Warford cut

Bobblehead":wpt1v6nt said:

Well if we can't get Clowney.. lets get this guy... if we can.

Click to expand...

Sun Tzu":5cn20d0e said:

Bobblehead":5cn20d0e said:

Well if we can't get Clowney.. lets get this guy... if we can.

Click to expand...

Why? You see that we have some cap space and want to use it up as quickly as possible. Our cap usage is already heavily tilted to the offensive side of the ball. Why add a guy to a position group that already has plenty of competition at a position that we just drafted for? At a certain point we (fans and coaches) should start giving some of the young drafted and internally developed guys a chance to play rather than constantly bringing in veteran band-aids.

Click to expand...

hawkfan68":29mdj0oq said:

Sun Tzu":29mdj0oq said:

Bobblehead":29mdj0oq said:

Well if we can't get Clowney.. lets get this guy... if we can.

Click to expand...

Why? You see that we have some cap space and want to use it up as quickly as possible. Our cap usage is already heavily tilted to the offensive side of the ball. Why add a guy to a position group that already has plenty of competition at a position that we just drafted for? At a certain point we (fans and coaches) should start giving some of the young drafted and internally developed guys a chance to play rather than constantly bringing in veteran band-aids.

Click to expand...

In most cases I would agree. However, we're talking about a player who has been a pro-bowler for past 3 seasons. Iupati is penciled in as the starting LG at the moment not some young guys. if that's the case, Warford > Iupati. The left side of the Seahawk OL would be really tough. Almost Jones-Hutch tough...almost. Dump Iupati and Hollister. Plenty of room left to add Clowney/Griffen and Warford.

Click to expand...