New CBA Legal Claim Post Ballot Edit (Eric Reid)

Good info.. links provided.

If true, this seems down right shady as hell from Goodell and owners...

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/28972490/eric-reid-calls-probe-revote-post-ballot-changes-cba

The most straight forward solution is to amend the language to reflect that which the players already voted. Instead, per Reids establish MO, he wants to rock the boat more and throw the baby out with the bathwater and revote. This seems more of a political move than a desire to get it right.

I despise those who would co-opt opportunities to further personal interests under the guise of helping others. Meaning he likely voted against it in the first place, so is looking for any chance possible to try to revert it in its entirety.

The ESPN grandstanding was yet another example of an all to common "guilty by assertion smear job". Not to be confused with good practices of Journalism.

Yesterday, the NFLPA received a letter from one player’s lawyer claiming that the NFLPA made a substantive and significant change to the new CBA after it was ratified. The lawyer’s claim is completely false. Yes, the NFLPA fixed a cross-reference in the final version of the new CBA; no, that cross-reference reflects no substantive difference whatsoever from what players were told about the proposed CBA and what the players voted to approve

Click to expand...

The Truth About Claimed Changes to the New CBA’s Disability Offset Provision >>> [urltargetblank]https://nflpaweb.blob.core.windows.net/media/Default/PDFs/CBA%20Truth%20About.pdf?_cldee=Z2VvcmdlLmF0YWxsYWhAbmZscGEuY29t&recipientid=contact-0cbeab0f3810e811813fe0071b6a8231-f7cef72748e64222a1f387989ca52224&esid=89848310-c866-ea11-a811-000d3a1b142f[/urltargetblank]