TheLegendOfBoom
Well-known member
Anyone here think Seattle played Jackson on Adams yesterday to somewhat “test” what they have with Jackson?
The easy strategy would have been put Woolen on Adams all snaps. But Seattle lined up Jackson on Adams on a lot of snaps.
I think Seattle wanted to know how Jackson would respond against a top WR and see if he was up to par.
For the most part, considering a lack of pass rush and the Raiders going run heavy, Jackson did okay for the second tier corner.
However, if, the Raiders went pass heavy, I think Jackson would have been torched on a lot of plays and Adams would have had at least 130 yards and a TD.
Jackson, opposite of Woolen, was okay, I think Carroll, is still unset with corner opposite of Woolen.
Jackson, may not be the starting guy next season…
The easy strategy would have been put Woolen on Adams all snaps. But Seattle lined up Jackson on Adams on a lot of snaps.
I think Seattle wanted to know how Jackson would respond against a top WR and see if he was up to par.
For the most part, considering a lack of pass rush and the Raiders going run heavy, Jackson did okay for the second tier corner.
However, if, the Raiders went pass heavy, I think Jackson would have been torched on a lot of plays and Adams would have had at least 130 yards and a TD.
Jackson, opposite of Woolen, was okay, I think Carroll, is still unset with corner opposite of Woolen.
Jackson, may not be the starting guy next season…