were winning?

Any decent coach would be thrilled to hire on , knowing that ownership would hand over the keys to the castle and complete control , like they did with Carroll . Who wouldn't ?
 
OP
OP
sprhawk73

sprhawk73

Active member
Joined
Sep 7, 2017
Messages
492
Reaction score
112
John63":1il372rx said:
Most good coaches look for certain things when they take a job

draft capitol
Franchise QB
Young Talent
Power
Ownership
Facilities

Seattle at the moment has 3 of those. Some young talent, great facilities, and a franchise QB

We don't have draft capital
whoever would take the HC job will not have the same power PC has
Ownership is a huge question mark.

so decide what you think, I think there are some good HC who would be interested but a lot that will not.

Precisely, if we blow it up now don't expect anybody that good as a replacement.

I wonder if Mora is available. :sarcasm_on:
 

chris98251

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 27, 2007
Messages
39,594
Reaction score
1,607
Location
Roy Wa.
John63":yhyap3j8 said:
Most good coaches look for certain things when they take a job

draft capitol
Franchise QB
Young Talent
Power
Ownership
Facilities

Seattle at the moment has 3 of those. Some young talent, great facilities, and a franchise QB

We don't have draft capital
whoever would take the HC job will not have the same power PC has
Ownership is a huge question mark.

so decide what you think, I think there are some good HC who would be interested but a lot that will not.

So now you have a NFL coach as a buddy also.............

He told you these things right, most Teams hire a coach when something goes wrong, they have a lack of talent, no QB, no assets in the draft to build with initially, many teams have a GM and are reluctant to give complete control due to hey what we have here, ours works better then most in the past however but you can get tunnel vision with one person having all the say.

Our ownership is ideal for a good Coach GM team since we don't have a meddlesome owner.

Facilities will always be top notch with this ownership as well.
 

jeremiah

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
763
Reaction score
257
Spin Doctor":1thych4t said:
Maelstrom787":1thych4t said:
I'm sure quite a few would love that job. The Seahawks are a stable, model organization. This isn't friggin Jacksonville.

And I'd have to disagree that making the position "unattractive" is a means of self-preservation for any coach or executive. Quite the opposite, in fact. If a team fires a coach, it's because the situation has devolved significantly to the point where ownership no longer feels that they can win with the current staff. Making the role unattractive does nothing to secure one's seat.

Also, there was more site activity in past winning years. Forums weren't as outmoded as they are today.
Just curious, what makes the Seahawks a "model organization"? That may have been true underneath Paul Allen, but his successor, Jody Allen is largely an unknown quantity. There are a lot of questions about the ownership and management of this team at the moment.

Look up how Jody ran the organization in Portland. She is not a serious football mind or businessman. Look to her to cash in on a big sale soon.
 
Top