What a joke ESPN! Hawks projected rank in Special teams 31

[Hasselbeck]

I see us at #2. Lol

That's overall. ST ranking is 31

 

[253hawk]

Eternally
Sucking
Patriot's
Nuts

 

[G AcheTheSnake]

Those "rankings" seem to be weighted heavily towards offense. #1 on offense, #23 on defense, and #28 on ST, does not translate to a #1 OVERALL team. Hell, I'd argue that even the Broncos "rankings" of #3, #13, and #6 respectively should be above the "#1" Packers. ESPN is nonsense.

 

[SUhawk]

Espn is disgrace to athletes worlwide lol

 

[McG]

ESPN is based out of Bristol, Connecticut (A.K.A. New England, A.K.A. Patriots country). It's almost impossible to watch anything NFL related on any of their channels. They do a pretty damn good job with College Football coverage, but the "homerism" is pretty obvious in some cases in regards to their coverage of the NFL. It's about 80% (or more) east coast teams, they are the definition of "east-coast bias". It makes me thankful for the NFLN or dare I even say it... FoxSports1 (I cannot stand those d-bags they have doing their highlight show). Sometimes, FS1 has some pretty decent stuff on it.

 

[253hawk]

The Patriots (or Red Sox) can win a boring, uneventful, meaningless game against some crap team and ESPN will have highlights, several player interviews and a 5-minute panel discussion about it. Meanwhile, a west coast team will win a nail-biter to clinch a playoff spot and all you'll get is a stats screen for 20 seconds with a quick rundown by a disinterested voice.

 

[stack55]

They probably based it on the Rams game
When our special teams ran to the wrong side
Of the field after the phantom football.
What a joke

 

[theENGLISHseahawk]

The list read like a power ranking. Like people have mentioned GB having the #1 offense puts them at #1 despite poorly ranked defensive and ST units. So what determines they are #1?

 

[Maulbert]

It's ESPN. They had to find some way to put us under the Packers.