No sacks

razor150

New member
Joined
Jul 10, 2009
Messages
2,078
Reaction score
0
Did you see how much he got hit? No sacks just means he didn't have the ball when he got hit.
 

hawk45

Active member
Joined
Sep 27, 2009
Messages
10,009
Reaction score
16
Yeah, it's great Wilson got rid of it, but his protection wasn't any better. In Pete's presser he mentioned Wilson is banged up, well no sh**t, and it's only getting worse. I take nothing positive away from today's game in terms of pass protection.

Run-blocking, yeah they did well esp. later on when we handed it off more.
 

Latest posts

Top