Scottemojo
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 14,663
- Reaction score
- 1
Because of the varying nature of one domestic abuse case vs another, I am pretty uneasy about blanket punishment policies.
Cartire":ybtgxezl said:Its a good collaborated story. Seems like something the NFL would like to put out in the public to help justify their light sentencing. The fact that they didnt, tells me its a good story, and nothing more.
kearly":25r945xr said:Cartire":25r945xr said:Its a good collaborated story. Seems like something the NFL would like to put out in the public to help justify their light sentencing. The fact that they didnt, tells me its a good story, and nothing more.
Maybe I am misunderstanding you, but to suggest the NFL had any impact on the police reports is truther level absurdism.
Regarding the lack of charges, mutual domestic violence is not grounds for legal action. That's the reason why charges were not pursued by the state of New Jersey.
Deadspin":3dqcm7rr said:Domestic violence offenses still fall under the league's Personal Conduct Policy, with which the NFLPA inexplicably handed the NFL unilateral control over discipline not specifically covered in the CBA. Players will still have the right to appeal their punishments and likely get them reduced. Literally nothing has changed.
Kind of misleading though, because most violations of things don't even have a suspension requirement in the first place. The NFL didn't have to suspend Ray Rice at all, for example.SeatownJay":3kpfguz3 said:Deadspin has a measured take that basically says nothing has really changed.
RolandDeschain":195tgtg1 said:Kind of misleading though, because most violations of things don't even have a suspension requirement in the first place. The NFL didn't have to suspend Ray Rice at all, for example.SeatownJay":195tgtg1 said:Deadspin has a measured take that basically says nothing has really changed.
Would not surprise me AT ALL.Cartire":1169i3mj said:All leads back to 2 games being a compromise. I'm convinced, now more then ever, that Rice had his dick out during the altercation.
You made my point better than I did in this thread and the other.Cartire":3av4c9wn said:RolandDeschain":3av4c9wn said:Kind of misleading though, because most violations of things don't even have a suspension requirement in the first place. The NFL didn't have to suspend Ray Rice at all, for example.SeatownJay":3av4c9wn said:Deadspin has a measured take that basically says nothing has really changed.
Of course they didn't have too. But this is also what I was saying Roland. Two games has no precedent. And I think the NFLPA threatening fighting if it was more was nothing more then a bluff. The public would have supported 6-8 games and the NFLPA would have gotten bad press trying to fight it.
All leads back to 2 games being a compromise. I'm convinced, now more then ever, that Rice had his dick out during the altercation.
gowazzu02":2dlck6jh said:Interesting..... Now Rice wasn't charged with anything.... the video was damning but legaly nothing happened to him.
Now are we suspending people for being charged or for being accuesd?
Cause if all it takes is being accused. I can get a lady to swear Kap upper cutted her. I have a couple buddies on SPD that could draw up a fake police report. Boom 6 games!
RedAlice":2as6243r said:In addition to focusing on domestic violence and sexual assault, we will continue to maintain strong policies regarding weapons offenses. We are similarly working to strengthen our response to impaired driving. We have sought – unsuccessfully – for several years to obtain the NFLPA’s agreement to more stringent discipline for DUI, including mandatory deactivation for the game immediately following an arrest and a minimum two-game suspension for a first violation of law.
That is from the memo sent out to owners.
Wonder how this affects the ruling on Aldon not delivered yet.