Poll: What is Russ's trade value this offseason?

How much draft capital will teams give up to trade for Russ?

  • Less than 2 first round picks

    Votes: 23 33.8%
  • 2 first round picks

    Votes: 15 22.1%
  • 2 first round picks and more picks

    Votes: 17 25.0%
  • 3 first round picks

    Votes: 5 7.4%
  • 3 first round picks and more picks

    Votes: 3 4.4%
  • More than 3 first round picks/more picks

    Votes: 2 2.9%
  • Other

    Votes: 3 4.4%

  • Total voters
    68

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
4,486
Reaction score
1,298
IF Russ is traded this offseason what will teams be willing to give up for him?

Remember he's a:

SB winning QB
All-time competitor
Winner
33 years old
Coming off of injury
Not playing great ball recently

The poll should go on the assumption that he continues his lackluster play the rest of the year as he has been not good since his injury (and even before at times this year). Yes it certainly depends on where teams are at this point positioned to pick in the 22 draft but hard to look at every option.
 

BamKam

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
643
Reaction score
292
It really depends if there is a team that is desperate for a QB because they have a lot of young talent and have a 2-3 year window to win. I think he will still be worth at least a 1st round even after this season if that is the case.
 

nwHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
3,836
Reaction score
1,253
2 - 1st and possibly more to the right team. He still has value to a franchise.
 

iigakusei

New member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,856
Reaction score
1
We are going to trade Wilson for less than Jamal Adams. Absolute joke.
 

Grahamhawker

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 21, 2012
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
378
Location
Graham, WA
iigakusei":1i153b8x said:
We are going to trade Wilson for less than Jamal Adams. Absolute joke.

Well, now that Obrien's out in Houston, who else are you going to get to bite on those kind of deals?

Says more about how much we overpaid for Adams than RW's value, imho.
 

hoxrox

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 5, 2009
Messages
3,299
Reaction score
1,972
This past offseason: 3 first round picks and maybe more

Currently: 2 first round picks and maybe more

If his play continues to deteriorate in the next 6 games: a bag of peanuts
 

Maelstrom787

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 28, 2011
Messages
11,860
Reaction score
9,647
Location
Delaware
Less than 2 first rounders is crackheadery. A broken Wentz just went for a first, and a team was about to pull the trigger on Watson for value of over 3 firsts.

I think you can get three firsts for him from a sad team solely based on resume. Its a quarterback league.
 

Sgt. Largent

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2012
Messages
25,560
Reaction score
7,611
Even if Russell continues to not play well the rest of the season, there should be plenty of desperate teams willing to trade AT LEAST two first rounders, if not three....or some player/ pick package for Russell.

As long as he doesn't sustain another serious injury that'd cause teams to pause on trading for him, his trade value will remain high.
 

HawkOG70’

Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2019
Messages
542
Reaction score
0
The knee jerk reaction is to say less than 2 first round picks however this is where John Schneider can shine like he did with the Frank Clark trade. If it nets us another guy like Taylor I'd consider it a win in and of itself
 

ZagHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
2,153
Reaction score
176
His trade value has definitely dropped. That being said since coming back one could actually say he is showing improvement through each game. So if he does play out the remainder of the season and continues to improve on what he is currently to look somewhat like what he used to be, his trade value will return.

Things that do hurt his trade value, his massive contract, its highly dependent on how he looks the remainder of this season (if he doesn't get benched), the fact that he already wants out and has a limited set of teams he's willing to play for (If I'm a GM trying to get RW, I know he wants out, and I know I only need to battle 4 teams vs 20 teams for him...I can offer much much less).
 

jammerhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2007
Messages
10,175
Reaction score
1,778
until he can show he still has the "it" his value iOS decreasing.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,583
Reaction score
6,735
Location
SoCal Desert
One thing for sure, Russ's trade value will be low this off season than last off season. Very reason why I advocated in trading him at that time to get maximum return. It's a matter of how much lower, we just have to figure out a way to protect his trade value at this point, sitting him based on injury could be a good start.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
5,669
Reaction score
1,707
If I was an NFL GM evaluating whether to trade for Russell, right now I would be looking at his huge drop-off in play and in W/L results (2-6 W-L this year), and would consider it a very risky option. It's hard to tell which factor is leading to Russell getting crap for results. Is it because...

* The talent around him is crap
* Is the new Waldron scheme (thus far) crap, and/or not a fit for Wilson?
* Has Russell has lost that "it" factor due to
a) aging/loss of athletic ability
b) Loss of focus & desire, or
c) the league-wide "book" on how to play Russell has neutralized his strengths such that he'll never be a top QB again unless he makes massive adjustments, or
d) Some combination of, or all of, the above.

