Sports Hernia
Well-known member
Looks like the "Facebook hero method" was an epic fail?seahawksny":2iqpxnjm said:TRADE GRAHAM FOR SOME OFFENSIVE LINEMAN.
ITS JUST NOT WORKING
Looks like the "Facebook hero method" was an epic fail?seahawksny":2iqpxnjm said:TRADE GRAHAM FOR SOME OFFENSIVE LINEMAN.
ITS JUST NOT WORKING
chet380":1ermme13 said:So what does crow taste like?seahawksny":1ermme13 said:TRADE GRAHAM FOR SOME OFFENSIVE LINEMAN.
ITS JUST NOT WORKING
jkitsune":1vj99ppm said:I wish we could keep gameday reaction posts in the gameday forum.
Yeah :34853_doh: , at this rate, he's only on track with about 100 catches for 1,250 Yards, and 14 TD's.sc85sis":3beiksas said:7 receptions for 83 yards and a TD
Probably like a cross between a Spotted Owl & a Bald Eagle? :lol:chet380":1uaja7qd said:So what does crow taste like?seahawksny":1uaja7qd said:TRADE GRAHAM FOR SOME OFFENSIVE LINEMAN.
ITS JUST NOT WORKING
MontanaHawk05":1x7ghttq said:Hawkstorian":1x7ghttq said:I remember when I was much younger and took it all way too seriously.
Me, too. I couldn't get through the 2005 Redskins playoff game. Took a walk around the neighborhood at halftime, came home to Mom hollering something about "Darrell Jackson, Darrell Jackson!"
Now I'm like...losses are cool, man. Whatever.
Threedee":14x67tld said:I love book.
You was crazy back then.Hawkstorian":1087tpe5 said:I remember when I was much younger and took it all way too seriously.
scutterhawk":lscd56cw said:Probably like a cross between a Spotted Owl & a Bald Eagle? :lol:chet380":lscd56cw said:So what does crow taste like?
This. 'Aints used him pretty much as a WR.sc85sis":2a4d9a6y said:There is no "diva" act with regard to Graham and blocking, he just has never had to do it before and isn't very good at it at this point.
Boom84":3v98rf0s said:Look at some games from last year's Saints performances. I didn't see any performance that led you to believe his heart was into blocking.
Yes, he's not been asked to do this much blocking before, but Seattle's offensive identity is clearly established as one much more run-heavy that what Payton and Brees run. Graham knew that upon the trade, Michael Bennett indicated it was a weakness for Jimmy they exploited, and Jimmy mentioned in the preseason that he'd block more and be good at it. Well the effectiveness as a blocker has not shown up. If it shows up hallelujah, but I don't see any evidence to indicate that will happen.
Again, nice player, just not the best fit for what this team needs from the TE position in my opinion.
CPHawk":2l5h8uh9 said:Boom84":2l5h8uh9 said:Look at some games from last year's Saints performances. I didn't see any performance that led you to believe his heart was into blocking.
Yes, he's not been asked to do this much blocking before, but Seattle's offensive identity is clearly established as one much more run-heavy that what Payton and Brees run. Graham knew that upon the trade, Michael Bennett indicated it was a weakness for Jimmy they exploited, and Jimmy mentioned in the preseason that he'd block more and be good at it. Well the effectiveness as a blocker has not shown up. If it shows up hallelujah, but I don't see any evidence to indicate that will happen.
Again, nice player, just not the best fit for what this team needs from the TE position in my opinion.
Your entire argument is moot, given the fact he wasn't asked to block. 60-70% one time he lined up out wide. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
Boom84":88sxqo5s said:CPHawk":88sxqo5s said:Boom84":88sxqo5s said:Look at some games from last year's Saints performances. I didn't see any performance that led you to believe his heart was into blocking.
Yes, he's not been asked to do this much blocking before, but Seattle's offensive identity is clearly established as one much more run-heavy that what Payton and Brees run. Graham knew that upon the trade, Michael Bennett indicated it was a weakness for Jimmy they exploited, and Jimmy mentioned in the preseason that he'd block more and be good at it. Well the effectiveness as a blocker has not shown up. If it shows up hallelujah, but I don't see any evidence to indicate that will happen.
Again, nice player, just not the best fit for what this team needs from the TE position in my opinion.
Your entire argument is moot, given the fact he wasn't asked to block. 60-70% one time he lined up out wide. Why is this so hard for you to understand?
That IS the point, why are we splitting him out so much? When doing so, what happens, or more clearly who lines up at the TE position to block when we need to run and control the edge? Will that be Graham or another player? Today it seemed to be Helfet was more effective when we needed to control the edge on running plays. The team even inserted Alvin Bailey as a extra blocker. My thought here is if Graham could at all be an asset in this area, those players might not have had to come in to help the offense in this resspect.
So if 60-70% of the time he's split wide, then in essence he's a slot receiver, NOT a TE. Maybe Graham likes that as he certainly wanted to be paid like a WR heading into last season (which he went to arbitration for) with the Saints.
Ultimately, what has the team gained with Graham split 60-70% of the time that the team could not have gotten from a combined contribution of Willson, Lockett, Helfet, and Matthews? Even giving the benefit of the doubt of Lockett not being a known commodity at the time Graham was acquired (he wasn't even drafted by the team yet), Luke Willson and Cooper Helfet definitely were. If Graham is not going to be utilized or when utilized in the blocking aspect of the position will be a liability, I don't believe his acquisition was worth it for this team.