Andrew Luck or . . . Matt Hasselbeck?

XxXdragonXxX

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
3,115
Reaction score
87
Location
Enumclaw, WA
Ramfan128":80oppvg5 said:
Likely that Luck was playing injured for a while, which would be why he struggled.

I think if/when Luck is truly 100%, he will start. But I think they should go with Hasselbeck for the rest of the year, because regardless of who the QB is, the Colts have no chance at winning the AFC anyway. Might as well let Luck really heal up.

Injuries don't excuse s plethora of poor decisions. Unless he was playing concussed.
 

Seahawkfan80

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 5, 2011
Messages
11,225
Reaction score
619
IndyHawk":7rvhodf6 said:
I'd stick with Hass until the magic runs out.The team seems to respond under him better.Luck is the future but Hass is for the here and now.

THis plus the off the turf mentoring will make Luck a lot better player. Learning on the field during battle with an opponent helps, but mentoring while Luck is out may bring better dividends in the future. Learn on the Surface Pro 2 and then bring it on the field when you are ready Luck.


Back later all, need to go wash my mouth out with soap.
 
Top