Agree to disagree. Wilson played well, yes, but he wasn't yet at that level. It's reasonable to assume Flynn could have performed at a somewhat similar level. The running game and defense was always the heart of that team. From that SB to the NFC Championship where Russ threw 4 interceptions the following year. Not knocking on Wilson at all here, he got consistently better and became a great player. But I do believe we could have still won the SB without him in 13-14'. The only time we were challenged on route to the title was vs the 49ers.No that’s flat out false. Wilson was a monster early on and like I said had multiple 4th quarter theatrics. The whole team was special including young Russ
I literally said the defense and Lynch were the reasons they won it. One of the very top defenses of all time. Defense could still singlehandedly win SB's back then. It did again two years later when the Broncos won it with a washed ManningYou're high if you think that team makes either Super Bowl without Russ. OR the Defense. OR Lynch.
Got it. No arguements just calling me high. Meanwhile I post facts and logic.You're not supposed to drink the bong water.
According to my "sources"
I see you are unable to stay on topic in the current thread. Unfortunate. You seem to be developing a very unhealthy obsession with me, bringing me up in every thread. Let's call it WDS (Welshers derangement syndrome)Facts? Ok
Like the "fact" that Baker was linked to Carolina? Something we all knew a month ago???
Gentlemen, kindly cease the personal comments about each other as that leads to unreadable threads and creates an atmosphere of hostility here.
You each are entitled to your own beliefs and if there are objective reasons supporting your views state those instead of comments against the person of the other.
Lets move on.
Yes it was nothing personal, it was all light hearted from me as well. I understand not hijacking the the thread though, so happy to stop. Thanks for your tact in taking care of the situation Jammer! Our great mods are one of the reasons this site rocks.Fair enough. I thought we were just messing with each other. Nothing personal. I'll gladly bow out.
Pretty much how I feel. Russ brought a level of dynamism to the offense that we didn't have with a Flynn or Tjack.I side more with austinslater25 in regards to how underappreciated young Russ was. I fear after another 6-7 years or so he will fall victim of "Shaun Alexander Syndrome" where he is barely appreciated by 12's years after his tenure with the team is up. This narrative that it was the defense (and maybe Lynch) alone that made us champions is false. Without Russell I doubt we make it to back-to-back Super Bowls, winning one. Go back and watch every game from 2013 and 2014 and yes, while we had a historic, bad ass defense, watch all the amazing, incredible plays Russ made on those teams.
The fact is, the TEAM was excellent, including #3 who will go down as the best QB in franchise history, book it.
the running game exploded in large part because of Russ and Welshers you keep ignoring the 4th quarter success and multiple games Russ won on game winning drives. Statistically he had close to 4,000 yards, was the leading rushing QB, didn't turn the ball over, hit on the explosive play and had 30 touchdowns that year. He was already one of the best in the league at that point.Agree to disagree. Wilson played well, yes, but he wasn't yet at that level. It's reasonable to assume Flynn could have performed at a somewhat similar level. The running game and defense was always the heart of that team. From that SB to the NFC Championship where Russ threw 4 interceptions the following year. Not knocking on Wilson at all here, he got consistently better and became a great player. But I do believe we could have still won the SB without him in 13-14'. The only time we were challenged on route to the title was vs the 49ers.