SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
Easy to say from the couch or from the stands
SoulfishHawk":m9vivu4v said:Easy to say from the couch or from the stands
Siouxhawk":1iqumawv said:Lockett has had some big catches this year. But so has PRich, Doug, Jimmy, et all. I'd say we have one of the better receiving corps in the league.
From USA today10. Seattle Seahawks: This offense will likely prevent TE Jimmy Graham from being the force he once was, but he still rebounded from a serious knee injury to have a strong second year in Seattle (65 receptions, 923 yards). Doug Baldwin deservedly remains Russell Wilson's preferred target, and Tyler Lockett or Paul Richardson could make a claim for the No. 2 receiver post.
And this has what relevance to the topic at hand? Looks like a preseason guesstimate.chris98251":2t6cu8et said:Siouxhawk":2t6cu8et said:Lockett has had some big catches this year. But so has PRich, Doug, Jimmy, et all. I'd say we have one of the better receiving corps in the league.
From USA today10. Seattle Seahawks: This offense will likely prevent TE Jimmy Graham from being the force he once was, but he still rebounded from a serious knee injury to have a strong second year in Seattle (65 receptions, 923 yards). Doug Baldwin deservedly remains Russell Wilson's preferred target, and Tyler Lockett or Paul Richardson could make a claim for the No. 2 receiver post.
Not bad but more middle of the pack.
Siouxhawk":2q50ec2v said:And this has what relevance to the topic at hand? Looks like a preseason guesstimate.chris98251":2q50ec2v said:Siouxhawk":2q50ec2v said:Lockett has had some big catches this year. But so has PRich, Doug, Jimmy, et all. I'd say we have one of the better receiving corps in the league.
From USA today10. Seattle Seahawks: This offense will likely prevent TE Jimmy Graham from being the force he once was, but he still rebounded from a serious knee injury to have a strong second year in Seattle (65 receptions, 923 yards). Doug Baldwin deservedly remains Russell Wilson's preferred target, and Tyler Lockett or Paul Richardson could make a claim for the No. 2 receiver post.
Not bad but more middle of the pack.
Siouxhawk":2ovw7zgy said:Lockett has had some big catches this year. But so has PRich, Doug, Jimmy, et all. I'd say we have one of the better receiving corps in the league.
PRich has caught a few of those intermediate out patterns along the sideline, but yeah, I think the feeling when they drafted Darboh was to be a younger, hopefully more reliable, version of Kearse.adeltaY":12zaoj7a said:Siouxhawk":12zaoj7a said:Lockett has had some big catches this year. But so has PRich, Doug, Jimmy, et all. I'd say we have one of the better receiving corps in the league.
They're excellent deep threats mostly. Too bad our OL can't hold up long enough consistently enough to make deep shots viable. Doug is the only guy we have who plays the "possession receiver" role really well, but he can also go deep. Hopefully Darboh can step up and fulfill that role. We saw him catch a slant pass on a RPO in one of the past games (Titans?) which was nice.
Popeyejones":1lffg4dy said:Well, I mean, we already know it wasn’t sustainable because it wasn’t anywhere close to being sustained.
As for it hypothetically having been sustainable, that’s always possible, but whenever someone who you already have data on goes on an all time best historic tear over a short stretch you have to decide if they’ve suddenly become leaps and bounds better than what we even considered possible before, or if like every other wildly improbable conclusion resulting from a small sample size, you should predict regression back to the mean.
Since that truly epic and historic run the prediction — Russell Wilson is a very good QB, but probably not leaps and bounds better than the best QB who will ever play the position — was the correct one.
It’s no different than looking at Baldwin on that run and predicting he’d continue to be a very good WR, but probably wasn’t going to go on to average 25 TDs per season over the rest of his career (I’m guessing there — you’d project his TDs over those seven games across 16 games and then use that as your average annual TE totall if you didn’t think small sample size was partially at play).
RolandDeschain":c1j5bjjh said:That awesome streak wasn't due to our offensive line becoming good.Mistashoesta":c1j5bjjh said:It certainly is sustainable. Get a cohesive semi functioning offensive line to provide Wilson with reasonable protection and watch Wilson dismantle whatever D is in front of him. Unsustainable would be to lose your job after once reaching the Superbowl and then to unfortunately find yourself unemployed.
austinslater25":2qdgk3yp said:RCATES":2qdgk3yp said:It's Wilson. He has been off every since the start of last year. Either he has taken a step back or the league has figured him and the offense out. Sadly neither he nor Bevell have been able to make a adjustment.
Couldn't disagree more. The line has been garbage throwing the whole thing out of whack. They seem to be playing slightly better so maybe it continues.
