jkitsune
New member
- Joined
- Mar 5, 2007
- Messages
- 3,339
- Reaction score
- 0
Taking $3M - $5M less in the TOTAL value of a contract is not such a large discount that I couldn't see it happening. Assuming Bruce is likely to get a 4-year deal given his age, that's about $1M less per year, and assuming there are signing bonuses, etc built in, it's probably even less than $1M on the actual salary.
That said, I don't really understand the idea that it's 'dumb' to take more money to play for a lesser team. I know some fans don't like to hear it, but this is a job, and ultimately players (like the rest of us) want to provide as much as possible for themselves and their family, especially given that most NFL players have very short careers, and many don't have great job prospects after the NFL. Very few players are in the position that Tom Brady was to take significantly less on his paycheck in order to stay with the Patriots and help them out.
That said, I don't really understand the idea that it's 'dumb' to take more money to play for a lesser team. I know some fans don't like to hear it, but this is a job, and ultimately players (like the rest of us) want to provide as much as possible for themselves and their family, especially given that most NFL players have very short careers, and many don't have great job prospects after the NFL. Very few players are in the position that Tom Brady was to take significantly less on his paycheck in order to stay with the Patriots and help them out.