Search results

  1. L

    This Week's Enemy Fan Forums: **DIVISIONAL PLAYOFF EDITION**

    The defense cannot put pressure on Newton. I am not sure what you are watching. But don't worry, Wilson has a tendency to play very poorly on the first three quarters and finally wakes up in the forth quarter. As long as the opponent's kicker miss a short field goal, we would say Wilson has...
  2. L

    10-6 will be enough to win the NFC West this year

    Both of you are correct. I say we have less than 0.5% chance of finishing 10-6 or better, so it would round to 0%, but technically not never.
  3. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    You have not learned and have not come to your senses. You don't seem to have any logic. I can't say I am surprised, because there are always people out there who are irrationnal.
  4. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    You don't need to use the word immoral to mean just that. Period. Then again Kam doesn't owe anyone an explanation to play or not to play the game.
  5. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    I already told you I have not changed my opinion on this issue and told you to look back at my posts. What is wrong with you? How can you still don't understand? You are completely wrong again. See below starting with you:
  6. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    You don't seem to understand. I am neutral in this. If you looked back at all of my post on this topic, I have never said the Seahawks should give Chancellor the contract he wanted. I have never said the current contract is too low for Chancellor. All I am saying is that no one should be so...
  7. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    It is not that hard to google. Here are a few: Don't blame Kam Chancellor for his holdout in Seattle https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q ... 8427,d.cGU As cap grows, NFL teams fear more Kam Chancellor holdouts http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/20 ... -holdouts/ Seahawks need to find...
  8. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    Trying to say I am Kam because no body can be on Kam's side is quite stupid. All you need to do is google for a minute you would be able to find quite a lot of articles and comments who are neutral or on Kam's side. Who on the world would think those are all Kam? This is beyond stupid.
  9. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    Somehow not playing is at fault is clearly an incorrect assumption. There has never been an assumption in this country that all hold outs are the player's fault. I don't think you will get it. Some people are just too stupid to understand, but I won't say this is your fault because I don't...
  10. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    You still don't get it. You can't fault a player for not playing. Anyone can choose to play or not to play. I don't know how many times I have to repeat that.
  11. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    My focus was the morality issue. See the comments below: A lot of the comments are link to morality. So when you say no one is arguing... you are wrong. It is a fact that there have been many hold out since the new CBA. I don't think I even need to provide any examples. You fault...
  12. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    A contract is realy NOT a MORAL agreement that says “I will show up no matter what and if I don’t, then I’m a greedy selfish bad person”. A contract is a businees agreement which states the terms of compensation IF a player chooses to play and IF a team chooses to keep him on the roster, and...
  13. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    Thats part of the contract. Why is this so hard to understand. If the team doesn't want the player to hold out, then the team needs to negotiate that into the contract (for exmample Kam would owe the team $100 billion if he holds out). But since the market won't allow it (because there will...
  14. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    One way is to put an "out" into to the contract. The other way is just don't show up. It is amazing how some people don't know how the real world works.
  15. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    You can play with the meaning of "rip up a contract", but at the end outside of injury or death a team can cut a player before the contract ends but the player have no way of getting out of a contract. This is what we meant unfair.
  16. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    When the Seahawks cut players because of performance and salary cap reasons did you criticized the team for not HONORING the contract? If you did, at least you are not biased. At the end of the day the team ultimately can’t force the player to do the one thing the team wants the player to do...
  17. L

    MMQB: In defense of Kam Chancellor

    The way NFL contracts are structured, teams can cut a player for whatever reason, including performance, off the field issues, salary cap reasons, etc. Players on the other hand, can't terminate a contract at will. Even if the player retires, if he comes back in a season, the original contract...

Latest posts

Top