RCATES":2zkhsr3q said:austinslater25":2zkhsr3q said:RCATES":2zkhsr3q said:It's Wilson. He has been off every since the start of last year. Either he has taken a step back or the league has figured him and the offense out. Sadly neither he nor Bevell have been able to make a adjustment.
Couldn't disagree more. The line has been garbage throwing the whole thing out of whack. They seem to be playing slightly better so maybe it continues.
Arizona's line is worse then ours. They had no problem putting up big offensive numbers last week. Its easy to blame the O-Line and continue to wear Wilson is elite goggles. His inability to see over the Lineman and having to drop back 10 yards every play to survey the field is a problem. A 3rd and 5 becomes a 15 yard throw to convert. There are only a few teams in this league that have really good offensive line. Its a league wide problem. Wilson inability to stay in the pocket makes it even more difficult for our O-line to protect and know where he's at all times. Teams have figured out how to limit Wilson and the numbers show. Everyone wants to point to Bevell and the lineman but there's a reason that Pete and John haven't made moves to bring in better lineman. They know its Wilson. I hope I'm wrong and he can figure it out. If not its going to be another 2nd round exit.
Seymour":2y0qcnhb said:RCATES":2y0qcnhb said:austinslater25":2y0qcnhb said:RCATES":2y0qcnhb said:It's Wilson. He has been off every since the start of last year. Either he has taken a step back or the league has figured him and the offense out. Sadly neither he nor Bevell have been able to make a adjustment.
Couldn't disagree more. The line has been garbage throwing the whole thing out of whack. They seem to be playing slightly better so maybe it continues.
Arizona's line is worse then ours. They had no problem putting up big offensive numbers last week. Its easy to blame the O-Line and continue to wear Wilson is elite goggles. His inability to see over the Lineman and having to drop back 10 yards every play to survey the field is a problem. A 3rd and 5 becomes a 15 yard throw to convert. There are only a few teams in this league that have really good offensive line. Its a league wide problem. Wilson inability to stay in the pocket makes it even more difficult for our O-line to protect and know where he's at all times. Teams have figured out how to limit Wilson and the numbers show. Everyone wants to point to Bevell and the lineman but there's a reason that Pete and John haven't made moves to bring in better lineman. They know its Wilson. I hope I'm wrong and he can figure it out. If not its going to be another 2nd round exit.
Ya, and it's Wilson's fault the run game has pretty much vanished as well (too short to hand off correctly I guess). Teams don't have to respect the run, can get pressure bringing 3-4, and that leaves little openings down field to make them pay.
And please wake up and investigate what is going on here. They are trying like hell to bring in linemen, they just can't tell a good one from a bad one as we've seen over and over and over again.
RCATES":381vm8ti said:Seymour":381vm8ti said:RCATES":381vm8ti said:austinslater25":381vm8ti said:Couldn't disagree more. The line has been garbage throwing the whole thing out of whack. They seem to be playing slightly better so maybe it continues.
Arizona's line is worse then ours. They had no problem putting up big offensive numbers last week. Its easy to blame the O-Line and continue to wear Wilson is elite goggles. His inability to see over the Lineman and having to drop back 10 yards every play to survey the field is a problem. A 3rd and 5 becomes a 15 yard throw to convert. There are only a few teams in this league that have really good offensive line. Its a league wide problem. Wilson inability to stay in the pocket makes it even more difficult for our O-line to protect and know where he's at all times. Teams have figured out how to limit Wilson and the numbers show. Everyone wants to point to Bevell and the lineman but there's a reason that Pete and John haven't made moves to bring in better lineman. They know its Wilson. I hope I'm wrong and he can figure it out. If not its going to be another 2nd round exit.
Ya, and it's Wilson's fault the run game has pretty much vanished as well (too short to hand off correctly I guess). Teams don't have to respect the run, can get pressure bringing 3-4, and that leaves little openings down field to make them pay.
And please wake up and investigate what is going on here. They are trying like hell to bring in linemen, they just can't tell a good one from a bad one as we've seen over and over and over again.
Only because of the surgery for LJ knowing he was going to be out a extended amount of time. Before that they were content on leaving things as is.
I can show you several articles backing up my assessment of Wilson from writers outside of Seattle.
RCATES":1tjwvqjd said:Arizona's line is worse then ours.
We were at the Colts game 4 rows off the field near the team tunnel. No E still has a noticeable limp. He is not [emoji817]%pittpnthrs":1wrexbdd said:RCATES":1wrexbdd said:Arizona's line is worse then ours.
I dont believe that. They have one of the most immobile QB's in the history of the game and they always seem to find a way to run the ball (hell Peterson just went for 100+ last game) and they seem to always score points. The Seahawks on the other hand,,,,,,,,