Should the Seahawks draft a WR with the #63 or #95 pick?

[Basis4day]

One thing for sure, those guys are going to be awful antsy waiting for #63 to come up while many of their boards players get picked. I'm not sure they can do that, and really I wouldn't put trading a player (s) out of the equasion.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a player get traded either, actually. Three players spring to mind...Michael Bennett, Bruce Irvin and Lynch spring to mind. I'd be gutted to see any of them go, but wouldn't be shocked.

Trade Lynch after all the contract talk just to make him come back? Bennett is the only one with any trade value because he has multiple years left on a cheap deal. I don't see any trades for those players.

 

[Lords of Scythia]

Hawks won't draft a WR according to this report:

"The team feels strong about their wide receiver depth so do not expect the Seahawks to draft anyone there."



http://www.sportsworldreport.com/articl ... ennett.htm

Especially after they got Graham.

 

[McGruff]

Hawks won't draft a WR according to this report:

"The team feels strong about their wide receiver depth so do not expect the Seahawks to draft anyone there."



http://www.sportsworldreport.com/articl ... ennett.htm

Especially after they got Graham.

I don't believe a single thing I read this week.

 

[Lords of Scythia]

One thing for sure, those guys are going to be awful antsy waiting for #63 to come up while many of their boards players get picked. I'm not sure they can do that, and really I wouldn't put trading a player (s) out of the equasion.

I wouldn't be surprised to see a player get traded either, actually. Three players spring to mind...Michael Bennett, Bruce Irvin and Lynch spring to mind. I'd be gutted to see any of them go, but wouldn't be shocked.

What about Okung? That wouldn't surprise me any more than Unger. Schneider's shown he's fearless and utterly confident in his ability to find players in the draft, and wants to ditch the old broken-down ones.