As a GM, for sure, I'd have to have my coaches and coordinators explain exactly why Russell sucking isn't his fault, and exactly why things would be different in our scheme and with our talent. Then I'd look at our cap situation and figure out how many talented players we'd have to get rid of (preferably trades for younger, cheaper players with upside) to fit Russell's contract under the cap.

I'd also only be interested if my team already had a good defense, and a solid running game. Russell did have one year (2015) where his passing carried the team, but last season's "Let Russ Cook" disaster suggests that I shouldn't plan on 2015-like offensive fireworks. If my team had some up-and-coming QB talent on a rookie contract, I'd pass.

After considering the cap issues, offensive coaches input, and whether solid "game manager" QB talent was already on the team... if the resulting scenario was any less than "Division Champs and legit SB contender", I'd pass on trading for Russell, almost regardless of price.

The Indy trade for Carson Wentz is roughly comparable, except that Wentz is quite a bit younger than Russell. The trade of Alex Smith from KC to Washington is also another potential comparable.

We might be lucky to get a single 1st for Russell at this point.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,583
Reaction score
6,735
Location
SoCal Desert
olyfan63":2rynwsij said:
If I was an NFL GM evaluating whether to trade for Russell, right now I would be looking at his huge drop-off in play and in W/L results (2-6 W-L this year), and would consider it a very risky option. It's hard to tell which factor is leading to Russell getting crap for results. Is it because...

* The talent around him is crap
* Is the new Waldron scheme (thus far) crap, and/or not a fit for Wilson?
* Has Russell has lost that "it" factor due to
a) aging/loss of athletic ability
b) Loss of focus & desire, or
c) the league-wide "book" on how to play Russell has neutralized his strengths such that he'll never be a top QB again unless he makes massive adjustments, or
d) Some combination of, or all of, the above.

As a GM, for sure, I'd have to have my coaches and coordinators explain exactly why Russell sucking isn't his fault, and exactly why things would be different in our scheme and with our talent. Then I'd look at our cap situation and figure out how many talented players we'd have to get rid of (preferably trades for younger, cheaper players with upside) to fit Russell's contract under the cap.

I'd also only be interested if my team already had a good defense, and a solid running game. Russell did have one year (2015) where his passing carried the team, but last season's "Let Russ Cook" disaster suggests that I shouldn't plan on 2015-like offensive fireworks. If my team had some up-and-coming QB talent on a rookie contract, I'd pass.

After considering the cap issues, offensive coaches input, and whether solid "game manager" QB talent was already on the team... if the resulting scenario was any less than "Division Champs and legit SB contender", I'd pass on trading for Russell, almost regardless of price.

The Indy trade for Carson Wentz is roughly comparable, except that Wentz is quite a bit younger than Russell. The trade of Alex Smith from KC to Washington is also another potential comparable.

We might be lucky to get a single 1st for Russell at this point.

Not trading Russ last off season ought to be reason enough to fire Pete and John. These two were behaving like fans, like Russ's homers than cold hearted professionals. Shame on them.
 

AgentDib

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 1, 2010
Messages
5,470
Reaction score
1,240
Location
Bothell
Next season, Russ will have a cap hit for the Hawks of $37 million. However, if we trade him we will incur $26m in dead money (remaining signing bonus) and the team that acquires him will get him for cap hits of just $24m ('22) and then $27m ('23).

Will Russ be worth $24 million to a QB needy team that has been able to stock up on young talent due to a run of bad seasons? Definitely. A young team that thinks they can run the ball would love to get a relatively cheap QB that opposing defenses will want to play deep against. The reason why McVay gave up two firsts and a third for Stafford was so that he could stretch the field and open up the Rams running game.

That being said, I don't see us trading Russ for picks for the same reason we didn't trade him last off-season. Taking a huge dead money hit in 2022 would likely lead it to being a tank year, and Pete and John have never been inclined to tank a season particularly if we are coming off a bad season already. If we do trade Russ I think it may be for another QB who they think would be a better fit for Waldron's scheme and any picks would be a secondary part of it.
 

Keyhawk

Active member
Joined
Aug 21, 2009
Messages
487
Reaction score
55
One first-round pick plus some other picks. He goes to a team that is invested in or will invest in the O line.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
5,669
Reaction score
1,707
I think there are so few teams that would be willing to pay the price for Russell, now that the league has him "figured out". We'd be lucky to get a mid-first-rounder for him now.

Despite having been "figured out", Russell can still be highly effective in the right situation.

When Russell also had Marshawn and the Read Option threat, it made him more dangerous all around. These days, the primary QBs that cause problems for defenses with their legs include Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, and Kyler Murray, but not so much Russell anymore.
 

CPHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
4,904
Reaction score
953
Trade him to Detroit for Goff, and two 1s. Grab Thibs either top pick.

While we are at it, send Adams to Detroit also for a 3-4th rounder.
 
Top