zchurch74
Member
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2015
- Messages
- 917
- Reaction score
- 4
Can This team be successful without Earl? I just don’t see us making the playoffs or any continued success without him.
vin.couve12":3fwd9w0w said:ET plays deep middle and almost never makes a play on the deep sideline passes. It's literally not his job. This is on those particular CBs. ET would not have changed it.
chris98251":3f5kg1tt said:vin.couve12":3f5kg1tt said:ET plays deep middle and almost never makes a play on the deep sideline passes. It's literally not his job. This is on those particular CBs. ET would not have changed it.
WTH have you been, the over the top coverage on those deep routes has been a bread and butter of our coverage since we drafted him.
NFSeahawks628":14jwnygg said:chris98251":14jwnygg said:vin.couve12":14jwnygg said:ET plays deep middle and almost never makes a play on the deep sideline passes. It's literally not his job. This is on those particular CBs. ET would not have changed it.
WTH have you been, the over the top coverage on those deep routes has been a bread and butter of our coverage since we drafted him.
Agreed what a weird post, lol. Earl literally would have been there and the Seahawks would have won.
Best case, they have Kam help one and Earl the other. Worst case he chooses 1, likely preferring to leave Sherman 1 on 1 on an island than a rookie. However, the reason Earl's been so good is because traditionally he's had the speed and instincts to not break to one or the other until the QB has made his choice and then he breaks for that WR.MontanaHawk05":1pxxehxd said:NFSeahawks628":1pxxehxd said:chris98251":1pxxehxd said:vin.couve12":1pxxehxd said:ET plays deep middle and almost never makes a play on the deep sideline passes. It's literally not his job. This is on those particular CBs. ET would not have changed it.
WTH have you been, the over the top coverage on those deep routes has been a bread and butter of our coverage since we drafted him.
Agreed what a weird post, lol. Earl literally would have been there and the Seahawks would have won.
So what happens if the OC just sends two deep verts down both sidelines? Earl can't duplicate himself.
Thats why sherman is thereMontanaHawk05":2ux343ta said:NFSeahawks628":2ux343ta said:chris98251":2ux343ta said:vin.couve12":2ux343ta said:ET plays deep middle and almost never makes a play on the deep sideline passes. It's literally not his job. This is on those particular CBs. ET would not have changed it.
WTH have you been, the over the top coverage on those deep routes has been a bread and butter of our coverage since we drafted him.
Agreed what a weird post, lol. Earl literally would have been there and the Seahawks would have won.
So what happens if the OC just sends two deep verts down both sidelines? Earl can't duplicate himself.
MontanaHawk05":2i214knr said:[
So what happens if the OC just sends two deep verts down both sidelines? .
DJrmb":1f4z8ci0 said:Best case, they have Kam help one and Earl the other. Worst case he chooses 1, likely preferring to leave Sherman 1 on 1 on an island than a rookie. However, the reason Earl's been so good is because traditionally he's had the speed and instincts to not break to one or the other until the QB has made his choice and then he breaks for that WR.MontanaHawk05":1f4z8ci0 said:NFSeahawks628":1f4z8ci0 said:chris98251":1f4z8ci0 said:WTH have you been, the over the top coverage on those deep routes has been a bread and butter of our coverage since we drafted him.
Agreed what a weird post, lol. Earl literally would have been there and the Seahawks would have won.
So what happens if the OC just sends two deep verts down both sidelines? Earl can't duplicate himself.