erik2690":bd6ktzfu said:
So you are under the impression that 'played a BIG part in helping to get us those trophies' means purely that 1 game where we actually receive the trophy? You have to be in that game to even have a chance. So he could have played like shit for the first 17, but if he had been a beast that game you would credit him with a 'BIG part in helping to get us those trophies'? That logic seems flawed to me. Very flawed honestly. I would argue he did have a big part in getting us there and still agree he played very badly in the GB game. I don't think those are mutually exclusive at all.
Nice strawman.
What I actually meant to get across was that in those NFCCG games, Wilson wasn't particularly good. In particular, his starts have been pretty rubbish, and it's a consistent pattern including those championship games and both Super Bowl appearances.
But you can credit him for those games, I guess, if that's how you see it. Is it valid to credit him for inconsistent-to-poor play in big games while the defense remains consistently excellent? Up to each to figure out on their own, I guess. For me it's a no-brainer - our defense won those championships.