If I had to choose, I'd go with Baldwin. I love me some Tate, I really do, but Baldwin shows up bigger in big games, and seems to have a better repoire with Wilson. When Wilson scrambles around, it's mostly Baldwin he ends up finding now that Rice is off the field.
I'd like to keep both if we can afford it. I also think Kearse is going to get better, and one of Tate, Baldwin or Kearse will be gone after next year. Pete's going to want a bigger bodied WR for a better red zone target.
Tate plays bigger than his size and brings value on punt returns. Kearse is the largest of the 3. Baldwin seems to get better separation and makes some incredible clutch catches, but none of these guys are huge red zone targets that can win jump balls in a crowded end zone insde the red zone. Of the three, I think Kearse hasn't reached his ceiling yet, while we're probably nearing the top of the performance spectrum for both Baldwin and Tate.
I'd like to keep both if we can afford it. I also think Kearse is going to get better, and one of Tate, Baldwin or Kearse will be gone after next year. Pete's going to want a bigger bodied WR for a better red zone target.
Tate plays bigger than his size and brings value on punt returns. Kearse is the largest of the 3. Baldwin seems to get better separation and makes some incredible clutch catches, but none of these guys are huge red zone targets that can win jump balls in a crowded end zone insde the red zone. Of the three, I think Kearse hasn't reached his ceiling yet, while we're probably nearing the top of the performance spectrum for both Baldwin and Tate.
