SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
+1,000
Yeah, this thread going here was pretty damn predictable.drdiags":2349py95 said:Not sure what anyone expects when every time you look up one of our guys wants to create a thread about how some Seahawk player or coach compares to a 9er. I agree, there is a lot of obsessing about the 9ers. There were similar feelings towards the Rams back in the Martz days but nothing that compares to what is happening now. And it isn't just .NET. Our sports talk, our bloggers and even our team website have fed into this mindset.
Why not put these in the NFL forum so the main forum could be just about the Seahawks? There hasn't been that many threads that don't eventually have some comparison to the 9ers made by one of our own fans.
I just hope that Mr. Stlouis guy doesn't have the last laugh. Carry on.
Not so fast there, the 'Concept' of That stellar Secondary? is/was guys that Pete, and John chose for the Coach to work with.Smelly McUgly":3w0pmkea said:In that case, why give Carroll credit for anything? Hell, we have a DBs coach. We have a coach for the safeties. Let's give credit to secondary coaches instead of Carroll for developing Sherman, Chancellor, Browner, Lane, Thurmond, etc., etc. because our secondary is beastly.
If you don't think that Harbaugh doesn't have his input on the OL, I don't know what to tell you. I hate this overrated douchetool as much as you do, but he deserves credit for helping to develop that OL, which has former fat sacks of crap like Anthony Davis that have been nicely developed over the past two years. Lest we forget, that OL was not that great with Singletary. Harbaugh gets credit for developing it in my view.
Nope, I for one don't give a shit about the just as homeristic niners fans, nor do I have any intrest in what they have to say about my Seahawks.mretrade":1tfx8qod said:themunn":1tfx8qod said:mretrade":1tfx8qod said:Yeah seriously. This forum has become more of a 49ers/Seahawks forum. Most Seahawk fans seem obsessed with discussing the Niners, Kaepernick, and Harbaugh. Yet the Niner boards I go to don't really care that much about the Seahawks.
I wouldn't know because I don't visit niner boards.
BECAUSE I'M A SEAHAWKS FAN.
I am a Niners fan but follow the Seahawks because I am from the 206. Does that make you angry or something? I know a lot more about the Seahawks than a lot of Seahawks fans.
Actually Nolan had more to do with it, but Singletary did a good job as well.warden":1pboabpf said:With the top coaches list coming out and Harbaugh being rated much higher then Carroll, I think they forgot to mention one big difference
Harbaugh did not really build the 49ers roster. Singletary had more to do with building the roster. Yes Harbaugh made some good improvements with Aldon Smith and Kaepernick but in all reality he inherited a very good team. 20 of his 22 starters were all ready in place when he arrived.
8 sacks > 19, 20 sacks. Right. (methinks you meant "led the rookies in the league," like Aldon Smith did last year, except Aldon had 14).
Of course, the irony here is that Scott McCloughan built the nucleus of BOTH of our rosters, if I'm not mistaken... lmao.
mretrade":il547u6e said:There is still a stupid crazy amount of obsession with the 49ers on here. Most 49er forums have zero to one Seahawks thread tops. So if you want less 49er fans talking here, post less about the 49ers.
warden":ju7nefgc said:With the top coaches list coming out and Harbaugh being rated much higher then Carroll, I think they forgot to mention one big difference
Harbaugh did not really build the 49ers roster. Singletary had more to do with building the roster. Yes Harbaugh made some good improvements with Aldon Smith and Kaepernick but in all reality he inherited a very good team. 20 of his 22 starters were all ready in place when he arrived.
Now Carroll completely built his team. Very few remain from the previous regime. Red, Unger and Mebane come to mind but after that you really have to think about it. Yes JS gets some credit, but that hire was also Pete Carroll's decision
chevelle03":1zzhcnbv said:One has coached a team to a national championship, the other is a total dick.
BirdsCommaAngry":ypm3utz0 said:That's a pretty silly thing to hold against somebody. Harbaugh might be way worse than PC when it comes to rebuilding an entire team but we won't get to know until we see the guy in a situation where he actually has to rebuild a franchise at the pro level.
Besides, when we're measuring people like that, it just becomes the same argument about who's better between the guy who did more with more help or the guy who did less with less help. Do you guys saying PC is better because he had less to work with think Peyton Manning is better than Tom Brady because his teams were usually worse? That Curt Warner is better than Shaun Alexander because his blocking was worse? That Largent is better than Jerry Rice because he didn't have HoFers throwing him the ball?
If PC is better because he was in a worse situation and this logic is sound, then surely those who believe it will choose players like Manning over Brady, Warner over Alexander, Largent over Rice, etc. That or people have made their minds to say one person is better and are now shaping the evidence to fit the conclusion. If you ask me for a "right" answer, I'd have to defer you to the upcoming season(s) where we'll get to see more of these guys doing what they do best with PC acting kinda like a giddy kid while winning football games and Harbaugh acting like a not so giddy kid while winning football games. Either way, people become the best on the field - not from what's said about them on a message board.